東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Ways of knowing: Epistemology, ontol...

Marlor, Chantelle.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Ways of knowing: Epistemology, ontology, and community among ecologists, biologists and First Nations clam diggers.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Ways of knowing: Epistemology, ontology, and community among ecologists, biologists and First Nations clam diggers./
作者:	Marlor, Chantelle.
面頁冊數:	269 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-11, Section: A, page: 4478.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International70-11A.
標題:	Sociology, Social Structure and Development. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3379160
ISBN:	9781109459142

Ways of knowing: Epistemology, ontology, and community among ecologists, biologists and First Nations clam diggers.
Marlor, Chantelle.

Ways of knowing: Epistemology, ontology, and community among ecologists, biologists and First Nations clam diggers. - 269 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-11, Section: A, page: 4478.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick, 2009.

This dissertation is an exploration of the various ways in which knowledge practitioners come to know about a subject. Using four case studies of marine experts—government-based invertebrate biologists, a university-based team of contaminant ecologists, Kwakiutl (or Kwakwaka’wakw) First Nations (Native American) clam diggers, and Nuu Chah Nulth First Nations clam diggers—I explore the processes and practices by which these practitioners produced knowledge about clams. The case studies are based on ethnographic research I conducted between 2003 and 2005. Drawing on tenets espoused by the Strong Programme in the Sociology of Science, I use a balanced (symmetrical) framework to compare the 4 sets of knowledge practitioners‘ social relations with their peers, the signs they use as evidence, the methods by which they order and summarize observations, their relationship to what they come to know, their interests, and the assumptions they make when drawing inferences. My theoretical arguments build on literature drawn from a wide spectrum including works from the sociology of science, sociology of culture and cognition, cognitive anthropology, cognitive psychology, and human ecology. Themes running throughout the dissertation include standardization, precision, the situated body and cognition, community, temporality, and multiplicity.

ISBN: 9781109459142Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017425
Sociology, Social Structure and Development.

Ways of knowing: Epistemology, ontology, and community among ecologists, biologists and First Nations clam diggers.
LDR:02355nam 2200289 4500 001 1957414
005 20140106101125.5
008 150210s2009 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109459142
035 $a (UMI)AAI3379160
035 $a AAI3379160
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Marlor, Chantelle. $3 2092310
245 1 0 $a Ways of knowing: Epistemology, ontology, and community among ecologists, biologists and First Nations clam diggers.
300 $a 269 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-11, Section: A, page: 4478.
500 $a Adviser: John L. Martin.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick, 2009.
520 $a This dissertation is an exploration of the various ways in which knowledge practitioners come to know about a subject. Using four case studies of marine experts—government-based invertebrate biologists, a university-based team of contaminant ecologists, Kwakiutl (or Kwakwaka’wakw) First Nations (Native American) clam diggers, and Nuu Chah Nulth First Nations clam diggers—I explore the processes and practices by which these practitioners produced knowledge about clams. The case studies are based on ethnographic research I conducted between 2003 and 2005. Drawing on tenets espoused by the Strong Programme in the Sociology of Science, I use a balanced (symmetrical) framework to compare the 4 sets of knowledge practitioners‘ social relations with their peers, the signs they use as evidence, the methods by which they order and summarize observations, their relationship to what they come to know, their interests, and the assumptions they make when drawing inferences. My theoretical arguments build on literature drawn from a wide spectrum including works from the sociology of science, sociology of culture and cognition, cognitive anthropology, cognitive psychology, and human ecology. Themes running throughout the dissertation include standardization, precision, the situated body and cognition, community, temporality, and multiplicity.
590 $a School code: 0190.
650 4 $a Sociology, Social Structure and Development. $3 1017425
650 4 $a Native American Studies. $3 626633
650 4 $a Environmental Sciences. $3 676987
690 $a 0700
690 $a 0740
690 $a 0768
710 2 $a Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick. $b Graduate School - New Brunswick. $3 1019196
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 70-11A.
790 1 0 $a Martin, John L., $e advisor
790 $a 0190
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2009
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3379160