東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Teams and working groups - disparate...

Reitmeier, Stephanie Brown.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Teams and working groups - disparate organization concepts: A psychometrically sound instrument for the classification of engineering groups.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Teams and working groups - disparate organization concepts: A psychometrically sound instrument for the classification of engineering groups./
作者:	Reitmeier, Stephanie Brown.
面頁冊數:	120 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-07(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-07B(E).
標題:	Business Administration, Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3556346
ISBN:	9781267982483

Teams and working groups - disparate organization concepts: A psychometrically sound instrument for the classification of engineering groups.
Reitmeier, Stephanie Brown.

Teams and working groups - disparate organization concepts: A psychometrically sound instrument for the classification of engineering groups. - 120 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-07(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Alabama in Huntsville, 2013.

Groups are a ubiquitous element in organizational design. The performance gains achieved through the use of groups for creative ideation, complex problem solving, and even organizational control have been widely accepted as certainty when, of course, those groups are teams. As a result, untold resources are applied to groups in the workplace. In an attempt to make groups more team-like, emergent properties are fostered, and mutual accountability is stressed. These activities are assumed to create a team from a group of individuals, and subsequently, this team is expected to enhance performance. But is high performance ultimately limited to teams? Is it possible that high performance can be obtained by a simple work group? In order to accurately appraise the root of performance gains achieved by teams and to justify the resources expended in the pursuit of team building, researchers must understand if the group under examination is, in fact, a team. The Team versus Working Group (TvWG) self-assessment questionnaire is a valid, psychometrically sound instrument that can be used to identify those groups of engineers and scientists who are acting as teams and those who are acting as working groups. The instrument is based on twelve specific constructs of group characteristics. The TvWG can be used by researchers and managers alike to understand the underlying foundation of a group before determining how best to apply resources for intervention and performance assessment.

ISBN: 9781267982483Subjects--Topical Terms:

626628
Business Administration, Management.

Teams and working groups - disparate organization concepts: A psychometrically sound instrument for the classification of engineering groups.
LDR:02684nam 2200337 4500 001 1957345
005 20131202131341.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781267982483
035 $a (UMI)AAI3556346
035 $a AAI3556346
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Reitmeier, Stephanie Brown. $3 2092226
245 1 0 $a Teams and working groups - disparate organization concepts: A psychometrically sound instrument for the classification of engineering groups.
300 $a 120 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-07(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Dawn R. Utley.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Alabama in Huntsville, 2013.
520 $a Groups are a ubiquitous element in organizational design. The performance gains achieved through the use of groups for creative ideation, complex problem solving, and even organizational control have been widely accepted as certainty when, of course, those groups are teams. As a result, untold resources are applied to groups in the workplace. In an attempt to make groups more team-like, emergent properties are fostered, and mutual accountability is stressed. These activities are assumed to create a team from a group of individuals, and subsequently, this team is expected to enhance performance. But is high performance ultimately limited to teams? Is it possible that high performance can be obtained by a simple work group? In order to accurately appraise the root of performance gains achieved by teams and to justify the resources expended in the pursuit of team building, researchers must understand if the group under examination is, in fact, a team. The Team versus Working Group (TvWG) self-assessment questionnaire is a valid, psychometrically sound instrument that can be used to identify those groups of engineers and scientists who are acting as teams and those who are acting as working groups. The instrument is based on twelve specific constructs of group characteristics. The TvWG can be used by researchers and managers alike to understand the underlying foundation of a group before determining how best to apply resources for intervention and performance assessment.
590 $a School code: 0278.
650 4 $a Business Administration, Management. $3 626628
650 4 $a Engineering, General. $3 1020744
650 4 $a Engineering, Industrial. $3 626639
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0537
690 $a 0546
710 2 $a The University of Alabama in Huntsville. $b Industrial and Systems Engineering and Engineering Management. $3 2092227
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-07B(E).
790 1 0 $a Utley, Dawn R., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Fortune, Julie $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Carpenter, Sandra $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Swain, James J. $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Messimer, Sherri $e committee member
790 $a 0278
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3556346