東華大學圖書館 |

Governing the use-of-force in international relations = the post 9/11 US challenge on international law /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Governing the use-of-force in international relations/ Aiden Warren, Ingvild Bode.
其他題名:	the post 9/11 US challenge on international law /
作者:	Warren, Aiden.
其他作者:	Bode, Ingvild.
出版者:	Basingstoke :Palgrave Macmillan : : 2014.,
面頁冊數:	248 p. :5 ill.
附註:	Electronic book text.
內容註:	Introduction 1. The International Legal Paradigm: The UN Charter jus ad bellum Regime 2. Self-Defence in International Law: Pre-emptive/Preventive Requisites 3. Preventive and Pre-emptive Self-Defence in US National Security Policy: A Brief History 4. Bush and the Use-of-Force 5. Obama and the Use-of-Force 6. The Rise of Drones Conclusion - The Use-of-Force and the Making of Hegemonic International Law: from Bush to Obama.
標題:	Internal security - United States. -
標題:	United States - Race relations. -
電子資源:	http://link.springer.com/10.1057/9781137411440Online journal 'available contents' page
ISBN:	1137411449 (electronic bk.) :

Governing the use-of-force in international relations = the post 9/11 US challenge on international law /
Warren, Aiden.

Governing the use-of-force in international relationsthe post 9/11 US challenge on international law /[electronic resource] :Aiden Warren, Ingvild Bode. - 1st ed. - Basingstoke :Palgrave Macmillan :2014. - 248 p. :5 ill. - New security challenges.

Electronic book text.

Introduction 1. The International Legal Paradigm: The UN Charter jus ad bellum Regime 2. Self-Defence in International Law: Pre-emptive/Preventive Requisites 3. Preventive and Pre-emptive Self-Defence in US National Security Policy: A Brief History 4. Bush and the Use-of-Force 5. Obama and the Use-of-Force 6. The Rise of Drones Conclusion - The Use-of-Force and the Making of Hegemonic International Law: from Bush to Obama.

Document

This book examines US recourse to military force in the post-9/11 era. In particular, it evaluates the extent to which the Bush and Obama administrations viewed legitimizing the greater use-of-force as a necessary solution to thwart the security threat presented by global terrorist networks and WMD proliferation.This book examines US recourse to military force in the post-9/11 era. In particular, it evaluates the extent to which the Bush and Obama administrations viewed legitimizing the greater use-of-force as a necessary solution to thwart the security threat presented by global terrorist networks and WMD proliferation. The Bush administration's use-of-force policy centered on advocating preemptive self-defence options, which were really preventive in nature. For example, it is argued that they responded to potential long-term threats based on ambiguous evidence. Central to this cloaking of preventive options in the more legitimate language of preemptive self-defence was an expanded notion of what counts as an imminent threat. Despite the Obama administration's avowal to multilateralism and professed US adherence to global norms, it did not expressly reject his predecessor's reasoning on the preemptive/preventive use-of-force. Indeed, the Administration's counter-terrorist campaign against Al Qaeda and in particular its drone program made the use-of-force in self-defence a widespread, regular, even commonplace occurrence during Obama's tenure. Despite being positioned at different points on the political spectrum, the book therefore concludes that Bush and Obama have chosen a remarkably similar approach towards expanding the use-of-force in self-defence.

PDF.

Aiden Warren is Senior Lecturer in the School of Global, Urban and Social Studies at RMIT University in Melbourne, Australia. His research interests are in the areas of International Security, US national security and foreign policy, US Politics, International Relations, and issues associated with Weapons of Mass Destruction, proliferation, non-proliferation and arms control. He is the author of The Obama Administration's Nuclear Weapon Strategy: the Promises of Prague and Prevention, Pre-emption and the Nuclear Option: From Bush to Obama. Ingvild Bode is JSPS Postdoctoral Fellow in the Institute for Sustainability and Peace at the United Nations University in Tokyo, Japan. Her research interests are in the areas of understanding individual agency, norm and policy change at the UN, international humanitarian law and the United Nations system. She is the co-author of Key Concepts in International Relations (with Thomas Diez and Aleksandra Fernandes da Costa).

ISBN: 1137411449 (electronic bk.) :£65.00Subjects--Topical Terms:

815500
Internal security
--United States.Subjects--Geographical Terms:

3649311
United States
--Race relations.

LC Class. No.: KZ6368 / .W37 2014

Dewey Class. No.: 327.73

Governing the use-of-force in international relations = the post 9/11 US challenge on international law /
LDR:05710nmm a22004092a 4500 001 1951135
003 UK-WkNB
005 20141103000000.0
007 cu||||||||||||
008 231227e201410uuxxk |s|||||||0|0 eng|d
020 $a 1137411449 (electronic bk.) : $c £65.00
020 $a 9781137411433
020 $a 9781137411440 (electronic bk.) : $c £65.00
035 $a 9781137411440
035 $a 1951135
040 $a UK-WkNB $b eng $c UK-WkNB
050 4 $a KZ6368 $b .W37 2014
072 $a JPS $x 1KBB $x 3JM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a JWJ $x 1KBB $x 3JM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a JWK $x 1KBB $x 3JM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a POL $2 ukslc
082 0 4 $a 327.73 $2 23
100 1 $a Warren, Aiden. $3 2080054
245 1 0 $a Governing the use-of-force in international relations $h [electronic resource] : $b the post 9/11 US challenge on international law / $c Aiden Warren, Ingvild Bode.
250 $a 1st ed.
260 $a Basingstoke : $b Palgrave Macmillan : $b [distributor] Not Avail, $c 2014.
300 $a 248 p. : $b 5 ill.
365 $a 02 $b 65.00 $c GBP $d 00 $h S 54.17 20.0 65.00 10.83 $j GB $k xxk $m Palgrave Macmillan $2 onix-pt
366 $b 20141002 $c IP 20140919 $j GB $k xxk $m Palgrave Macmillan $2 UK-WkNB
490 0 $a New security challenges
500 $a Electronic book text.
500 $a Epublication based on: 9781137411433.
505 0 $a Introduction 1. The International Legal Paradigm: The UN Charter jus ad bellum Regime 2. Self-Defence in International Law: Pre-emptive/Preventive Requisites 3. Preventive and Pre-emptive Self-Defence in US National Security Policy: A Brief History 4. Bush and the Use-of-Force 5. Obama and the Use-of-Force 6. The Rise of Drones Conclusion - The Use-of-Force and the Making of Hegemonic International Law: from Bush to Obama.
516 $a Document
520 $a This book examines US recourse to military force in the post-9/11 era. In particular, it evaluates the extent to which the Bush and Obama administrations viewed legitimizing the greater use-of-force as a necessary solution to thwart the security threat presented by global terrorist networks and WMD proliferation. $b This book examines US recourse to military force in the post-9/11 era. In particular, it evaluates the extent to which the Bush and Obama administrations viewed legitimizing the greater use-of-force as a necessary solution to thwart the security threat presented by global terrorist networks and WMD proliferation. The Bush administration's use-of-force policy centered on advocating preemptive self-defence options, which were really preventive in nature. For example, it is argued that they responded to potential long-term threats based on ambiguous evidence. Central to this cloaking of preventive options in the more legitimate language of preemptive self-defence was an expanded notion of what counts as an imminent threat. Despite the Obama administration's avowal to multilateralism and professed US adherence to global norms, it did not expressly reject his predecessor's reasoning on the preemptive/preventive use-of-force. Indeed, the Administration's counter-terrorist campaign against Al Qaeda and in particular its drone program made the use-of-force in self-defence a widespread, regular, even commonplace occurrence during Obama's tenure. Despite being positioned at different points on the political spectrum, the book therefore concludes that Bush and Obama have chosen a remarkably similar approach towards expanding the use-of-force in self-defence.
520 1 $a This well-written volume is a timely reminder that the attitude of the greatest military power on earth towards the legal regime on the use of force remains as relevant today as it has ever been. Highly recommended for all those seeking to understand how hegemonic powers conduct their foreign relations as well as for those wanting to keeping abreast of ongoing contestation surrounding the interpretation of the Charter provisions on use-of-force.' - Shirley Scott, University of New South Wales, Australia 'Continuity or change? This accessible, salutary, timely and engaging account of American engagement with the rules on the use of force, under Bush and Obama, offers vital insights at a time of obvious and increasing challenge.' - Philippe Sands, University College London, UK 'Warren and Bode have produced a timely, well-written book that documents the continuity that defined the United States' approach to international law and the use-of-force over the last decade. It should be required reading for anyone interested in foreign policy and international relations but more generally for anyone with an interest in how the world has operated since the 9/11 terrorist attacks.' - Sarah Kreps, Cornell University, US.
538 $a PDF.
545 0 $a Aiden Warren is Senior Lecturer in the School of Global, Urban and Social Studies at RMIT University in Melbourne, Australia. His research interests are in the areas of International Security, US national security and foreign policy, US Politics, International Relations, and issues associated with Weapons of Mass Destruction, proliferation, non-proliferation and arms control. He is the author of The Obama Administration's Nuclear Weapon Strategy: the Promises of Prague and Prevention, Pre-emption and the Nuclear Option: From Bush to Obama. Ingvild Bode is JSPS Postdoctoral Fellow in the Institute for Sustainability and Peace at the United Nations University in Tokyo, Japan. Her research interests are in the areas of understanding individual agency, norm and policy change at the UN, international humanitarian law and the United Nations system. She is the co-author of Key Concepts in International Relations (with Thomas Diez and Aleksandra Fernandes da Costa).
650 0 $a Internal security $z United States. $3 815500
650 0 $a International law $z United States. $3 785395
650 0 $a Intervention (International law). $3 603055
650 0 $a Preemptive attack (Military science). $3 773878
650 0 $a Self-defense (International law). $3 2080056
650 0 $a Unilateral acts (International law). $3 603054
650 7 $a Defence strategy, planning & research $y 21st century $z USA. $2 bicssc $3 2080057
650 7 $a International relations $y 21st century $z USA. $2 bicssc $3 2080058
650 7 $a Military administration $y 21st century $z USA. $2 bicssc $3 2080059
650 7 $a Politics and Government. $2 eflch $3 1082827
651 0 $a United States $x Race relations. $3 3649311
700 1 $a Bode, Ingvild. $3 2080055
856 4 $u http://link.springer.com/10.1057/9781137411440 $x 05 $z Online journal 'available contents' page