東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The effect of home care use on insti...

Guo, Jing.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The effect of home care use on institutional care utilization and expenditures.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The effect of home care use on institutional care utilization and expenditures./
作者:	Guo, Jing.
面頁冊數:	95 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-01A(E).
標題:	Economics, General. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3595911
ISBN:	9781303422812

The effect of home care use on institutional care utilization and expenditures.
Guo, Jing.

The effect of home care use on institutional care utilization and expenditures. - 95 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-01(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2013.

Over the past several decades, developing home- and community-based services (HCBS) alternatives to institutional care has been a priority for many state Medicaid programs, ostensibly in order to meet strong preferences for home care and to reduce costs. However, limited evidence exists on whether expanding home care reduces institutional care use or saves money overall. This study aims to estimate the causal effect of using home care services on the utilization and costs of institutional medical care, including nursing facilities and inpatient care, and to provide necessary evidence for public policy on long-term care resource allocation.

ISBN: 9781303422812Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017424
Economics, General.

The effect of home care use on institutional care utilization and expenditures.
LDR:03718nmm a2200313 4500 001 1932252
005 20140805082245.5
008 140827s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303422812
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3595911
035 $a AAI3595911
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Guo, Jing. $3 2049882
245 1 4 $a The effect of home care use on institutional care utilization and expenditures.
300 $a 95 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-01(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: R. Tamara Konetzka.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2013.
520 $a Over the past several decades, developing home- and community-based services (HCBS) alternatives to institutional care has been a priority for many state Medicaid programs, ostensibly in order to meet strong preferences for home care and to reduce costs. However, limited evidence exists on whether expanding home care reduces institutional care use or saves money overall. This study aims to estimate the causal effect of using home care services on the utilization and costs of institutional medical care, including nursing facilities and inpatient care, and to provide necessary evidence for public policy on long-term care resource allocation.
520 $a This study uses Medicaid claims data of adults from the Cash and Counseling Demonstration and Evaluation program in three states to estimate the causal effect of paid home care services on the costs and utilization of nursing facilities and inpatient medical care, free from selection bias in the choice to receive home care. An instrumental variable approach was applied to address the potential bias caused by measurement error of home care, essential heterogeneity / endogenous health care use, or the reverse effect of institutional care use. The instrumental variable exploits the randomized assignment to traditional Medicaid versus Cash and Counseling, which indirectly increased consumers' ability to receive home care. Two-part models and appropriate transformations were employed in order to address skewness and zero-mass distribution of the data.
520 $a The results suggest that the use of Medicaid-financed home care services significantly reduced utilization and Medicaid expenditures on institutional care. Home care use has strong negative effects on the likelihoods of both incurring any inpatient care and any Medicaid-financed nursing facility services. Within the preferred specification, a $1000 increase in Medicaid home care expenditures avoided 1.61 days in nursing facilities and reduced annual Medicaid nursing facility costs by $173 across the full sample when endogeneity is addressed. The Medicaid offset is an underestimate of the total offset, as Medicare also pays for inpatient care and some nursing home stays, costs which would also be reduced by fewer nursing home and hospital stays.
520 $a Therefore, Medicaid-financed home care appears to partially offset institutional care use, which usually generates much higher costs. Failure to address selection biases would underestimate this effect or even lead to the opposite conclusion that the two are net complements. More generous funding of home care might be a potential way to provide cost-effective care, but a rigorous overall evaluation must include the tradeoff in benefits, i.e. a rigorous assessment of preferences and health outcomes in the two care settings.
590 $a School code: 0330.
650 4 $a Economics, General. $3 1017424
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Health Care Management. $3 1017922
690 $a 0501
690 $a 0769
710 2 $a The University of Chicago. $b Health Studies. $3 2049883
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-01A(E).
790 $a 0330
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3595911