東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Contrasting the preservation value o...

Hsu, Yi-Chung.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Contrasting the preservation value of a domestic and a foreign wildlife reserve.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Contrasting the preservation value of a domestic and a foreign wildlife reserve./
作者:	Hsu, Yi-Chung.
面頁冊數:	163 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-04, Section: A, page: 1326.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International60-04A.
標題:	Recreation. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9926603
ISBN:	0599263822

Contrasting the preservation value of a domestic and a foreign wildlife reserve.
Hsu, Yi-Chung.

Contrasting the preservation value of a domestic and a foreign wildlife reserve. - 163 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-04, Section: A, page: 1326.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Clemson University, 1998.

Environmental and resource economists often perform cost benefit analysis prior to the development of projects involving natural resource allocation decisions. Apart from acting as an indicator of the strength of environmental preference, this measurement plays an essential role in developing regulatory policy by studying the monetary value of benefits in comparison to the dollar costs of enforcing a policy. Benefit measurement techniques for nonuse value have relied heavily on the contingent valuation method which frequently uses surveys to obtain information on the demand for nonmarket goods, such as clean air, a pleasant view, or the aesthetic value of the forest. People are generally asked what they are willing to pay for a benefit such as environmental improvement or preservation. To date, there exists a lack of nonuse value estimates related to environmental goods of developing countries, or a comparison of domestic and foreign sites in terms of the nonuse value and underlying motives for this value. As such, this study sought to construct a framework to further explain why people, if they do value these areas, place a value on these environmental goods for which they have no easy access. The specific purpose was to investigate the preservation value and the motives for willingness to pay to preserve two wildlife reserves, one in Rhode Island and one in Taiwan. The contingent valuation method was utilized to measure WTP values. Two versions of a self-administered questionnaire were distributed to 2,000 individuals in four southeastern states of North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida. The response rates were 23.8 percent and 20.6 percent for Rhode Island and Taiwan versions, respectively. The findings revealed that about one third of the respondents were willing to pay to preserve either of the wildlife reserves. The WTP values for the Rhode Island site was significantly greater than that for the Taiwan site (mean values

ISBN: 0599263822Subjects--Topical Terms:

535376
Recreation.

Contrasting the preservation value of a domestic and a foreign wildlife reserve.
LDR:04102nmm 2200313 4500 001 1864808
005 20041216133437.5
008 130614s1998 eng d
020 $a 0599263822
035 $a (UnM)AAI9926603
035 $a AAI9926603
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Hsu, Yi-Chung. $3 1952278
245 1 0 $a Contrasting the preservation value of a domestic and a foreign wildlife reserve.
300 $a 163 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-04, Section: A, page: 1326.
500 $a Adviser: R. W. McLellan.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Clemson University, 1998.
520 $a Environmental and resource economists often perform cost benefit analysis prior to the development of projects involving natural resource allocation decisions. Apart from acting as an indicator of the strength of environmental preference, this measurement plays an essential role in developing regulatory policy by studying the monetary value of benefits in comparison to the dollar costs of enforcing a policy. Benefit measurement techniques for nonuse value have relied heavily on the contingent valuation method which frequently uses surveys to obtain information on the demand for nonmarket goods, such as clean air, a pleasant view, or the aesthetic value of the forest. People are generally asked what they are willing to pay for a benefit such as environmental improvement or preservation. To date, there exists a lack of nonuse value estimates related to environmental goods of developing countries, or a comparison of domestic and foreign sites in terms of the nonuse value and underlying motives for this value. As such, this study sought to construct a framework to further explain why people, if they do value these areas, place a value on these environmental goods for which they have no easy access. The specific purpose was to investigate the preservation value and the motives for willingness to pay to preserve two wildlife reserves, one in Rhode Island and one in Taiwan. The contingent valuation method was utilized to measure WTP values. Two versions of a self-administered questionnaire were distributed to 2,000 individuals in four southeastern states of North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida. The response rates were 23.8 percent and 20.6 percent for Rhode Island and Taiwan versions, respectively. The findings revealed that about one third of the respondents were willing to pay to preserve either of the wildlife reserves. The WTP values for the Rhode Island site was significantly greater than that for the Taiwan site (mean values $2 1.73 and $1 0.13, respectively). The economic motives underlying the WTP values were not different between the respondents for the two sites. The results also indicated that the Taiwan subgroup scored higher on ethical motives for allocating monies for preservation than did their Rhode Island counterparts. A five-variable regression model that explained 25% of the variance of the WTP values was identified. These variables included "stewardship motive," "affordability motive," "Potential future use," "age," and "Membership in environmental groups." Based on these data, conclusions were drawn. First, about 32% of the sample was willing to pay to preserve a nonaccessible, far away, and unfamiliar environmental amenity. The WTP values of the respondents were not solely motivated by ethical motives, but also by self-driven interests such as potential future use. The contingent values derived appeared to reflect attributes associated with making a contribution, not only a purchase behavior. Further study is needed to determine if environmental preferences expressed by a willingness to pay measure can fully express the importance of ecosystem integrity to human society.
590 $a School code: 0050.
650 4 $a Recreation. $3 535376
650 4 $a Economics, General. $3 1017424
650 4 $a Environmental Sciences. $3 676987
650 4 $a Agriculture, Forestry and Wildlife. $3 783690
650 4 $a Economics, Agricultural. $3 626648
690 $a 0814
690 $a 0501
690 $a 0768
690 $a 0478
690 $a 0503
710 2 0 $a Clemson University. $3 997173
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 60-04A.
790 1 0 $a McLellan, R. W., $e advisor
790 $a 0050
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1998
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9926603