東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Embryos, cloning, and controversy: ...

Weed, Matthew Aaron.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Embryos, cloning, and controversy: A comparative analysis of research policy in the United States and Great Britain.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Embryos, cloning, and controversy: A comparative analysis of research policy in the United States and Great Britain./
作者:	Weed, Matthew Aaron.
面頁冊數:	380 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-03, Section: B, page: 1138.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International65-03B.
標題:	Biology, Genetics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3125324

Embryos, cloning, and controversy: A comparative analysis of research policy in the United States and Great Britain.
Weed, Matthew Aaron.

Embryos, cloning, and controversy: A comparative analysis of research policy in the United States and Great Britain. - 380 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-03, Section: B, page: 1138.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Yale University, 2004.

Legislative and regulatory environments fundamentally affect society's ability to assimilate and regulate controversial scientific research effectively.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017730
Biology, Genetics.

Embryos, cloning, and controversy: A comparative analysis of research policy in the United States and Great Britain.
LDR:02137nmm 2200337 4500 001 1862739
005 20041119083416.5
008 130614s2004 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI3125324
035 $a AAI3125324
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Weed, Matthew Aaron. $3 1950279
245 1 0 $a Embryos, cloning, and controversy: A comparative analysis of research policy in the United States and Great Britain.
300 $a 380 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-03, Section: B, page: 1138.
500 $a Director: Kenneth K. Kidd.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Yale University, 2004.
520 $a Legislative and regulatory environments fundamentally affect society's ability to assimilate and regulate controversial scientific research effectively.
520 $a External regulation of research and near-term clinical benefits were factors that proved essential to legitimizing recombinant DNA experiments in both the United States and United Kingdom in the late 1970s. In the United Kingdom, legitimizing re
520 $a The United Kingdom's Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) has developed regulatory legitimacy, as indicated by information from interviews with British scientists and transcripts of parliamentary debates on embryo research. The HF
520 $a Interviews indicate that British pro-life lobbies feel that disorganization and limited resources have reduced their effectiveness. The importance of organized lobbying is highlighted by the successes of the United States' Coalition for the Adva
520 $a The centralized nature of the British Government enabled regulatory changes to be enacted quickly once it was decided that embryo research should be allowed for the purpose of developing treatments for serious disease. Multiple levels of governa
590 $a School code: 0265.
650 4 $a Biology, Genetics. $3 1017730
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Health Care Management. $3 1017922
650 4 $a Political Science, Public Administration. $3 1017438
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
690 $a 0369
690 $a 0769
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0422
710 2 0 $a Yale University. $3 515640
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 65-03B.
790 1 0 $a Kidd, Kenneth K., $e advisor
790 $a 0265
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2004
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3125324