東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A comparison of knowledge retention ...

Poore, Everett E.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A comparison of knowledge retention of computer-based training under varied environments.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A comparison of knowledge retention of computer-based training under varied environments./
作者:	Poore, Everett E.
面頁冊數:	99 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-12, Section: A, page: 4432.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-12A.
標題:	Education, Technology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3117403

A comparison of knowledge retention of computer-based training under varied environments.
Poore, Everett E.

A comparison of knowledge retention of computer-based training under varied environments. - 99 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-12, Section: A, page: 4432.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2004.

In order to stem the rising cost of training, businesses are looking for more efficient, effective methods for training. One such strategy involves distance learning, including computer-based training (CBT). The problem is ensuring that different delivery methods of CBT yield similar results in terms of employee knowledge retention. The study compared knowledge retention rates of an experimental group who took CBT at their desktops against the retention rates of a control group who completed their training in a learning center environment where the conditions were controlled and predictable. The hypothesis was that the unpredictability of the desktop environment would result in lower rates of knowledge retention than those of the participants in the learning center group. To determine that participants perceived a difference between the two different learning environments, an 8-question learning environment survey was administered to both groups. A 50-person sample population from each group was tested 30 days after the original training took place and a t-test analysis was conducted. The results of the survey indicated participants did perceive the environments were different. Post training testing, however, revealed no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of knowledge retention.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017498
Education, Technology.

A comparison of knowledge retention of computer-based training under varied environments.
LDR:02187nmm 2200265 4500 001 1860605
005 20041108065932.5
008 130614s2004 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI3117403
035 $a AAI3117403
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Poore, Everett E. $3 1948235
245 1 2 $a A comparison of knowledge retention of computer-based training under varied environments.
300 $a 99 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-12, Section: A, page: 4432.
500 $a Adviser: Stanley Trollip.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2004.
520 $a In order to stem the rising cost of training, businesses are looking for more efficient, effective methods for training. One such strategy involves distance learning, including computer-based training (CBT). The problem is ensuring that different delivery methods of CBT yield similar results in terms of employee knowledge retention. The study compared knowledge retention rates of an experimental group who took CBT at their desktops against the retention rates of a control group who completed their training in a learning center environment where the conditions were controlled and predictable. The hypothesis was that the unpredictability of the desktop environment would result in lower rates of knowledge retention than those of the participants in the learning center group. To determine that participants perceived a difference between the two different learning environments, an 8-question learning environment survey was administered to both groups. A 50-person sample population from each group was tested 30 days after the original training took place and a t-test analysis was conducted. The results of the survey indicated participants did perceive the environments were different. Post training testing, however, revealed no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of knowledge retention.
590 $a School code: 1351.
650 4 $a Education, Technology. $3 1017498
650 4 $a Education, Industrial. $3 1017516
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0521
710 2 0 $a Capella University. $3 1017687
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-12A.
790 1 0 $a Trollip, Stanley, $e advisor
790 $a 1351
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2004
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3117403