東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Construct validity of College Basic ...

Gao, Rui.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Construct validity of College Basic Academic Subject Examination.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Construct validity of College Basic Academic Subject Examination./
作者:	Gao, Rui.
面頁冊數:	160 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-05, Section: A, page: 1525.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-05A.
標題:	Education, Educational Psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3091926

Construct validity of College Basic Academic Subject Examination.
Gao, Rui.

Construct validity of College Basic Academic Subject Examination. - 160 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-05, Section: A, page: 1525.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Missouri - Columbia, 2003.

The study utilized a unitary approach to evaluate the construct validity of College Basic Subject Examination. The sample consisted of 8009 examinees taking test form LM in year 2000. Psychometric properties of test items and internal consistency of the test were first examined. Second, multiple correlational studies were carried out among subject scores of the test and external criterion. Third, the factorial component of the test was explored based on measured skills. Fourth, the construct structure of the test was tested for each academic subject domain of the test. Fifth, the structural invariance was investigated across different ethnic and gender groups. Finally, differential item functioning analyses were performed on pairs of ethnic and gender groups. The study provided evidence of construct validity for College BASE as an academic achievement test with regard to its item characteristics, reliability, and fidelity to theoretical construct structure. However, the structural noninvariance across ethnic and gender groups indicated some skill scores bear different meanings for different subgroups. In addition, a significant portion of the test items displayed bias against different ethnic and gender groups and contribute to structural noninvariance. The fairness of the test can be improved with revision or deletion of the biased items. Future research may gather predictive-related validity evidence and examine multidimensionality of the test.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017560
Education, Educational Psychology.

Construct validity of College Basic Academic Subject Examination.
LDR:02360nmm 2200277 4500 001 1859106
005 20041105113258.5
008 130614s2003 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI3091926
035 $a AAI3091926
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Gao, Rui. $3 1946771
245 1 0 $a Construct validity of College Basic Academic Subject Examination.
300 $a 160 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-05, Section: A, page: 1525.
500 $a Supervisor: Steven J. Osterlind.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Missouri - Columbia, 2003.
520 $a The study utilized a unitary approach to evaluate the construct validity of College Basic Subject Examination. The sample consisted of 8009 examinees taking test form LM in year 2000. Psychometric properties of test items and internal consistency of the test were first examined. Second, multiple correlational studies were carried out among subject scores of the test and external criterion. Third, the factorial component of the test was explored based on measured skills. Fourth, the construct structure of the test was tested for each academic subject domain of the test. Fifth, the structural invariance was investigated across different ethnic and gender groups. Finally, differential item functioning analyses were performed on pairs of ethnic and gender groups. The study provided evidence of construct validity for College BASE as an academic achievement test with regard to its item characteristics, reliability, and fidelity to theoretical construct structure. However, the structural noninvariance across ethnic and gender groups indicated some skill scores bear different meanings for different subgroups. In addition, a significant portion of the test items displayed bias against different ethnic and gender groups and contribute to structural noninvariance. The fairness of the test can be improved with revision or deletion of the biased items. Future research may gather predictive-related validity evidence and examine multidimensionality of the test.
590 $a School code: 0133.
650 4 $a Education, Educational Psychology. $3 1017560
650 4 $a Education, Tests and Measurements. $3 1017589
650 4 $a Psychology, Psychometrics. $3 1017742
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0288
690 $a 0632
710 2 0 $a University of Missouri - Columbia. $3 1017522
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-05A.
790 1 0 $a Osterlind, Steven J., $e advisor
790 $a 0133
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3091926