東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Hedging or speculating: Differences...

Bowlin, Lyle Lewis.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Hedging or speculating: Differences in systematic and unsystematic risk at bank holding companies that use derivatives.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Hedging or speculating: Differences in systematic and unsystematic risk at bank holding companies that use derivatives./
作者:	Bowlin, Lyle Lewis.
面頁冊數:	151 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-03, Section: A, page: 1011.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-03A.
標題:	Business Administration, Banking. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3083917

Hedging or speculating: Differences in systematic and unsystematic risk at bank holding companies that use derivatives.
Bowlin, Lyle Lewis.

Hedging or speculating: Differences in systematic and unsystematic risk at bank holding companies that use derivatives. - 151 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-03, Section: A, page: 1011.

Thesis (D.B.A.)--Nova Southeastern University, 2003.

The increasing use of derivatives by commercial banks has been the subject of regulatory interest. Hedging through the use of derivatives can be an effective mechanism for controlling risks. However, large commercial banks are using derivatives for trading and, potentially, not for purely hedging purposes. Research examining the consequence of derivatives use on banks' stock return or volatility is limited. The focus of this dissertation is to determine if there are statistically significant risk differences for bank holding companies using derivatives. Systematic and unsystematic risk measurements are used to test for differences in the levels of risk based on two tests. The first test compares the level of risk across portfolios formed on the basis of the percentage of derivatives that are reported as ‘held-for-trading’. The second test compares the level of risk across portfolios formed on the basis of the level of the notional value of derivatives held by the firms. The hypothesis that bank holding companies using derivatives to hedge should have very low or no exposure to price changes underlying the derivative contracts is also tested. Lastly, a pair of hypotheses test whether derivative holdings and bank holding companies' exposure to interest rate and exchange rate risks are related. The results support the hypothesis that the percentage of derivatives held-for-trading and the hypothesis that the size of the derivatives portfolio does have an statistically significant effect on total return volatility but not for systematic risk levels. There is also evidence that large firms using exchange rate derivatives have increased risk which is not consistent with the notion that exchange rate derivatives should hedge their positions.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018458
Business Administration, Banking.

Hedging or speculating: Differences in systematic and unsystematic risk at bank holding companies that use derivatives.
LDR:02674nmm 2200265 4500 001 1857231
005 20040809115644.5
008 130614s2003 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI3083917
035 $a AAI3083917
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Bowlin, Lyle Lewis. $3 1944958
245 1 0 $a Hedging or speculating: Differences in systematic and unsystematic risk at bank holding companies that use derivatives.
300 $a 151 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-03, Section: A, page: 1011.
500 $a Adviser: Alan Gart.
502 $a Thesis (D.B.A.)--Nova Southeastern University, 2003.
520 $a The increasing use of derivatives by commercial banks has been the subject of regulatory interest. Hedging through the use of derivatives can be an effective mechanism for controlling risks. However, large commercial banks are using derivatives for trading and, potentially, not for purely hedging purposes. Research examining the consequence of derivatives use on banks' stock return or volatility is limited. The focus of this dissertation is to determine if there are statistically significant risk differences for bank holding companies using derivatives. Systematic and unsystematic risk measurements are used to test for differences in the levels of risk based on two tests. The first test compares the level of risk across portfolios formed on the basis of the percentage of derivatives that are reported as ‘held-for-trading’. The second test compares the level of risk across portfolios formed on the basis of the level of the notional value of derivatives held by the firms. The hypothesis that bank holding companies using derivatives to hedge should have very low or no exposure to price changes underlying the derivative contracts is also tested. Lastly, a pair of hypotheses test whether derivative holdings and bank holding companies' exposure to interest rate and exchange rate risks are related. The results support the hypothesis that the percentage of derivatives held-for-trading and the hypothesis that the size of the derivatives portfolio does have an statistically significant effect on total return volatility but not for systematic risk levels. There is also evidence that large firms using exchange rate derivatives have increased risk which is not consistent with the notion that exchange rate derivatives should hedge their positions.
590 $a School code: 1191.
650 4 $a Business Administration, Banking. $3 1018458
650 4 $a Economics, Finance. $3 626650
690 $a 0770
690 $a 0508
710 2 0 $a Nova Southeastern University. $3 1017571
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-03A.
790 1 0 $a Gart, Alan, $e advisor
790 $a 1191
791 $a D.B.A.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3083917