東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Health care professionals' ethical d...

Pierce, Susan Foley.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Health care professionals' ethical decision-making: The nature of their moral reasoning.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Health care professionals' ethical decision-making: The nature of their moral reasoning./
作者:	Pierce, Susan Foley.
面頁冊數:	331 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 52-01, Section: A, page: 0108.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International52-01A.
標題:	Education, Philosophy of. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=9106132

Health care professionals' ethical decision-making: The nature of their moral reasoning.
Pierce, Susan Foley.

Health care professionals' ethical decision-making: The nature of their moral reasoning. - 331 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 52-01, Section: A, page: 0108.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1990.

The process of ethical decision making is holistic and complex with many intricately interrelated components. The use of reason, of the intellect, in arriving at ethical decisions and moral choices is necessarily influenced by an individual's self view, values and world view. Such a phenomenon is best understood through interpreting naturally occurring events. Therefore, this qualitative study utilized intensive open-ended interviewing to investigate nurses' and doctors' self views, world views and cherished values, and how these non-cognitive factors interrelated with their reasoned approaches to, and outcomes of, their ethical decision making.Subjects--Topical Terms:

783746
Education, Philosophy of.

Health care professionals' ethical decision-making: The nature of their moral reasoning.
LDR:03428nmm 2200313 4500 001 1856367
005 20040701122240.5
008 130614s1990 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI9106132
035 $a AAI9106132
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Pierce, Susan Foley. $3 1944148
245 1 0 $a Health care professionals' ethical decision-making: The nature of their moral reasoning.
300 $a 331 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 52-01, Section: A, page: 0108.
500 $a Director: George W. Noblit.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1990.
520 $a The process of ethical decision making is holistic and complex with many intricately interrelated components. The use of reason, of the intellect, in arriving at ethical decisions and moral choices is necessarily influenced by an individual's self view, values and world view. Such a phenomenon is best understood through interpreting naturally occurring events. Therefore, this qualitative study utilized intensive open-ended interviewing to investigate nurses' and doctors' self views, world views and cherished values, and how these non-cognitive factors interrelated with their reasoned approaches to, and outcomes of, their ethical decision making.
520 $a Specifically, 21 doctors and nurses were asked to process three clinical cases, each representing a set of conflicts often found in provider:patient interactions in the field of oncology. The transcripts of audiotaped interviews were coded according to selected components/themes often identified in the literature regarding moral reasoning. Content analysis revealed three processing perspectives--the science dominant, the person(s) dominant, and the science-person(s) equilibrium--which orient the health professional to the scope and nature of the dilemma, frame the range of possible, acceptable alternatives, and ultimately are the basis from which practitioners select the best resolution. Thus, processing perspective emerged as the defining feature of the moral dynamic. In general, nurses processed moral dilemmas from the person(s) dominant perspective and doctors from either the science dominant or science-person(s) equilibrium perspective.
520 $a Science dominant processors tend to treat oncology patients and pursue research goals more vigorously than other practitioners. Operating from this perspective makes it more likely that patients will be asked to fit into the prevailing wisdom of science, rather than having what science has to offer be modified for the particular patient. Person(s) dominant processors tend to subject the rigor of science to the special, caring nature of particular patient and nurse-patient relationships. Thus, provisionally, the science-person(s) equilibrium perspective, which synthesizes components of both, emerges both as most respectful of the nature of human beings and human interactions, and most incorporating of the wisdom that medicine, technology and bioethics has to offer decision making. Equilibrium tends to render morally acceptable outcomes.
590 $a School code: 0153.
650 4 $a Education, Philosophy of. $3 783746
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Nursing. $3 1017798
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Education. $3 1017921
690 $a 0998
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0569
690 $a 0350
710 2 0 $a The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. $3 1017449
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 52-01A.
790 1 0 $a Noblit, George W., $e advisor
790 $a 0153
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1990
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=9106132