東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Body, text, and science in the pheno...

Sawicki, Marianne.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Body, text, and science in the phenomenology of Edith Stein.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Body, text, and science in the phenomenology of Edith Stein./
作者:	Sawicki, Marianne.
面頁冊數:	395 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-06, Section: A, page: 2523.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International57-06A.
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9633884

Body, text, and science in the phenomenology of Edith Stein.
Sawicki, Marianne.

Body, text, and science in the phenomenology of Edith Stein. - 395 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-06, Section: A, page: 2523.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Kentucky, 1996.

What is "scientific" about the natural and human sciences? Consensus seems even more distant now than in the early twentieth century, when phenomenologists first addressed this question. Edith Stein (1891-1942) argued that human beings understand the motivated actions of others through a distinctive capacity of subjectivity: egoic following, or Einfuhlung. We also follow the causal chains comprising the coherence of the natural world. The necessity of causality contrasts with the optionality of motivation, but the interplay of the two is essential to the practice of any science.Subjects--Topical Terms:

516511
Philosophy.

Body, text, and science in the phenomenology of Edith Stein.
LDR:03301nmm 2200313 4500 001 1855133
005 20040624070159.5
008 130614s1996 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI9633884
035 $a AAI9633884
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Sawicki, Marianne. $3 1942955
245 1 0 $a Body, text, and science in the phenomenology of Edith Stein.
300 $a 395 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-06, Section: A, page: 2523.
500 $a Director: Ronald Bruzina.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Kentucky, 1996.
520 $a What is "scientific" about the natural and human sciences? Consensus seems even more distant now than in the early twentieth century, when phenomenologists first addressed this question. Edith Stein (1891-1942) argued that human beings understand the motivated actions of others through a distinctive capacity of subjectivity: egoic following, or Einfuhlung. We also follow the causal chains comprising the coherence of the natural world. The necessity of causality contrasts with the optionality of motivation, but the interplay of the two is essential to the practice of any science.
520 $a Stein's hermeneutic (theory of understanding) and her poietic (theory of creative making) were set forth in publications of 1917 and 1922. On the basis of Stein's work, this dissertation explores the literacy of science. The first chapter examines antecedents of phenomenology (Schleiermacher, Dilthey) and the Munich phenomenologists (Lipps, Pfander, Scheler, Conrad-Martius, and Reinach). The second chapter reviews Husserl's work on intersubjectivity up to and including Ideen II--a text shown to be logically incoherent. The third chapter discusses Stein's hermeneutical theory. The fourth chapter examines her hermeneutical practices and classifies her work into anonymous, autographical, and autobiographical writing. It becomes clear that Stein, who worked as Husserl's assistant,, is responsible for Ideen II's argument that the live body is logically prior to object constitution. The fifth chapter surveys divergent interpretations of Stein by education-scientists, theologians, philosophers, feminists, and Jews. Three modes of reading are identified: "docility," "echoing," and "chiseling." The sixth chapter considers recent feminist critiques of science made on psychoanalytic and materialist grounds. These are found to employ deficient modes of reading: "echoing" and "chiseling," respectively, which entail inappropriate deployments of subjectivity. But Stein's poietic theory, presented in her 1922 essay on "psychic causality," approaches science through the interplay of causality and motivation within the live human body itself. The capacity for egoic following (Einfuhlung) among embodied individuals suggests a "realfeminist" philosophy of science, which is here proposed in its basic points with illustrations drawn from practices in contemporary archaeological science.
590 $a School code: 0102.
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Theology. $3 516533
650 4 $a Women's Studies. $3 1017481
650 4 $a History of Science. $3 896972
650 4 $a Biography. $3 531296
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0469
690 $a 0453
690 $a 0585
690 $a 0304
710 2 0 $a University of Kentucky. $3 1017485
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 57-06A.
790 1 0 $a Bruzina, Ronald, $e advisor
790 $a 0102
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1996
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9633884