東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Effects of method of public involvem...

Whitworth, Paul Mitchell.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Effects of method of public involvement and collaboration on agency-stakeholder relations in natural resource planning processes (Utah).

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Effects of method of public involvement and collaboration on agency-stakeholder relations in natural resource planning processes (Utah)./
Author:	Whitworth, Paul Mitchell.
Description:	492 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-05, Section: A, page: 1845.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-05A.
Subject:	Recreation. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3091769

Effects of method of public involvement and collaboration on agency-stakeholder relations in natural resource planning processes (Utah).
Whitworth, Paul Mitchell.

Effects of method of public involvement and collaboration on agency-stakeholder relations in natural resource planning processes (Utah). - 492 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-05, Section: A, page: 1845.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Utah, 2003.

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of method of public involvement and collaboration on stakeholder perceptions of procedural justice, perceived organizational support, control, satisfaction, and organizational commitment in natural resource planning. One hundred twenty-six stakeholders who provided input on planning for the Dixie and Fishlake National Forests in Southern Utah participated. The sample included 113 collaborative meeting respondents (81% response) and 13 written comment respondents (9% response). The study was a two factor, type of involvement by extent of collaboration, ex post facto design. Type of public involvement consisted of four levels: collaborative meetings with small groups (≤10), large groups (≥10), or large groups with individual activities and dialogues with representatives, and written comment. Collaboration was measured through the newly created Stakeholder Collaboration Opportunity and Participation Evaluation (SCOPE) Scale. Dependent variables included measures of neutrality, trust, standing, perceived organizational support, control, satisfaction, general trust, and organizational commitment. Principal components analysis yielded a single component, named “positive relations,” which explained 72% of the variance (<italic>n</italic> = 92) among the set of outcome measures. Linear modeling procedures were used to test the effects of method of input group and degree of collaboration on positive relations (<italic>n</italic> = 96). The <italic>F</italic> ratio for public involvement “group” was significant (<italic>F</italic> = 8.13, <italic>p</italic> < .001). Tukey's HSD indicated that the positive relations score for the large group (<italic>n</italic> = 19) was significantly lower than that for the small group (<italic>n</italic> = 41), large group with individual activities (<italic>n</italic> = 45), and the written comment group (<italic>n</italic> = 12). Results suggest that the use of small groups and large groups with individual activities generate the most positive relations with stakeholders. The written comment technique generated less positive results and the use of large groups with large breakout groups produced the lowest positive relations with stakeholders. Causal modeling techniques were used to evaluate a conceptual causal model among the variables based on procedural justice theory and literature on perceived organizational support and organizational commitment.Subjects--Topical Terms:

535376
Recreation.

Effects of method of public involvement and collaboration on agency-stakeholder relations in natural resource planning processes (Utah).
LDR:03440nmm 2200277 4500 001 1854646
005 20040609163653.5
008 130614s2003 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI3091769
035 $a AAI3091769
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Whitworth, Paul Mitchell. $3 1942477
245 1 0 $a Effects of method of public involvement and collaboration on agency-stakeholder relations in natural resource planning processes (Utah).
300 $a 492 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-05, Section: A, page: 1845.
500 $a Chair: Gary D. Ellis.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Utah, 2003.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of method of public involvement and collaboration on stakeholder perceptions of procedural justice, perceived organizational support, control, satisfaction, and organizational commitment in natural resource planning. One hundred twenty-six stakeholders who provided input on planning for the Dixie and Fishlake National Forests in Southern Utah participated. The sample included 113 collaborative meeting respondents (81% response) and 13 written comment respondents (9% response). The study was a two factor, type of involvement by extent of collaboration, ex post facto design. Type of public involvement consisted of four levels: collaborative meetings with small groups (≤10), large groups (≥10), or large groups with individual activities and dialogues with representatives, and written comment. Collaboration was measured through the newly created Stakeholder Collaboration Opportunity and Participation Evaluation (SCOPE) Scale. Dependent variables included measures of neutrality, trust, standing, perceived organizational support, control, satisfaction, general trust, and organizational commitment. Principal components analysis yielded a single component, named “positive relations,” which explained 72% of the variance (<italic>n</italic> = 92) among the set of outcome measures. Linear modeling procedures were used to test the effects of method of input group and degree of collaboration on positive relations (<italic>n</italic> = 96). The <italic>F</italic> ratio for public involvement “group” was significant (<italic>F</italic> = 8.13, <italic>p</italic> < .001). Tukey's HSD indicated that the positive relations score for the large group (<italic>n</italic> = 19) was significantly lower than that for the small group (<italic>n</italic> = 41), large group with individual activities (<italic>n</italic> = 45), and the written comment group (<italic>n</italic> = 12). Results suggest that the use of small groups and large groups with individual activities generate the most positive relations with stakeholders. The written comment technique generated less positive results and the use of large groups with large breakout groups produced the lowest positive relations with stakeholders. Causal modeling techniques were used to evaluate a conceptual causal model among the variables based on procedural justice theory and literature on perceived organizational support and organizational commitment.
590 $a School code: 0240.
650 4 $a Recreation. $3 535376
650 4 $a Political Science, Public Administration. $3 1017438
650 4 $a Agriculture, Forestry and Wildlife. $3 783690
690 $a 0814
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0478
710 2 0 $a The University of Utah. $3 1017410
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-05A.
790 1 0 $a Ellis, Gary D., $e advisor
790 $a 0240
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3091769