東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Population exchange and peacemaking.

Dark, Michael William Anthony.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Population exchange and peacemaking.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Population exchange and peacemaking./
Author:	Dark, Michael William Anthony.
Description:	284 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-01, Section: A, page: 0335.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-01A.
Subject:	Political Science, International Law and Relations. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3156050
ISBN:	0496928813

Population exchange and peacemaking.
Dark, Michael William Anthony.

Population exchange and peacemaking. - 284 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-01, Section: A, page: 0335.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2005.

Among the many policy solutions debated from the onset of the war in Bosnia in 1992, internationally supervised exchange of minority populations, usually as part of a territorial partition, was a prominent alternative to the peace settlement ultimately reached in 1995. While this outcome was never seriously considered by the international community during peace negotiations over Bosnia, it has played an important role in other peace agreements in the 20th century. This dissertation examines population exchange as part of the peacemaking process during and after major conflicts. Although underlying nationalism is important to these negotiations, parties involved in peacemaking pursue population exchange to insure future security. Moreover, third party peacemakers, accepting the security rationale, are often necessary for exchange to occur. They balance their interests in peacemaking against principled concerns over the rights and humane treatment of those who would be displaced and those who remain.

ISBN: 0496928813Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017399
Political Science, International Law and Relations.

Population exchange and peacemaking.
LDR:03272nmm 2200301 4500 001 1852416
005 20051230065955.5
008 130614s2005 eng d
020 $a 0496928813
035 $a (UnM)AAI3156050
035 $a AAI3156050
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Dark, Michael William Anthony. $3 1940275
245 1 0 $a Population exchange and peacemaking.
300 $a 284 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-01, Section: A, page: 0335.
500 $a Adviser: Michael W. Doyle.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2005.
520 $a Among the many policy solutions debated from the onset of the war in Bosnia in 1992, internationally supervised exchange of minority populations, usually as part of a territorial partition, was a prominent alternative to the peace settlement ultimately reached in 1995. While this outcome was never seriously considered by the international community during peace negotiations over Bosnia, it has played an important role in other peace agreements in the 20th century. This dissertation examines population exchange as part of the peacemaking process during and after major conflicts. Although underlying nationalism is important to these negotiations, parties involved in peacemaking pursue population exchange to insure future security. Moreover, third party peacemakers, accepting the security rationale, are often necessary for exchange to occur. They balance their interests in peacemaking against principled concerns over the rights and humane treatment of those who would be displaced and those who remain.
520 $a This dissertation analyzes four case studies of population exchange negotiations during peacemaking. In the first and second cases, the negotiation of an exchange between Greece and Bulgaria in 1919 and the 1923 Greco-Turkish population exchange, exchange of minorities was acceptable as part of peacemaking because it could secure the peace while being complementary to the development of minority rights guarantees. The third case examines the Czechoslovakian-Hungarian population exchange of 1946 in light of Allied discussions about broader population transfers. Within a context of emerging international human rights at the close of World War II, Allied humanitarian concerns forced bilateral exchange negotiations and limited wider transfers.
520 $a Finally, the case of the Bosnia conflict is taken up to illustrate how the international community's concern for human rights restricted the set of prospective solutions to the conflict, effectively disallowing exchange as a possible outcome. Counterfactual analysis is used to show that without international mediation, parties to the conflict would have negotiated a settlement in which the exchange of minority populations would have been an important component. By the 20th century's end, as peacemaking had become subordinated to international human rights norms, population exchange lost its potential as a peacemaking tool.
590 $a School code: 0181.
650 4 $a Political Science, International Law and Relations. $3 1017399
650 4 $a Sociology, Demography. $3 1020257
690 $a 0616
690 $a 0938
710 2 0 $a Princeton University. $3 645579
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-01A.
790 1 0 $a Doyle, Michael W., $e advisor
790 $a 0181
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3156050