東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Public goods, private incentives, an...

Spielman, David Jon.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Public goods, private incentives, and agricultural R&D: Productivity and poverty in developing country agriculture.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Public goods, private incentives, and agricultural R&D: Productivity and poverty in developing country agriculture./
作者:	Spielman, David Jon.
面頁冊數:	250 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-11, Section: A, page: 4137.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-11A.
標題:	Economics, General. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3112446
ISBN:	0496599585

Public goods, private incentives, and agricultural R&D: Productivity and poverty in developing country agriculture.
Spielman, David Jon.

Public goods, private incentives, and agricultural R&D: Productivity and poverty in developing country agriculture. - 250 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-11, Section: A, page: 4137.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The American University, 2003.

This study examines how market and institutional structures affect the flow and distribution of productivity-enhancing and poverty-reducing agricultural innovations to small-scale farmers, workers and other agrarian agents in developing countries. The study first tests the hypothesis that private sector incentives affect the diffusion of productivity-enhancing technological innovation with a fixed effects panel estimation of yield data for 14 crops cultivated in a large sample of developing countries over a 33 year period (1963--1996). Evidence suggests that the diffusion of productivity-enhancing technologies for major cereal and commercial crops is stimulated by agricultural market growth and stronger intellectual property rights (IPRs) regimes, while the flow of similar technologies for subsistence crops is hindered by stronger forms of legal and technological IPRs, and relatively unaffected by agricultural market growth. Next, the study tests the hypothesis that the institutional design of the international agricultural R&D system affects its productivity-enhancing and poverty-reducing impacts. Based on a comparative historical analysis of the Green Revolution during the 1970s and the emerging agbiotech era, evidence suggests that these impacts cannot be achieved without strategic, international leadership from the public sector in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge and technology in agriculture.

ISBN: 0496599585Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017424
Economics, General.

Public goods, private incentives, and agricultural R&D: Productivity and poverty in developing country agriculture.
LDR:02370nmm 2200277 4500 001 1852403
005 20051230065954.5
008 130614s2003 eng d
020 $a 0496599585
035 $a (UnM)AAI3112446
035 $a AAI3112446
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Spielman, David Jon. $3 1940262
245 1 0 $a Public goods, private incentives, and agricultural R&D: Productivity and poverty in developing country agriculture.
300 $a 250 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-11, Section: A, page: 4137.
500 $a Chair: John Willoughby.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The American University, 2003.
520 $a This study examines how market and institutional structures affect the flow and distribution of productivity-enhancing and poverty-reducing agricultural innovations to small-scale farmers, workers and other agrarian agents in developing countries. The study first tests the hypothesis that private sector incentives affect the diffusion of productivity-enhancing technological innovation with a fixed effects panel estimation of yield data for 14 crops cultivated in a large sample of developing countries over a 33 year period (1963--1996). Evidence suggests that the diffusion of productivity-enhancing technologies for major cereal and commercial crops is stimulated by agricultural market growth and stronger intellectual property rights (IPRs) regimes, while the flow of similar technologies for subsistence crops is hindered by stronger forms of legal and technological IPRs, and relatively unaffected by agricultural market growth. Next, the study tests the hypothesis that the institutional design of the international agricultural R&D system affects its productivity-enhancing and poverty-reducing impacts. Based on a comparative historical analysis of the Green Revolution during the 1970s and the emerging agbiotech era, evidence suggests that these impacts cannot be achieved without strategic, international leadership from the public sector in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge and technology in agriculture.
590 $a School code: 0008.
650 4 $a Economics, General. $3 1017424
650 4 $a Economics, Agricultural. $3 626648
690 $a 0501
690 $a 0503
710 2 0 $a The American University. $3 1017567
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-11A.
790 1 0 $a Willoughby, John, $e advisor
790 $a 0008
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3112446