語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Sustainability, intergenerational eq...
~
Church, Roger.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Sustainability, intergenerational equity and intergenerational justice in forestry.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Sustainability, intergenerational equity and intergenerational justice in forestry./
作者:
Church, Roger.
面頁冊數:
87 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-11, Section: B, page: 5270.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International60-11B.
標題:
Agriculture, Forestry and Wildlife. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9951268
ISBN:
0599544406
Sustainability, intergenerational equity and intergenerational justice in forestry.
Church, Roger.
Sustainability, intergenerational equity and intergenerational justice in forestry.
- 87 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-11, Section: B, page: 5270.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northern Arizona University, 1999.
This study addresses three long-term forest management questions. The first question is whether Australia should be harvesting its native forest or whether plantation forests should provide needed wood fiber. An ecological economics view of sustainability is used to argue for some harvesting of native forest to take place. The argument is that native forests are a conditionally renewable resource and should be used, and plantation forests are not necessarily sustainable given their requirement for non-renewable resources. This native forest harvesting should concentrate on sites, ecosystems, and silvicultural practices that ensure regeneration, maintain site potential, and allow ecologically mature forests to develop. The second question asks how existing linear programming-based forest planning models can be adapted to include some notion of intergenerational equity. Two alternative approaches to modeling are suggested, both based on MAXMIN objective functions. Nominal net revenue and each period's present net worth with values discounted relative to each period are used as criteria for the welfare of each period. These approaches are only a partial solution to considering intergenerational equity in forest planning models, but are proposed as an improvement over current practice since only slight modifications to standard formulations of the forest planning problem are required. The third question is how issues from intergenerational justice and intergenerational equity can be incorporated into forest management. A theoretical framework from intergenerational justice is that the current generation should attempt to act justly toward the future. From this framework, the conservation of options approach to intergenerational equity is selected. If forest condition, as defined by a set of forest compositional and structural classes, is used to represent the options available to the next generation, then the current generation can attempt to act justly toward the future by moving toward a more balanced forest condition. A balanced forest condition represents more options to the next generation than an unbalanced one. Each question addresses the needs of future generations, by passing on conditionally renewable resources, by incorporating intergenerational equity concerns in forest planning, and by attempting to act justly toward the future by passing on a more balanced forest condition.
ISBN: 0599544406Subjects--Topical Terms:
783690
Agriculture, Forestry and Wildlife.
Sustainability, intergenerational equity and intergenerational justice in forestry.
LDR
:03348nmm 2200289 4500
001
1850340
005
20051208095307.5
008
130614s1999 eng d
020
$a
0599544406
035
$a
(UnM)AAI9951268
035
$a
AAI9951268
040
$a
UnM
$c
UnM
100
1
$a
Church, Roger.
$3
1938271
245
1 0
$a
Sustainability, intergenerational equity and intergenerational justice in forestry.
300
$a
87 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-11, Section: B, page: 5270.
500
$a
Chair: Peter J. Daugherty.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northern Arizona University, 1999.
520
$a
This study addresses three long-term forest management questions. The first question is whether Australia should be harvesting its native forest or whether plantation forests should provide needed wood fiber. An ecological economics view of sustainability is used to argue for some harvesting of native forest to take place. The argument is that native forests are a conditionally renewable resource and should be used, and plantation forests are not necessarily sustainable given their requirement for non-renewable resources. This native forest harvesting should concentrate on sites, ecosystems, and silvicultural practices that ensure regeneration, maintain site potential, and allow ecologically mature forests to develop. The second question asks how existing linear programming-based forest planning models can be adapted to include some notion of intergenerational equity. Two alternative approaches to modeling are suggested, both based on MAXMIN objective functions. Nominal net revenue and each period's present net worth with values discounted relative to each period are used as criteria for the welfare of each period. These approaches are only a partial solution to considering intergenerational equity in forest planning models, but are proposed as an improvement over current practice since only slight modifications to standard formulations of the forest planning problem are required. The third question is how issues from intergenerational justice and intergenerational equity can be incorporated into forest management. A theoretical framework from intergenerational justice is that the current generation should attempt to act justly toward the future. From this framework, the conservation of options approach to intergenerational equity is selected. If forest condition, as defined by a set of forest compositional and structural classes, is used to represent the options available to the next generation, then the current generation can attempt to act justly toward the future by moving toward a more balanced forest condition. A balanced forest condition represents more options to the next generation than an unbalanced one. Each question addresses the needs of future generations, by passing on conditionally renewable resources, by incorporating intergenerational equity concerns in forest planning, and by attempting to act justly toward the future by passing on a more balanced forest condition.
590
$a
School code: 0391.
650
4
$a
Agriculture, Forestry and Wildlife.
$3
783690
650
4
$a
Sociology, Public and Social Welfare.
$3
1017909
650
4
$a
Economics, Agricultural.
$3
626648
690
$a
0478
690
$a
0630
690
$a
0503
710
2 0
$a
Northern Arizona University.
$3
783744
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
60-11B.
790
1 0
$a
Daugherty, Peter J.,
$e
advisor
790
$a
0391
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
1999
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9951268
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9199854
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入