東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Comparison of the performance of Uni...

Nabeshima, Shintaro.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Comparison of the performance of United States and Japanese aluminum bats using U.S. and Japanese test protocols.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Comparison of the performance of United States and Japanese aluminum bats using U.S. and Japanese test protocols./
Author:	Nabeshima, Shintaro.
Description:	120 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 42-06, page: 2324.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International42-06.
Subject:	Engineering, Mechanical. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1419774
ISBN:	0496245260

Comparison of the performance of United States and Japanese aluminum bats using U.S. and Japanese test protocols.
Nabeshima, Shintaro.

Comparison of the performance of United States and Japanese aluminum bats using U.S. and Japanese test protocols. - 120 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 42-06, page: 2324.

Thesis (M.S.Eng.)--University of Massachusetts Lowell, 2004.

In 1998, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) took steps to develop a scientific test methodology to measure and to control aluminum baseball bat performance. The resulting standard uses a hitting machine that pitches a ball at a moving bat to measure the BESR (Ball Exit Speed Ratio). Concurrently, the governing body for amateur baseball in Japan developed a test protocol for controlling bat performance. In contrast to the NCAA test methodology, the Japanese protocol uses a series of static tests. This paper compares the two protocol philosophies, presents experimental data highlighting the respective criteria of each approach and discusses how successful each approach has been in controlling the performance of nonwood baseball bats. Comparison data and analysis showed that some Japanese bats marginally outperformed U.S. bats with respect to batted-ball speed. Despite the lack of direct restriction on batted-ball performance using a dynamic test method, the Japanese regulation is controlling the performance of aluminum bats fairly well.

ISBN: 0496245260Subjects--Topical Terms:

783786
Engineering, Mechanical.

Comparison of the performance of United States and Japanese aluminum bats using U.S. and Japanese test protocols.
LDR:02013nmm 2200289 4500 001 1848773
005 20051202071438.5
008 130614s2004 eng d
020 $a 0496245260
035 $a (UnM)AAI1419774
035 $a AAI1419774
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Nabeshima, Shintaro. $3 1936771
245 1 0 $a Comparison of the performance of United States and Japanese aluminum bats using U.S. and Japanese test protocols.
300 $a 120 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 42-06, page: 2324.
500 $a Supervisor: James A. Sherwood.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.Eng.)--University of Massachusetts Lowell, 2004.
520 $a In 1998, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) took steps to develop a scientific test methodology to measure and to control aluminum baseball bat performance. The resulting standard uses a hitting machine that pitches a ball at a moving bat to measure the BESR (Ball Exit Speed Ratio). Concurrently, the governing body for amateur baseball in Japan developed a test protocol for controlling bat performance. In contrast to the NCAA test methodology, the Japanese protocol uses a series of static tests. This paper compares the two protocol philosophies, presents experimental data highlighting the respective criteria of each approach and discusses how successful each approach has been in controlling the performance of nonwood baseball bats. Comparison data and analysis showed that some Japanese bats marginally outperformed U.S. bats with respect to batted-ball speed. Despite the lack of direct restriction on batted-ball performance using a dynamic test method, the Japanese regulation is controlling the performance of aluminum bats fairly well.
590 $a School code: 0111.
650 4 $a Engineering, Mechanical. $3 783786
650 4 $a Recreation. $3 535376
650 4 $a Applied Mechanics. $3 1018410
690 $a 0548
690 $a 0814
690 $a 0346
710 2 0 $a University of Massachusetts Lowell. $3 1017839
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 42-06.
790 1 0 $a Sherwood, James A., $e advisor
790 $a 0111
791 $a M.S.Eng.
792 $a 2004
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1419774