東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Motivations for Enterprise Resource ...

Harrison, Joycelyn L.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Motivations for Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system implementation in public versus private sector organizations.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Motivations for Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system implementation in public versus private sector organizations./
Author:	Harrison, Joycelyn L.
Description:	153 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-01, Section: A, page: 0150.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-01A.
Subject:	Education, Technology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3162216
ISBN:	049695752X

Motivations for Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system implementation in public versus private sector organizations.
Harrison, Joycelyn L.

Motivations for Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system implementation in public versus private sector organizations. - 153 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-01, Section: A, page: 0150.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Central Florida, 2004.

The goal of this research was to increase the knowledge base regarding Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Software implementation, particularly in the public sector. To this end, factors regarding benefits sought through ERP system implementation and critical factors surrounding successful ERP implementation were identified. In addition, the perception of project team members' satisfaction with modules implemented and their concerns about implementing ERP software were identified in this study. The results of this study provided recommendations for public- and private-sector organizations in order to increase their opportunity for successful ERP system implementation.

ISBN: 049695752XSubjects--Topical Terms:

1017498
Education, Technology.

Motivations for Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system implementation in public versus private sector organizations.
LDR:02601nmm 2200313 4500 001 1845482
005 20051101074957.5
008 130614s2004 eng d
020 $a 049695752X
035 $a (UnM)AAI3162216
035 $a AAI3162216
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Harrison, Joycelyn L. $3 1933638
245 1 0 $a Motivations for Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system implementation in public versus private sector organizations.
300 $a 153 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-01, Section: A, page: 0150.
500 $a Adviser: William Bozeman.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Central Florida, 2004.
520 $a The goal of this research was to increase the knowledge base regarding Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Software implementation, particularly in the public sector. To this end, factors regarding benefits sought through ERP system implementation and critical factors surrounding successful ERP implementation were identified. In addition, the perception of project team members' satisfaction with modules implemented and their concerns about implementing ERP software were identified in this study. The results of this study provided recommendations for public- and private-sector organizations in order to increase their opportunity for successful ERP system implementation.
520 $a The literature review and results of this study suggested that the benefits sought during ERP system implementation were consistent among public- and private-sector organizations. Benefits such as increased standardization, better reporting, and reduced operational costs were recognized as goals of ERP software implementation. Factors that attributed to successful ERP system implementations were top management support, and knowledgeable project managers and team members. The t-test analyses found differences among the two groups, public and private sector organizations, regarding some benefits sought and the level of satisfaction with some modules.
520 $a The study included recommendations for organizations to fully research ERP functionality prior to implementation, implement strong change management, use other means of measuring return on investment, ensure employee buy-in and top management involvement, and avoid scope creep.
590 $a School code: 0705.
650 4 $a Education, Technology. $3 1017498
650 4 $a Education, Administration. $3 626645
650 4 $a Education, Finance. $3 1020300
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0514
690 $a 0277
710 2 0 $a University of Central Florida. $3 1018467
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-01A.
790 1 0 $a Bozeman, William, $e advisor
790 $a 0705
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2004
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3162216