語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Morphological and molecular evidence...
~
Geisler, Jonathan Henry.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Morphological and molecular evidence for the phylogeny of Cetacea and Artiodactyla: Explaining incongruence between types of data.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Morphological and molecular evidence for the phylogeny of Cetacea and Artiodactyla: Explaining incongruence between types of data./
作者:
Geisler, Jonathan Henry.
面頁冊數:
475 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-02, Section: B, page: 0752.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International62-02B.
標題:
Paleontology. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3005721
ISBN:
0493152180
Morphological and molecular evidence for the phylogeny of Cetacea and Artiodactyla: Explaining incongruence between types of data.
Geisler, Jonathan Henry.
Morphological and molecular evidence for the phylogeny of Cetacea and Artiodactyla: Explaining incongruence between types of data.
- 475 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-02, Section: B, page: 0752.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2001.
Possible resolutions of the conflict between morphological and molecular evidence for the phylogeny of Odontoceti and Mysticeti and for the phylogeny of Artiodactyla and Cetacea were achieved by compiling extensive anatomical observations and then using these data, in conjunction with previously published nucleotide sequences, to develop and test five hypotheses that explain the incongruence between both types of data. Anatomical observations for 68 cetaceans, artiodactyls, and related taxa were tabulated in a matrix of 186 morphological characters. Cladistic analyses of the data corroborated monophyly of Artiodactyla (even-toed ungulates), Suiformes (hippos, pigs, peccaries), and Neoselenodontia (camels, deer, cows). These results contradict molecule-based studies that support a paraphyletic Artiodactyla, Neoselenodontia, and Suiformes. Instead of these taxa, molecular data supports Whippomorpha (Cetacea and Hippopotamidae) and Cetruminantia (Whippomorpha and ruminants).
ISBN: 0493152180Subjects--Topical Terms:
518862
Paleontology.
Morphological and molecular evidence for the phylogeny of Cetacea and Artiodactyla: Explaining incongruence between types of data.
LDR
:03833nmm 2200301 4500
001
1844786
005
20051017075514.5
008
130614s2001 eng d
020
$a
0493152180
035
$a
(UnM)AAI3005721
035
$a
AAI3005721
040
$a
UnM
$c
UnM
100
1
$a
Geisler, Jonathan Henry.
$3
1932970
245
1 0
$a
Morphological and molecular evidence for the phylogeny of Cetacea and Artiodactyla: Explaining incongruence between types of data.
300
$a
475 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-02, Section: B, page: 0752.
500
$a
Adviser: Malcolm C. McKenna.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2001.
520
$a
Possible resolutions of the conflict between morphological and molecular evidence for the phylogeny of Odontoceti and Mysticeti and for the phylogeny of Artiodactyla and Cetacea were achieved by compiling extensive anatomical observations and then using these data, in conjunction with previously published nucleotide sequences, to develop and test five hypotheses that explain the incongruence between both types of data. Anatomical observations for 68 cetaceans, artiodactyls, and related taxa were tabulated in a matrix of 186 morphological characters. Cladistic analyses of the data corroborated monophyly of Artiodactyla (even-toed ungulates), Suiformes (hippos, pigs, peccaries), and Neoselenodontia (camels, deer, cows). These results contradict molecule-based studies that support a paraphyletic Artiodactyla, Neoselenodontia, and Suiformes. Instead of these taxa, molecular data supports Whippomorpha (Cetacea and Hippopotamidae) and Cetruminantia (Whippomorpha and ruminants).
520
$a
To investigate phylogenetic relationships among whales, I developed a matrix of 304 morphological characters for 52 odontocete and mysticete taxa. All most parsimonious trees for this data include a monophyletic Odontoceti (extant toothed whales) and Mysticeti (baleen-bearing whales). Contrary to previous morphological studies, Squalodontidae and Squalodelphidae are not closely related to Platanistidae. Instead Platanista and other extant river-dwelling odontocetes form a monophyletic Platanistoidea. The most parsimonious trees for morphology contradict previous molecular studies, which claimed that Odontoceti is paraphyletic because Physeteridae (sperm whales) is more closely related to Mysticeti than to other odontocetes.
520
$a
I tested five hypotheses for the phylogenetic incongruence between morphological and molecular data: (1) poorly aligned molecular sequences, (2) randomly distributed observational errors, (3) convergence of molecular characters, (4) interdependence of morphological characters, and (5) convergence of morphological characters. Conflict between evidence for the phylogeny of Odontoceti and Mysticeti is best explained as incorrect alignment of molecular sequences. This hypothesis is supported by the discovery of alternative alignments of cetacean genes that are remarkably congruent with morphological data. Conflict between evidence for the phylogeny of Artiodactyla and Cetacea can be attributed to interdependent morphological characters. Characters within the molar and hindlimb subpartitions are highly compatible with each other. Removal of these subpartitions reduced the incongruence by 22% to 55%. When molecular characters were analyzed with all morphological characters except the molar partition, limited morphological support for Whippomorpha and Cetruminantia appeared in the temporal, orbit edge, and face subpartitions.
590
$a
School code: 0054.
650
4
$a
Paleontology.
$3
518862
650
4
$a
Biology, Zoology.
$3
1018632
690
$a
0418
690
$a
0472
710
2 0
$a
Columbia University.
$3
571054
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
62-02B.
790
1 0
$a
McKenna, Malcolm C.,
$e
advisor
790
$a
0054
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2001
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3005721
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9194300
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入