東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A comparison of three rapid evaluati...

Henderson, Cynthia Joan.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A comparison of three rapid evaluation procedures for pine savanna wetlands.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A comparison of three rapid evaluation procedures for pine savanna wetlands./
作者:	Henderson, Cynthia Joan.
面頁冊數:	87 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 40-02, page: 0490.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International40-02.
標題:	Engineering, Environmental. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1406476
ISBN:	0493394311

A comparison of three rapid evaluation procedures for pine savanna wetlands.
Henderson, Cynthia Joan.

A comparison of three rapid evaluation procedures for pine savanna wetlands. - 87 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 40-02, page: 0490.

Thesis (M.S.)--Mississippi State University, 2001.

Inception of the Clean Water Act in 1972 resulted in regulation of activities in wetlands through Section 404. Regulatory agencies like the Mississippi Department of Marine Resources (MDMR) have tried to find methods to rapidly evaluate wetlands. This study compares three rapid evaluation methods, Hydrogeomorphic Approach (HGM), Wetlands Rapid Assessment Procedure (WRAP), and Wetland Evaluation System (WES), based on their scoring of a group of reference and mitigation wetland sites.

ISBN: 0493394311Subjects--Topical Terms:

783782
Engineering, Environmental.

A comparison of three rapid evaluation procedures for pine savanna wetlands.
LDR:01947nmm 2200313 4500 001 1841394
005 20050908073024.5
008 130614s2001 eng d
020 $a 0493394311
035 $a (UnM)AAI1406476
035 $a AAI1406476
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Henderson, Cynthia Joan. $3 1929696
245 1 2 $a A comparison of three rapid evaluation procedures for pine savanna wetlands.
300 $a 87 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 40-02, page: 0490.
500 $a Adviser: Thomas Cathcart.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Mississippi State University, 2001.
520 $a Inception of the Clean Water Act in 1972 resulted in regulation of activities in wetlands through Section 404. Regulatory agencies like the Mississippi Department of Marine Resources (MDMR) have tried to find methods to rapidly evaluate wetlands. This study compares three rapid evaluation methods, Hydrogeomorphic Approach (HGM), Wetlands Rapid Assessment Procedure (WRAP), and Wetland Evaluation System (WES), based on their scoring of a group of reference and mitigation wetland sites.
520 $a Repeatability was studied by scoring a group of sites twice. The non-parametric Spearman's correlation was used to compare the three methods. In this study, HGM was most repeatable followed by WES and WRAP. Comparisons of overall scores using the Spearman correlation found the strongest correlation between HGM and WES, although all pairings were significantly correlated (p < 0.05). This study determined HGM was the optimum method for the MDMR because due to repeatability and producing results similar to the other two methods.
590 $a School code: 0132.
650 4 $a Engineering, Environmental. $3 783782
650 4 $a Environmental Sciences. $3 676987
650 4 $a Agriculture, Forestry and Wildlife. $3 783690
650 4 $a Biology, Ecology. $3 1017726
690 $a 0775
690 $a 0768
690 $a 0478
690 $a 0329
710 2 0 $a Mississippi State University. $3 1017550
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 40-02.
790 1 0 $a Cathcart, Thomas, $e advisor
790 $a 0132
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2001
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1406476