語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Medusian politics: Walter Benjamin a...
~
Koepnick, Lutz Peter.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Medusian politics: Walter Benjamin and the aesthetics of power.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Medusian politics: Walter Benjamin and the aesthetics of power./
作者:
Koepnick, Lutz Peter.
面頁冊數:
392 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 55-10, Section: A, page: 3202.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International55-10A.
標題:
Literature, Germanic. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9508384
Medusian politics: Walter Benjamin and the aesthetics of power.
Koepnick, Lutz Peter.
Medusian politics: Walter Benjamin and the aesthetics of power.
- 392 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 55-10, Section: A, page: 3202.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 1994.
Although much debated, Walter Benjamin's 1935/36 remarks about the aesthetic moment in modern politics and his related critique of fascism remains enigmatic. The dissertation unfolds the multifaceted implications of Benjamin's aestheticization thesis, considering his positioning of art, mass culture, and political legitimation as perhaps the most relevant legacy of the Frankfurt School today. As it first traces earlier attempts to separate and collapse the spheres of artistic expression and political representation, and then situates Benjamin's comments on art and power in fascism vis-a-vis his entire oeuvre, the dissertation identifies crucial shortcomings of the aestheticization thesis, but also suggests avenues to bypass built-in dilemmas for a better understanding of postmodern scopic politics.Subjects--Topical Terms:
1019072
Literature, Germanic.
Medusian politics: Walter Benjamin and the aesthetics of power.
LDR
:03288nmm 2200301 4500
001
1840148
005
20050714101547.5
008
130614s1994 eng d
035
$a
(UnM)AAI9508384
035
$a
AAI9508384
040
$a
UnM
$c
UnM
100
1
$a
Koepnick, Lutz Peter.
$3
1928496
245
1 0
$a
Medusian politics: Walter Benjamin and the aesthetics of power.
300
$a
392 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 55-10, Section: A, page: 3202.
500
$a
Adviser: Russell A. Berman.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 1994.
520
$a
Although much debated, Walter Benjamin's 1935/36 remarks about the aesthetic moment in modern politics and his related critique of fascism remains enigmatic. The dissertation unfolds the multifaceted implications of Benjamin's aestheticization thesis, considering his positioning of art, mass culture, and political legitimation as perhaps the most relevant legacy of the Frankfurt School today. As it first traces earlier attempts to separate and collapse the spheres of artistic expression and political representation, and then situates Benjamin's comments on art and power in fascism vis-a-vis his entire oeuvre, the dissertation identifies crucial shortcomings of the aestheticization thesis, but also suggests avenues to bypass built-in dilemmas for a better understanding of postmodern scopic politics.
520
$a
Part One discusses how numerous German authors and artists between the late 1800s and the 1930s considered art a vessel to reinstate cultic communities and stable forms of political authority. In all these models, art, emancipated from classical autonomy aesthetics, is mobilized to dedifferentiate the institutional complexity of modern Germany. Part Two explores the triple sense of what Benjamin understands as aesthetic politics: the confusion of different modes of judgement, the attempt to superimpose on political practices the aesthetic notion of genius, and finally, the regime of visual modes of political representation that transfixes the masses as mute spectators within the aesthetic configuration of the Volksgemeinschaft. In contrast to recent critiques, Benjamin locates the fusion of art and politics within a broader theory of capitalist modernity: modern societies, he argues, address desires for distraction to the extent that they need to generate new sources of legitimacy against the grain of social fragmentation.
520
$a
If the dissertation cites the image of Medusa's gaze, so not simply to understand Benjamin's account of fascism in terms of a petrification of political mobility, but also a precarious feminization of the public sphere that undermines proper judgement, moral reflexivity, and representational authenticity. Although hailed in recent years as an advocate of otherness and non-identity, Benjamin's concept of aesthetic politics relies on a problematic notion of gender identity as he grafts male anxieties onto his theory of modern visuality.
590
$a
School code: 0212.
650
4
$a
Literature, Germanic.
$3
1019072
650
4
$a
Philosophy.
$3
516511
650
4
$a
History, European.
$3
1018076
690
$a
0311
690
$a
0422
690
$a
0335
710
2 0
$a
Stanford University.
$3
754827
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
55-10A.
790
1 0
$a
Berman, Russell A.,
$e
advisor
790
$a
0212
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
1994
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9508384
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9189662
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入