東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A field experimental study of natura...

Ngo, Lisa Ha T.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A field experimental study of natural language versus Boolean searching.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A field experimental study of natural language versus Boolean searching./
作者:	Ngo, Lisa Ha T.
面頁冊數:	42 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 45-02, page: 0514.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International45-02.
標題:	Library Science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1438585
ISBN:	9780542919183

A field experimental study of natural language versus Boolean searching.
Ngo, Lisa Ha T.

A field experimental study of natural language versus Boolean searching. - 42 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 45-02, page: 0514.

Thesis (M.L.I.S.)--San Jose State University, 2006.

This field experimental study compares the effectiveness of natural language search with Boolean search with broad queries in an academic environment. Sample queries were collected from undergraduate students with actual information needs at San Jose State University and searched in a heavily used database available at the university library; the numbers of retrieved citations, retrieved relevant citations, and retrieved unique relevant citations were analyzed. Natural language search retrieved a significantly larger number of total citations for both broad and narrow queries. For broad queries, no significant difference between natural language search and Boolean search was found in either the number of relevant citations or the number of unique relevant citations retrieved. However, for narrow queries, Boolean search was found to be far more successful in terms of the numbers of relevant and unique relevant citations retrieved. Implications of these findings for students, database designers, and librarians are discussed.

ISBN: 9780542919183Subjects--Topical Terms:

881164
Library Science.

A field experimental study of natural language versus Boolean searching.
LDR:01908nmm 2200277 4500 001 1831661
005 20070518124351.5
008 130610s2006 eng d
020 $a 9780542919183
035 $a (UnM)AAI1438585
035 $a AAI1438585
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Ngo, Lisa Ha T. $3 1920433
245 1 2 $a A field experimental study of natural language versus Boolean searching.
300 $a 42 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 45-02, page: 0514.
500 $a Adviser: Geoffrey Z. Liu.
502 $a Thesis (M.L.I.S.)--San Jose State University, 2006.
520 $a This field experimental study compares the effectiveness of natural language search with Boolean search with broad queries in an academic environment. Sample queries were collected from undergraduate students with actual information needs at San Jose State University and searched in a heavily used database available at the university library; the numbers of retrieved citations, retrieved relevant citations, and retrieved unique relevant citations were analyzed. Natural language search retrieved a significantly larger number of total citations for both broad and narrow queries. For broad queries, no significant difference between natural language search and Boolean search was found in either the number of relevant citations or the number of unique relevant citations retrieved. However, for narrow queries, Boolean search was found to be far more successful in terms of the numbers of relevant and unique relevant citations retrieved. Implications of these findings for students, database designers, and librarians are discussed.
590 $a School code: 6265.
650 4 $a Library Science. $3 881164
650 4 $a Information Science. $3 1017528
690 $a 0399
690 $a 0723
710 2 0 $a San Jose State University. $3 1020800
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 45-02.
790 1 0 $a Liu, Geoffrey Z., $e advisor
790 $a 6265
791 $a M.L.I.S.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1438585