東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Institutional factors and perception...

Dane, Emily Ann.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Institutional factors and perceptions of key decision makers related to program approval status of sport management master's degree programs in the United States.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Institutional factors and perceptions of key decision makers related to program approval status of sport management master's degree programs in the United States./
作者:	Dane, Emily Ann.
面頁冊數:	182 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-08, Section: A, page: 2856.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-08A.
標題:	Education, Administration. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3227539
ISBN:	9780542813269

Institutional factors and perceptions of key decision makers related to program approval status of sport management master's degree programs in the United States.
Dane, Emily Ann.

Institutional factors and perceptions of key decision makers related to program approval status of sport management master's degree programs in the United States. - 182 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-08, Section: A, page: 2856.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2006.

The purpose of this study was to examine approval status and the rationale surrounding approval status within sport management master's degree programs within the United States. Five demographic factors (type of master's degree offered, college within which the sport management program is housed in, number of full time faculty, date of program inception, and athletic classification) were selected and examined to determine if there was any relationship between these factors and NASSM approval status. In addition, rationales were gathered from key decision makers to determine why programs chose to seek approval and why some chose to remain independent. Finally, data were collected to determine to what extent non-approved programs were utilizing curricular standards established by NASSM.

ISBN: 9780542813269Subjects--Topical Terms:

626645
Education, Administration.

Institutional factors and perceptions of key decision makers related to program approval status of sport management master's degree programs in the United States.
LDR:02752nmm 2200289 4500 001 1830011
005 20070329084936.5
008 130610s2006 eng d
020 $a 9780542813269
035 $a (UnM)AAI3227539
035 $a AAI3227539
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Dane, Emily Ann. $3 1918857
245 1 0 $a Institutional factors and perceptions of key decision makers related to program approval status of sport management master's degree programs in the United States.
300 $a 182 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-08, Section: A, page: 2856.
500 $a Adviser: Mary Jo Kane.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2006.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to examine approval status and the rationale surrounding approval status within sport management master's degree programs within the United States. Five demographic factors (type of master's degree offered, college within which the sport management program is housed in, number of full time faculty, date of program inception, and athletic classification) were selected and examined to determine if there was any relationship between these factors and NASSM approval status. In addition, rationales were gathered from key decision makers to determine why programs chose to seek approval and why some chose to remain independent. Finally, data were collected to determine to what extent non-approved programs were utilizing curricular standards established by NASSM.
520 $a An original web-based survey instrument was created to ascertain the significance of institutional factors on seeking program approval status, as well as perceptions of key decision makers. Ninety-four of the 100 institutions that currently offer master's programs were contacted via email. Forty-eight of the 94 surveys (51 %) were successfully completed. Results indicated that no institutional factor was significantly more likely to be represented in approved and non-approved programs. Approved programs cited the rationale of internal and external prestige as a common reason for seeking approval. Non-approved programs cited their service to a specialized population or a desire to be unique as reasons not to seek program approval status. Although many non-approved programs have not sought the label of approval, results demonstrate majority still utilize (in some capacity) the curricular standards established by NASSM in within their master's degree programs.
590 $a School code: 0130.
650 4 $a Education, Administration. $3 626645
650 4 $a Education, Business. $3 1017515
690 $a 0514
690 $a 0688
710 2 0 $a University of Minnesota. $3 676231
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-08A.
790 1 0 $a Kane, Mary Jo, $e advisor
790 $a 0130
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3227539