東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The ideal and the actual of James Co...

Grossman, Lewis Adam.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The ideal and the actual of James Coolidge Carter: Morality and law in the Gilded Age (David Dudley Fields, Christopher Columbus Langdell).

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The ideal and the actual of James Coolidge Carter: Morality and law in the Gilded Age (David Dudley Fields, Christopher Columbus Langdell)./
作者:	Grossman, Lewis Adam.
面頁冊數:	420 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-03, Section: A, page: 1130.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-03A.
標題:	History, United States. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3168900
ISBN:	9780542048586

The ideal and the actual of James Coolidge Carter: Morality and law in the Gilded Age (David Dudley Fields, Christopher Columbus Langdell).
Grossman, Lewis Adam.

The ideal and the actual of James Coolidge Carter: Morality and law in the Gilded Age (David Dudley Fields, Christopher Columbus Langdell). - 420 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-03, Section: A, page: 1130.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Yale University, 2005.

James Coolidge Carter (1827--1905) was the chief representative of the American school of historical jurisprudence, a prominent Supreme Court advocate, an influential municipal reformer, and the leading opponent of David Dudley Fields's campaign to codify the common law. Carter does not conform to the standard portraits of Gilded Age jurists painted by historians. He was not a laissez-faire extremist in the thrall of big business, nor was he a direct intellectual descendant of the antebellum Jacksonians. Furthermore, he did not depict common law judging as an amoral exercise in logical formalism. On the contrary, Carter's jurisprudence was rooted firmly in ethics, although the social and economic developments of the late nineteenth century placed his ethical system under enormous strain.

ISBN: 9780542048586Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017393
History, United States.

The ideal and the actual of James Coolidge Carter: Morality and law in the Gilded Age (David Dudley Fields, Christopher Columbus Langdell).
LDR:03504nmm 2200337 4500 001 1827833
005 20061228142204.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780542048586
035 $a (UnM)AAI3168900
035 $a AAI3168900
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Grossman, Lewis Adam. $3 1916750
245 1 4 $a The ideal and the actual of James Coolidge Carter: Morality and law in the Gilded Age (David Dudley Fields, Christopher Columbus Langdell).
300 $a 420 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-03, Section: A, page: 1130.
500 $a Directors: David Brion Davis; Robert W. Gordon.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Yale University, 2005.
520 $a James Coolidge Carter (1827--1905) was the chief representative of the American school of historical jurisprudence, a prominent Supreme Court advocate, an influential municipal reformer, and the leading opponent of David Dudley Fields's campaign to codify the common law. Carter does not conform to the standard portraits of Gilded Age jurists painted by historians. He was not a laissez-faire extremist in the thrall of big business, nor was he a direct intellectual descendant of the antebellum Jacksonians. Furthermore, he did not depict common law judging as an amoral exercise in logical formalism. On the contrary, Carter's jurisprudence was rooted firmly in ethics, although the social and economic developments of the late nineteenth century placed his ethical system under enormous strain.
520 $a Carter, like many elite legal figures of his time, belonged to the genteel "Mugwump" political culture of the northeastern cities. This dissertation shows how Carter's jurisprudence reflected his Mugwump world view. It also explores how he, like other Mugwumps, struggled to accommodate older modes of thought to the challenges of modernity. Despite the antilegislative theme of his jurisprudence, Carter increasingly acknowledged the need for positive government in an urban and industrial society. Moreover, he merged a traditional faith in timeless moral principles with a focus on evolving customary norms.
520 $a The dissertation then examines the striking contrast between Carter's vision of legal decision making and the highly conceptual and rigidly logical jurisprudence of his contemporary, Christopher Columbus Langdell. Carter, foreshadowing the legal realists, believed common law principles and rules were indeterminate. He depicted the common law as a system that permitted judges to decide each case fairly according to its particular facts.
520 $a After analyzing the relationship of Carter's thought to German and English historical jurisprudence, the dissertation explores his career as a practicing attorney. It considers how he attempted to reconcile his Mugwump reformism with his work as a corporate litigator. In addition it demonstrates how his arguments in court reflected his jurisprudential and moral theories. Finally, the dissertation discusses the reception of Carter by twentieth-century legal scholars, who rejected and ultimately ignored him, despite the various ways his thought anticipated their own.
590 $a School code: 0265.
650 4 $a History, United States. $3 1017393
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Biography. $3 531296
690 $a 0337
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0304
710 2 0 $a Yale University. $3 515640
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-03A.
790 1 0 $a Davis, David Brion, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Gordon, Robert W., $e advisor
790 $a 0265
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3168900