東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Limit analysis of soil slope stabili...

Kim, Jongmin.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Limit analysis of soil slope stability using finite elements and linear programming.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Limit analysis of soil slope stability using finite elements and linear programming./
作者:	Kim, Jongmin.
面頁冊數:	205 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 59-12, Section: B, page: 6412.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International59-12B.
標題:	Engineering, Civil. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9914510
ISBN:	9780599131378

Limit analysis of soil slope stability using finite elements and linear programming.
Kim, Jongmin.

Limit analysis of soil slope stability using finite elements and linear programming. - 205 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 59-12, Section: B, page: 6412.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Purdue University, 1998.

Stability and deformation problems in geotechnical engineering are boundary value problems: differential equations must be solved for given boundary conditions. Solutions are found by solving differential equations derived from conditions of equilibrium, compatibility, and the soil constitutive relations, subjected to boundary conditions. For stability problems, the theory of plasticity is used to set up the differential equations. The limit equilibrium method is commonly used for slope stability analysis. However, it is well known that the solution obtained from the limit equilibrium method is not rigorous, because neither static nor kinematic admissibility conditions are satisfied. Limit analysis takes advantage of lower and upper bound theorems to provide relatively simple, but rigorous bounds on the true solution. Therefore, limit analysis is an efficient benchmarking method to check the validity of solutions obtained by the limit equilibrium methods. In this study, three-noded linear triangular finite elements are used to construct both statically admissible stress fields for lower bound analysis and kinematically admissible velocity fields for upper bound analysis. By assuming linear variation of nodal variables, the determination of the best lower and upper bound solution may be set up as a linear programming problem with constraints based on the satisfaction of static and kinematic admissibility. The effects of porewater pressures are considered and incorporated into the finite element formulations so that the effective stress analysis of saturated slopes may be done. Results obtained from limit analysis of homogeneous simple slopes with different ground water patterns are presented in the form of stability charts, and compared with those obtained from the limit equilibrium method. For more general problem---slopes with inhomogeneous soil profiles, arbitrary ground surface and water table, the lower and upper bounds to the true factor of safety are calculated directly using the numerical procedure. Various examples of slopes are selected from the literature and the results of limit analysis and limit equilibrium analysis of these slopes are compared.

ISBN: 9780599131378Subjects--Topical Terms:

783781
Engineering, Civil.

Limit analysis of soil slope stability using finite elements and linear programming.
LDR:03182nmm 2200301 4500 001 1824723
005 20061206120120.5
008 130610s1998 eng d
020 $a 9780599131378
035 $a (UnM)AAI9914510
035 $a AAI9914510
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Kim, Jongmin. $3 1900528
245 1 0 $a Limit analysis of soil slope stability using finite elements and linear programming.
300 $a 205 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 59-12, Section: B, page: 6412.
500 $a Major Professors: Rodrigo Salgado; Charles W. Lovell.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Purdue University, 1998.
520 $a Stability and deformation problems in geotechnical engineering are boundary value problems: differential equations must be solved for given boundary conditions. Solutions are found by solving differential equations derived from conditions of equilibrium, compatibility, and the soil constitutive relations, subjected to boundary conditions. For stability problems, the theory of plasticity is used to set up the differential equations. The limit equilibrium method is commonly used for slope stability analysis. However, it is well known that the solution obtained from the limit equilibrium method is not rigorous, because neither static nor kinematic admissibility conditions are satisfied. Limit analysis takes advantage of lower and upper bound theorems to provide relatively simple, but rigorous bounds on the true solution. Therefore, limit analysis is an efficient benchmarking method to check the validity of solutions obtained by the limit equilibrium methods. In this study, three-noded linear triangular finite elements are used to construct both statically admissible stress fields for lower bound analysis and kinematically admissible velocity fields for upper bound analysis. By assuming linear variation of nodal variables, the determination of the best lower and upper bound solution may be set up as a linear programming problem with constraints based on the satisfaction of static and kinematic admissibility. The effects of porewater pressures are considered and incorporated into the finite element formulations so that the effective stress analysis of saturated slopes may be done. Results obtained from limit analysis of homogeneous simple slopes with different ground water patterns are presented in the form of stability charts, and compared with those obtained from the limit equilibrium method. For more general problem---slopes with inhomogeneous soil profiles, arbitrary ground surface and water table, the lower and upper bounds to the true factor of safety are calculated directly using the numerical procedure. Various examples of slopes are selected from the literature and the results of limit analysis and limit equilibrium analysis of these slopes are compared.
590 $a School code: 0183.
650 4 $a Engineering, Civil. $3 783781
650 4 $a Geotechnology. $3 1018558
650 4 $a Geology. $3 516570
690 $a 0543
690 $a 0428
690 $a 0372
710 2 0 $a Purdue University. $3 1017663
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 59-12B.
790 1 0 $a Salgado, Rodrigo, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Lovell, Charles W., $e advisor
790 $a 0183
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1998
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9914510