東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A standardized performance assessmen...

Rogers, Jeffrey William.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A standardized performance assessment and evaluation model for community water systems.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A standardized performance assessment and evaluation model for community water systems./
作者:	Rogers, Jeffrey William.
面頁冊數:	431 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-03, Section: B, page: 1698.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-03B.
標題:	Engineering, System Science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3169699
ISBN:	9780542058134

A standardized performance assessment and evaluation model for community water systems.
Rogers, Jeffrey William.

A standardized performance assessment and evaluation model for community water systems. - 431 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-03, Section: B, page: 1698.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Virginia, 2005.

The community water systems (CWS) sector is facing significant external forces for change from decreasing water resource availability, stricter water quality regulations, decreasing federal subsidies, increasing public scrutiny, decreasing financial health, increasing environmental impact, increasing social impact, and increasing infrastructure replacement costs. These forces necessitate greater accountability by CWS to their stakeholders.

ISBN: 9780542058134Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018128
Engineering, System Science.

A standardized performance assessment and evaluation model for community water systems.
LDR:03429nmm 2200301 4500 001 1823425
005 20061130142443.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780542058134
035 $a (UnM)AAI3169699
035 $a AAI3169699
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Rogers, Jeffrey William. $3 1912534
245 1 2 $a A standardized performance assessment and evaluation model for community water systems.
300 $a 431 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-03, Section: B, page: 1698.
500 $a Adviser: Garrick E. Louis.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Virginia, 2005.
520 $a The community water systems (CWS) sector is facing significant external forces for change from decreasing water resource availability, stricter water quality regulations, decreasing federal subsidies, increasing public scrutiny, decreasing financial health, increasing environmental impact, increasing social impact, and increasing infrastructure replacement costs. These forces necessitate greater accountability by CWS to their stakeholders.
520 $a The goal of this study is to improve the accountability of CWS to their stakeholders. The thesis of this study is that increased accountability is achievable by means of a standardized method for performance assessment and evaluation (PAE) of CWS within a regional water system (RWS). Furthermore, the thesis postulates, that improved accountability achieved through this standardized PAE method permits greater efficiency in the allocation of limited financial resources to CWS that operate as a RWS.
520 $a This research develops the model for such a standardized PAE method. The objectives of the model are to: (1) Provide a standardized method for performance assessment of CWS operating as a RWS. The standardized performance assessment method is built from the existing performance assessment methods that are used in the sector; (2) Provide a method for summative evaluation of performance that permits benchmarked comparison of CWS operating as a RWS; and (3) Increase the accountability of CWS to their stakeholders through a transparent and consistent method for assessing their performance and evaluating the assessment results.
520 $a The objectives are achieved by adapting the pedagogies of systems analysis (SA) and multiobjective decision analysis (MODA) to the application of PAE for CWS. Thus SA techniques are modified to develop a universal goal and associated objectives for CWS. The MODA techniques are modified to elicit stakeholder preferences and consensus measures of performance for impact management in the form of strategic planning. The overall effects of these modifications are to balance individual CWSP resource allocations with the universal goal of the RWS. This combination of the SA and MODA techniques provide the foundation for a standardized PAE model to: (1) Close CWS financial resource gap by ensuring effective allocation policies are enacted; and (2) Enhance CWS accountability through uniform and consistent performance metrics and assessment methods that are understandable to all stakeholders. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
590 $a School code: 0246.
650 4 $a Engineering, System Science. $3 1018128
690 $a 0790
710 2 0 $a University of Virginia. $3 645578
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-03B.
790 1 0 $a Louis, Garrick E., $e advisor
790 $a 0246
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3169699