東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A philosophical examination of Mead'...

Furbish, Dean Russel.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A philosophical examination of Mead's pragmatist constructivism as a referent for adult science education (George Herbert Mead).

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A philosophical examination of Mead's pragmatist constructivism as a referent for adult science education (George Herbert Mead)./
作者:	Furbish, Dean Russel.
面頁冊數:	302 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-05, Section: A, page: 1593.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-05A.
標題:	Education, Adult and Continuing. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3175923
ISBN:	9780542141607

A philosophical examination of Mead's pragmatist constructivism as a referent for adult science education (George Herbert Mead).
Furbish, Dean Russel.

A philosophical examination of Mead's pragmatist constructivism as a referent for adult science education (George Herbert Mead). - 302 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-05, Section: A, page: 1593.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--North Carolina State University, 2005.

The purpose of this study is to examine pragmatist constructivism as a science education referent for adult learners. Specifically, this study seeks to determine whether George Herbert Mead's doctrine, which conflates pragmatist learning theory and philosophy of natural science, might facilitate (a) scientific concept acquisition, (b) learning scientific methods, and (c) preparation of learners for careers in science and science-related areas. A philosophical examination of Mead's doctrine in light of these three criteria has determined that pragmatist constructivism is not a viable science education referent for adult learners. Mead's pragmatist constructivism does not portray scientific knowledge or scientific methods as they are understood by practicing scientists themselves, that is, according to scientific realism. Thus, employment of pragmatist constructivism does not adequately prepare future practitioners for careers in science-related areas. Mead's metaphysics does not allow him to commit to the existence of the unobservable objects of science such as molecular cellulose or mosquito-borne malarial parasites. Mead's anti-realist metaphysics also affects his conception of scientific methods. Because Mead does not commit existentially to the unobservable objects of realist science, Mead's science does not seek to determine what causal role if any the hypothetical objects that scientists routinely posit while theorizing might play in observable phenomena. Instead, constructivist pragmatism promotes subjective epistemology and instrumental methods. The implication for learning science is that students are encouraged to derive scientific concepts based on a combination of personal experience and personal meaningfulness. Contrary to pragmatist constructivism, however, scientific concepts do not arise inductively from subjective experience driven by personal interests. The broader implication of this study for adult education is that the philosophically laden claims of constructivist learning theories need to be identified and assessed independently of any empirical support that these learning theories might enjoy. This in turn calls for educational experiences for graduate students of education that incorporate philosophical understanding such that future educators might be able to recognize and weigh the philosophically laden claims of adult learning theories.

ISBN: 9780542141607Subjects--Topical Terms:

626632
Education, Adult and Continuing.

A philosophical examination of Mead's pragmatist constructivism as a referent for adult science education (George Herbert Mead).
LDR:03376nmm 2200289 4500 001 1822538
005 20061129144525.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780542141607
035 $a (UnM)AAI3175923
035 $a AAI3175923
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Furbish, Dean Russel. $3 1911678
245 1 2 $a A philosophical examination of Mead's pragmatist constructivism as a referent for adult science education (George Herbert Mead).
300 $a 302 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-05, Section: A, page: 1593.
500 $a Chair: Carol E. Kasworm.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--North Carolina State University, 2005.
520 $a The purpose of this study is to examine pragmatist constructivism as a science education referent for adult learners. Specifically, this study seeks to determine whether George Herbert Mead's doctrine, which conflates pragmatist learning theory and philosophy of natural science, might facilitate (a) scientific concept acquisition, (b) learning scientific methods, and (c) preparation of learners for careers in science and science-related areas. A philosophical examination of Mead's doctrine in light of these three criteria has determined that pragmatist constructivism is not a viable science education referent for adult learners. Mead's pragmatist constructivism does not portray scientific knowledge or scientific methods as they are understood by practicing scientists themselves, that is, according to scientific realism. Thus, employment of pragmatist constructivism does not adequately prepare future practitioners for careers in science-related areas. Mead's metaphysics does not allow him to commit to the existence of the unobservable objects of science such as molecular cellulose or mosquito-borne malarial parasites. Mead's anti-realist metaphysics also affects his conception of scientific methods. Because Mead does not commit existentially to the unobservable objects of realist science, Mead's science does not seek to determine what causal role if any the hypothetical objects that scientists routinely posit while theorizing might play in observable phenomena. Instead, constructivist pragmatism promotes subjective epistemology and instrumental methods. The implication for learning science is that students are encouraged to derive scientific concepts based on a combination of personal experience and personal meaningfulness. Contrary to pragmatist constructivism, however, scientific concepts do not arise inductively from subjective experience driven by personal interests. The broader implication of this study for adult education is that the philosophically laden claims of constructivist learning theories need to be identified and assessed independently of any empirical support that these learning theories might enjoy. This in turn calls for educational experiences for graduate students of education that incorporate philosophical understanding such that future educators might be able to recognize and weigh the philosophically laden claims of adult learning theories.
590 $a School code: 0155.
650 4 $a Education, Adult and Continuing. $3 626632
650 4 $a Education, Philosophy of. $3 783746
650 4 $a Education, Sciences. $3 1017897
690 $a 0516
690 $a 0998
690 $a 0714
710 2 0 $a North Carolina State University. $3 1018772
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-05A.
790 1 0 $a Kasworm, Carol E., $e advisor
790 $a 0155
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3175923