東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Do value and growth firms differ in ...

Madhogarhia, Pawan Kumar.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Do value and growth firms differ in their earnings management practices?

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Do value and growth firms differ in their earnings management practices?/
作者:	Madhogarhia, Pawan Kumar.
面頁冊數:	104 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-01, Section: A, page: 0258.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-01A.
標題:	Business Administration, Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3201850
ISBN:	9780542496080

Do value and growth firms differ in their earnings management practices?
Madhogarhia, Pawan Kumar.

Do value and growth firms differ in their earnings management practices? - 104 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-01, Section: A, page: 0258.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Mississippi State University, 2005.

This research examines earnings management practices of growth vis-a-vis value firms. It proposes that growth firms have more of an incentive to 'manage their earnings' and that they do so more aggressively as compared to value firms. A major reason for this behavior is that information asymmetries are much higher for growth firms. This study finds that, on an average, based on the absolute values of discretionary negative total accruals during the period 1997 through 2001, growth firms manage their earnings downward more aggressively than do value firms. In addition, based on the absolute values of discretionary negative current accruals, growth firms manage their earnings downward more aggressively than do value firms. Also, based on discretionary long-term accruals, during this period, growth firms manage their earnings both upward and downward more aggressively relative to value firms. The analyses by year reveal that differences in earnings management by growth and value firms were more pronounced in the years 2000 and 2001. Also, the analyses by year did not detect significant differences in earnings management practices between growth and value firms for the remaining years examined, that is, 2002 and 2003. This outcome could possibly be attributed to either a reduction in earnings management practices by both growth and value firms or that for the period after 2001, growth firms did not manage their earnings differently from value firms. This issue is left for future research.

ISBN: 9780542496080Subjects--Topical Terms:

626628
Business Administration, Management.

Do value and growth firms differ in their earnings management practices?
LDR:03003nmm 2200301 4500 001 1821306
005 20061115073005.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780542496080
035 $a (UnM)AAI3201850
035 $a AAI3201850
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Madhogarhia, Pawan Kumar. $3 1910495
245 1 0 $a Do value and growth firms differ in their earnings management practices?
300 $a 104 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-01, Section: A, page: 0258.
500 $a Adviser: Theodor Kohers.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Mississippi State University, 2005.
520 $a This research examines earnings management practices of growth vis-a-vis value firms. It proposes that growth firms have more of an incentive to 'manage their earnings' and that they do so more aggressively as compared to value firms. A major reason for this behavior is that information asymmetries are much higher for growth firms. This study finds that, on an average, based on the absolute values of discretionary negative total accruals during the period 1997 through 2001, growth firms manage their earnings downward more aggressively than do value firms. In addition, based on the absolute values of discretionary negative current accruals, growth firms manage their earnings downward more aggressively than do value firms. Also, based on discretionary long-term accruals, during this period, growth firms manage their earnings both upward and downward more aggressively relative to value firms. The analyses by year reveal that differences in earnings management by growth and value firms were more pronounced in the years 2000 and 2001. Also, the analyses by year did not detect significant differences in earnings management practices between growth and value firms for the remaining years examined, that is, 2002 and 2003. This outcome could possibly be attributed to either a reduction in earnings management practices by both growth and value firms or that for the period after 2001, growth firms did not manage their earnings differently from value firms. This issue is left for future research.
520 $a This study compares two broad investment categories, that is, growth and value firms. By comparing earnings management practices within investment categories as well as across categories which operate with differing earnings management characteristics, a new approach is developed which may prove beneficial for further research in the field of earnings management and investment categories. The results of this study provide useful insights into how investors incorporate the perceived earnings management practices of growth and value firms in pricing these stocks.
590 $a School code: 0132.
650 4 $a Business Administration, Management. $3 626628
650 4 $a Business Administration, Accounting. $3 1020666
650 4 $a Business Administration, Banking. $3 1018458
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0272
690 $a 0770
710 2 0 $a Mississippi State University. $3 1017550
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-01A.
790 1 0 $a Kohers, Theodor, $e advisor
790 $a 0132
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3201850