東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The evolution of the non-supplant is...

Burnette, Mark A.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The evolution of the non-supplant issue in the federal funding of public education: The policy in Virginia and its national implications.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The evolution of the non-supplant issue in the federal funding of public education: The policy in Virginia and its national implications./
Author:	Burnette, Mark A.
Description:	162 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-02, Section: A, page: 0499.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-02A.
Subject:	Education, Finance. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3164098
ISBN:	0496983474

The evolution of the non-supplant issue in the federal funding of public education: The policy in Virginia and its national implications.
Burnette, Mark A.

The evolution of the non-supplant issue in the federal funding of public education: The policy in Virginia and its national implications. - 162 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-02, Section: A, page: 0499.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2005.

The primary purpose of this study is to assist with the determination of the legality of the policy adopted by the Commonwealth of Virginia of deducting certain federal revenues from the Basic Aid finance formula for public education. First, this study involves a detailed review of the case law pertaining to the non-supplant issue with targeted federal funds. Second, a brief description of the funding models of the time utilized by the states involved in such litigation are provided in order to determine similarities and differences to various state funding systems, including the venerable foundation model utilized by Virginia.

ISBN: 0496983474Subjects--Topical Terms:

1020300
Education, Finance.

The evolution of the non-supplant issue in the federal funding of public education: The policy in Virginia and its national implications.
LDR:03345nmm 2200337 4500 001 1817284
005 20060814144345.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 0496983474
035 $a (UnM)AAI3164098
035 $a AAI3164098
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Burnette, Mark A. $3 1906642
245 1 4 $a The evolution of the non-supplant issue in the federal funding of public education: The policy in Virginia and its national implications.
300 $a 162 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-02, Section: A, page: 0499.
500 $a Chair: Richard G. Salmon.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2005.
520 $a The primary purpose of this study is to assist with the determination of the legality of the policy adopted by the Commonwealth of Virginia of deducting certain federal revenues from the Basic Aid finance formula for public education. First, this study involves a detailed review of the case law pertaining to the non-supplant issue with targeted federal funds. Second, a brief description of the funding models of the time utilized by the states involved in such litigation are provided in order to determine similarities and differences to various state funding systems, including the venerable foundation model utilized by Virginia.
520 $a The study provides a historical analysis of the legislation involved in the federal support of public education and the introduction of the non-supplant issue into the language of the federal legislation. Historical documents including Constitutional acts and amendments, statutes, and publications of early education scholars are reviewed.
520 $a In order to understand the subtlety of the non-supplant issue, the structures of the state systems of school finance that have had the issue of non-supplant litigated are described in some detail. The review of law includes cases retrieved from both Westlaw and Lexis Nexis databases and those cases cross-referenced with landmark decisions.
520 $a It would appear that the policy of deducting certain federal revenues from the Basic Aid entitlements due Virginia localities certainly raises the question of whether the Commonwealth has violated the language of the federal grants. The research in this document will provide comparisons between the case law and the non-supplant issue confronting the Commonwealth. Insight into the legal ramifications of the non-supplant issue and the potential implications that deducting federal revenues from the Basic Aid formula may present will be provided.
520 $a The consequences for failure to adhere to federal policy regarding the state funding of public education are portrayed in the case law decisions. Further, this research will provide an opinion as to whether the current policy of deducting federal revenues from the Basic Aid formula utilized in Virginia will withstand a legal challenge under the non-supplant language imbedded in federal education grants-in-aid.
590 $a School code: 0247.
650 4 $a Education, Finance. $3 1020300
650 4 $a Education, Administration. $3 626645
650 4 $a Political Science, Public Administration. $3 1017438
690 $a 0277
690 $a 0514
690 $a 0617
710 2 0 $a Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. $3 1017496
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-02A.
790 1 0 $a Salmon, Richard G., $e advisor
790 $a 0247
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3164098