東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Explaining decisions and gauging imp...

Duncan, Tommy LeRoy.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Explaining decisions and gauging impacts: Faculty and administrator perspectives on the alternative delivery of theological education at three Protestant seminaries (Missouri, California).

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Explaining decisions and gauging impacts: Faculty and administrator perspectives on the alternative delivery of theological education at three Protestant seminaries (Missouri, California)./
作者:	Duncan, Tommy LeRoy.
面頁冊數:	358 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: A, page: 2124.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-06A.
標題:	Education, Higher. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3177529
ISBN:	0542174820

Explaining decisions and gauging impacts: Faculty and administrator perspectives on the alternative delivery of theological education at three Protestant seminaries (Missouri, California).
Duncan, Tommy LeRoy.

Explaining decisions and gauging impacts: Faculty and administrator perspectives on the alternative delivery of theological education at three Protestant seminaries (Missouri, California). - 358 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: A, page: 2124.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2005.

This exploratory study uses a qualitative, case study approach to investigate the perspectives of faculty and administrators at three Protestant seminaries about why their institutions decided to embark on programs for the alternative delivery of theological education. Alternative delivery includes all forms of instruction other than to students in a typical classroom on the home campus. The study also explored perspectives on the impacts of alternative delivery programs on the organizational culture and mission of the institutions, as well as on gender patterns and spiritual formation. The author conducted 32 personal interviews with faculty members and administrators at Concordia Seminary in St. Louis; Covenant Theological Seminary in St. Louis; and Fuller Theological Seminary in Pasadena. Among the perspectives offered by faculty and administrators about why their institutions decided to pursue alternative delivery programs were: (1) to respond to pastoral shortages, the needs of churches and prospective students, and denominational leaders; (2) to fulfill the seminary's mission; (3) to promote the institution and extend its "reach;" and (4) to grow student enrollments and enhance revenue, thereby strengthening the home campus. Concerning the impacts of alternative delivery programs on the seminaries, faculty and administrators believed that such programs increased enrollment, but disagreed about the revenue effect. Many of those interviewed believed that alternative programs had impacted the organization, technology, operations, personnel, decision-making, quality, and curricula of the seminaries---both positively and negatively. In all three cases, female enrollment appears to be impacted positively by alternative programs, but perspectives differ about whether spiritual formation among students enrolled in alternative programs is comparable to that of students on the home campus---although some interviewees believed spiritual formation is stronger among extension cohorts. Major findings include awareness by faculty and administrators that: (1) alternative delivery impacts the seminary both positively and negatively in numerous, unintended ways; (2) transfer of learning can occur from alternative programs back to the home campus, impacting traditional programs positively; (3) alternative programs can increase female enrollment; and (4) such programs can improve relationships with a seminary's various constituencies and extend the seminary's "reach."

ISBN: 0542174820Subjects--Topical Terms:

543175
Education, Higher.

Explaining decisions and gauging impacts: Faculty and administrator perspectives on the alternative delivery of theological education at three Protestant seminaries (Missouri, California).
LDR:03524nmm 2200289 4500 001 1816763
005 20060714114154.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 0542174820
035 $a (UnM)AAI3177529
035 $a AAI3177529
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Duncan, Tommy LeRoy. $3 1906137
245 1 0 $a Explaining decisions and gauging impacts: Faculty and administrator perspectives on the alternative delivery of theological education at three Protestant seminaries (Missouri, California).
300 $a 358 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: A, page: 2124.
500 $a Director: Dudley B. Woodard.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2005.
520 $a This exploratory study uses a qualitative, case study approach to investigate the perspectives of faculty and administrators at three Protestant seminaries about why their institutions decided to embark on programs for the alternative delivery of theological education. Alternative delivery includes all forms of instruction other than to students in a typical classroom on the home campus. The study also explored perspectives on the impacts of alternative delivery programs on the organizational culture and mission of the institutions, as well as on gender patterns and spiritual formation. The author conducted 32 personal interviews with faculty members and administrators at Concordia Seminary in St. Louis; Covenant Theological Seminary in St. Louis; and Fuller Theological Seminary in Pasadena. Among the perspectives offered by faculty and administrators about why their institutions decided to pursue alternative delivery programs were: (1) to respond to pastoral shortages, the needs of churches and prospective students, and denominational leaders; (2) to fulfill the seminary's mission; (3) to promote the institution and extend its "reach;" and (4) to grow student enrollments and enhance revenue, thereby strengthening the home campus. Concerning the impacts of alternative delivery programs on the seminaries, faculty and administrators believed that such programs increased enrollment, but disagreed about the revenue effect. Many of those interviewed believed that alternative programs had impacted the organization, technology, operations, personnel, decision-making, quality, and curricula of the seminaries---both positively and negatively. In all three cases, female enrollment appears to be impacted positively by alternative programs, but perspectives differ about whether spiritual formation among students enrolled in alternative programs is comparable to that of students on the home campus---although some interviewees believed spiritual formation is stronger among extension cohorts. Major findings include awareness by faculty and administrators that: (1) alternative delivery impacts the seminary both positively and negatively in numerous, unintended ways; (2) transfer of learning can occur from alternative programs back to the home campus, impacting traditional programs positively; (3) alternative programs can increase female enrollment; and (4) such programs can improve relationships with a seminary's various constituencies and extend the seminary's "reach."
590 $a School code: 0009.
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
650 4 $a Education, Religious. $3 1017705
650 4 $a Religion, Clergy. $3 1017702
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0527
690 $a 0319
710 2 0 $a The University of Arizona. $3 1017508
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-06A.
790 1 0 $a Woodard, Dudley B., $e advisor
790 $a 0009
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3177529