東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Imagination, physiology, and the dyn...

Balladur, Laura Cecilia.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Imagination, physiology, and the dynamics of representation in Enlightenment France (Rene Descartes, Denis Diderot, Nicolas Malebranche, Julien Offray de La Mettrie, Charles Bonnet).

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Imagination, physiology, and the dynamics of representation in Enlightenment France (Rene Descartes, Denis Diderot, Nicolas Malebranche, Julien Offray de La Mettrie, Charles Bonnet)./
作者:	Balladur, Laura Cecilia.
面頁冊數:	310 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-10, Section: A, page: 3666.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-10A.
標題:	Literature, Romance. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3191940
ISBN:	0542363909

Imagination, physiology, and the dynamics of representation in Enlightenment France (Rene Descartes, Denis Diderot, Nicolas Malebranche, Julien Offray de La Mettrie, Charles Bonnet).
Balladur, Laura Cecilia.

Imagination, physiology, and the dynamics of representation in Enlightenment France (Rene Descartes, Denis Diderot, Nicolas Malebranche, Julien Offray de La Mettrie, Charles Bonnet). - 310 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-10, Section: A, page: 3666.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Duke University, 2005.

Imagination today evokes an elusive and transcendent quality. But in Enlightenment debates on the mind-body duality, imagination was a physiological mechanism that bridged the body to the mind. Like all other bodies, therefore, it derived its laws from classical mechanics. As a mechanism thought to bridge forms and ideas, it was the only internal sense believed to be active during dreams. This physiological principle, evident in numerous treatises of the period, guides my organization: framing my analysis with three dreams of Rene Descartes and Denis Diderot's Le Reve de D'Alembert (c. 1769), I study imagination in works by Nicolas Malebranche, Julien Offray de la Mettrie, and Charles Bonnet, authors who greatly shaped the Enlightenment's scientific and intellectual history. I argue that the emergence of a proto-biological model conceptualizes imagination. From an internal sense that was thought to be situated inside the folds of the brain, imagination becomes an abstract and dynamic aspect of representation. But for eighteenth-century thinkers, the emergence of a biological model was not specific to reproduction: understood more broadly as an inherent motive force that powers matter to transform itself, a proto-biological model emerges in the physical sciences as well in the form of dynamics. This field brings into clearer focus the transformative and conceptual nature of imagination's mechanism, understood by the late eighteenth century to express the dynamic (and self-differentiating) nature of modern representation. A short conclusion contrasts Descartes's metaphor of the mind with contemporary visual culture: fountains and cinema perform, in a hidden space, the dominant ideology of the gaze.

ISBN: 0542363909Subjects--Topical Terms:

1019014
Literature, Romance.

Imagination, physiology, and the dynamics of representation in Enlightenment France (Rene Descartes, Denis Diderot, Nicolas Malebranche, Julien Offray de La Mettrie, Charles Bonnet).
LDR:02688nmm 2200265 4500 001 1816568
005 20060717100404.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 0542363909
035 $a (UnM)AAI3191940
035 $a AAI3191940
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Balladur, Laura Cecilia. $3 1905944
245 1 0 $a Imagination, physiology, and the dynamics of representation in Enlightenment France (Rene Descartes, Denis Diderot, Nicolas Malebranche, Julien Offray de La Mettrie, Charles Bonnet).
300 $a 310 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-10, Section: A, page: 3666.
500 $a Supervisor: David F. Bell.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Duke University, 2005.
520 $a Imagination today evokes an elusive and transcendent quality. But in Enlightenment debates on the mind-body duality, imagination was a physiological mechanism that bridged the body to the mind. Like all other bodies, therefore, it derived its laws from classical mechanics. As a mechanism thought to bridge forms and ideas, it was the only internal sense believed to be active during dreams. This physiological principle, evident in numerous treatises of the period, guides my organization: framing my analysis with three dreams of Rene Descartes and Denis Diderot's Le Reve de D'Alembert (c. 1769), I study imagination in works by Nicolas Malebranche, Julien Offray de la Mettrie, and Charles Bonnet, authors who greatly shaped the Enlightenment's scientific and intellectual history. I argue that the emergence of a proto-biological model conceptualizes imagination. From an internal sense that was thought to be situated inside the folds of the brain, imagination becomes an abstract and dynamic aspect of representation. But for eighteenth-century thinkers, the emergence of a biological model was not specific to reproduction: understood more broadly as an inherent motive force that powers matter to transform itself, a proto-biological model emerges in the physical sciences as well in the form of dynamics. This field brings into clearer focus the transformative and conceptual nature of imagination's mechanism, understood by the late eighteenth century to express the dynamic (and self-differentiating) nature of modern representation. A short conclusion contrasts Descartes's metaphor of the mind with contemporary visual culture: fountains and cinema perform, in a hidden space, the dominant ideology of the gaze.
590 $a School code: 0066.
650 4 $a Literature, Romance. $3 1019014
690 $a 0313
710 2 0 $a Duke University. $3 569686
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-10A.
790 1 0 $a Bell, David F., $e advisor
790 $a 0066
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3191940