東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Essays on liquidity risk and asset p...

Chen, Ning.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Essays on liquidity risk and asset pricing.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Essays on liquidity risk and asset pricing./
作者:	Chen, Ning.
面頁冊數:	121 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-08, Section: A, page: 3032.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-08A.
標題:	Economics, Finance. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3187002
ISBN:	0542292130

Essays on liquidity risk and asset pricing.
Chen, Ning.

Essays on liquidity risk and asset pricing. - 121 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-08, Section: A, page: 3032.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2005.

This work investigates the liquidity risk in financial markets, its asset pricing implications and related issues. Chapter one studies the market price of liquidity risk in the U.S. Treasury markets from a macroeconomic perspective, using on-the-run and off-the-run Treasury bonds as liquid and less liquid securities respectively. I jointly model the liquid and less liquid term structures in an affine framework with both latent and observable macro factors to investigate how the liquidity risk is priced. I find that macro variables such as inflation, real activity, and credit risk conditions have significant explanatory and forecasting power for the liquidity premium. The market price of risk and the conditional liquidity premium incorporated into the expected return of off the-run bonds vary significantly over time. Finally, the liquidity premium contains information about the future macroeconomy and can significantly improve the out-of-sample forecasting performance for macroeconomic variables. Chapter two asks the question whether a larger supply of a financial asset can lead to a higher price. The answer is yes because of the liquidity effect, meaning that the larger supply makes it easier to locate counterparties to trade and hence leads to a higher price by reducing illiquidity costs. The liquidity effect works in the opposite direction of the traditional scarcity effect, and this tradeoff leads naturally to the optimal supply decision of the security designer. These insights are illustrated in a simple search-based model. I also provide supporting empirical evidence for the effect of supply on asset prices using bond market data. I find that the effect of the amount outstanding on bond prices varies significantly over time and can be positive or negative, reflecting the changing of the relative strength between the scarcity and liquidity effects. On average, the scarcity effect dominates the liquidity effect in the U.S. Treasury market, and the opposite is true in the investment-grade corporate bond market. Furthermore, the supply effects on bond prices are correlated with other liquidity measures of bond markets like the 30-year benchmark premium. Chapter three documents an average return of 30 basis points per month on a 1-month/1-month momentum strategy that buys the best performing Treasury securities and sells the worst performing ones. The positive momentum return disappears for strategies using longer than one-month formation and holding periods. Most of the momentum returns are from the Treasury notes and bonds sectors, and are robust to most sub-periods. Surprisingly, I find that the commonly used risk factors and bond characteristics cannot explain the momentum profit. With no risk-based or behavior-based explanations available, the momentum profit is a puzzling phenomenon that needs further research.

ISBN: 0542292130Subjects--Topical Terms:

626650
Economics, Finance.

Essays on liquidity risk and asset pricing.
LDR:03707nmm 2200265 4500 001 1815721
005 20060710080815.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 0542292130
035 $a (UnM)AAI3187002
035 $a AAI3187002
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Chen, Ning. $3 1035601
245 1 0 $a Essays on liquidity risk and asset pricing.
300 $a 121 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-08, Section: A, page: 3032.
500 $a Chair: Gregory Duffee.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2005.
520 $a This work investigates the liquidity risk in financial markets, its asset pricing implications and related issues. Chapter one studies the market price of liquidity risk in the U.S. Treasury markets from a macroeconomic perspective, using on-the-run and off-the-run Treasury bonds as liquid and less liquid securities respectively. I jointly model the liquid and less liquid term structures in an affine framework with both latent and observable macro factors to investigate how the liquidity risk is priced. I find that macro variables such as inflation, real activity, and credit risk conditions have significant explanatory and forecasting power for the liquidity premium. The market price of risk and the conditional liquidity premium incorporated into the expected return of off the-run bonds vary significantly over time. Finally, the liquidity premium contains information about the future macroeconomy and can significantly improve the out-of-sample forecasting performance for macroeconomic variables. Chapter two asks the question whether a larger supply of a financial asset can lead to a higher price. The answer is yes because of the liquidity effect, meaning that the larger supply makes it easier to locate counterparties to trade and hence leads to a higher price by reducing illiquidity costs. The liquidity effect works in the opposite direction of the traditional scarcity effect, and this tradeoff leads naturally to the optimal supply decision of the security designer. These insights are illustrated in a simple search-based model. I also provide supporting empirical evidence for the effect of supply on asset prices using bond market data. I find that the effect of the amount outstanding on bond prices varies significantly over time and can be positive or negative, reflecting the changing of the relative strength between the scarcity and liquidity effects. On average, the scarcity effect dominates the liquidity effect in the U.S. Treasury market, and the opposite is true in the investment-grade corporate bond market. Furthermore, the supply effects on bond prices are correlated with other liquidity measures of bond markets like the 30-year benchmark premium. Chapter three documents an average return of 30 basis points per month on a 1-month/1-month momentum strategy that buys the best performing Treasury securities and sells the worst performing ones. The positive momentum return disappears for strategies using longer than one-month formation and holding periods. Most of the momentum returns are from the Treasury notes and bonds sectors, and are robust to most sub-periods. Surprisingly, I find that the commonly used risk factors and bond characteristics cannot explain the momentum profit. With no risk-based or behavior-based explanations available, the momentum profit is a puzzling phenomenon that needs further research.
590 $a School code: 0028.
650 4 $a Economics, Finance. $3 626650
690 $a 0508
710 2 0 $a University of California, Berkeley. $3 687832
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-08A.
790 1 0 $a Duffee, Gregory, $e advisor
790 $a 0028
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3187002