東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The effect of task type on the relat...

Moritz, Sandra Elaine.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The effect of task type on the relationship between efficacy beliefs and performance.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The effect of task type on the relationship between efficacy beliefs and performance./
作者:	Moritz, Sandra Elaine.
面頁冊數:	137 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 59-07, Section: B, page: 3774.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International59-07B.
標題:	Psychology, Social. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9839679
ISBN:	0591933853

The effect of task type on the relationship between efficacy beliefs and performance.
Moritz, Sandra Elaine.

The effect of task type on the relationship between efficacy beliefs and performance. - 137 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 59-07, Section: B, page: 3774.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 1998.

In sport, efficacy beliefs are regarded as one of the more important factors affecting an individual's motivation and performance. The purpose of this dissertation was to examine the relationships among self-efficacy, collective efficacy, and individual and team performance in a less interdependent (additive) versus a more interdependent bowling task. A second purpose of the dissertation was to determine if the relationships between efficacy and performance differed according to the level of analysis (i.e., individual vs team). The participants comprised 250 students who were enrolled in bowling classes. They were randomly assigned to two person teams. As expected, task type moderated the relationship between collective efficacy and performance, whereby collective efficacy was a significant predictor of performance in the interdependent condition but not for the additive condition. This finding, however, was dependent on the efficacy and performance measures used, and was only evident for the first time period. The results were the same for both levels of analysis. Task type did not moderate the relationship between self-efficacy and performance at either level of analysis.

ISBN: 0591933853Subjects--Topical Terms:

529430
Psychology, Social.

The effect of task type on the relationship between efficacy beliefs and performance.
LDR:02106nmm 2200289 4500 001 1813613
005 20060503132214.5
008 130610s1998 eng d
020 $a 0591933853
035 $a (UnM)AAI9839679
035 $a AAI9839679
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Moritz, Sandra Elaine. $3 1903110
245 1 4 $a The effect of task type on the relationship between efficacy beliefs and performance.
300 $a 137 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 59-07, Section: B, page: 3774.
500 $a Adviser: Deborah Feltz.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 1998.
520 $a In sport, efficacy beliefs are regarded as one of the more important factors affecting an individual's motivation and performance. The purpose of this dissertation was to examine the relationships among self-efficacy, collective efficacy, and individual and team performance in a less interdependent (additive) versus a more interdependent bowling task. A second purpose of the dissertation was to determine if the relationships between efficacy and performance differed according to the level of analysis (i.e., individual vs team). The participants comprised 250 students who were enrolled in bowling classes. They were randomly assigned to two person teams. As expected, task type moderated the relationship between collective efficacy and performance, whereby collective efficacy was a significant predictor of performance in the interdependent condition but not for the additive condition. This finding, however, was dependent on the efficacy and performance measures used, and was only evident for the first time period. The results were the same for both levels of analysis. Task type did not moderate the relationship between self-efficacy and performance at either level of analysis.
590 $a School code: 0128.
650 4 $a Psychology, Social. $3 529430
650 4 $a Psychology, Personality. $3 1017585
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Recreation. $3 1018003
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0625
690 $a 0575
710 2 0 $a Michigan State University. $3 676168
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 59-07B.
790 1 0 $a Feltz, Deborah, $e advisor
790 $a 0128
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1998
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9839679