東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Comparison of the pretest/posttest v...

Wakenight, Trent Wilson.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Comparison of the pretest/posttest vs post/then survey tool in the context of consumer food safety education.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Comparison of the pretest/posttest vs post/then survey tool in the context of consumer food safety education./
Author:	Wakenight, Trent Wilson.
Description:	58 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 42-06, page: 1925.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International42-06.
Subject:	Speech Communication. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1420015
ISBN:	0496247670

Comparison of the pretest/posttest vs post/then survey tool in the context of consumer food safety education.
Wakenight, Trent Wilson.

Comparison of the pretest/posttest vs post/then survey tool in the context of consumer food safety education. - 58 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 42-06, page: 1925.

Thesis (M.A.)--Michigan State University, 2004.

Faced with decreasing budgets, food safety educators must develop effective evaluation strategies in order to accurately prove intervention impacts to funding providers. While many educators use the pretest/posttest self-report tool to record consumers' knowledge changes, results can be skewed as consumers have a misperception of their knowledge levels in the pretest stage, over- or underestimating their knowledge. Subject to an altered frame of reference, or "response shift bias," after the intervention, consumers' knowledge is thus reflected inaccurately in the posttest. This can lead to conservative survey scores and inaccurate intervention impact(s).

ISBN: 0496247670Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017408
Speech Communication.

Comparison of the pretest/posttest vs post/then survey tool in the context of consumer food safety education.
LDR:02494nmm 2200325 4500 001 1812647
005 20060420072157.5
008 130610s2004 eng d
020 $a 0496247670
035 $a (UnM)AAI1420015
035 $a AAI1420015
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Wakenight, Trent Wilson. $3 1902191
245 1 0 $a Comparison of the pretest/posttest vs post/then survey tool in the context of consumer food safety education.
300 $a 58 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 42-06, page: 1925.
500 $a Adviser: Brenda J. Wrigley.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Michigan State University, 2004.
520 $a Faced with decreasing budgets, food safety educators must develop effective evaluation strategies in order to accurately prove intervention impacts to funding providers. While many educators use the pretest/posttest self-report tool to record consumers' knowledge changes, results can be skewed as consumers have a misperception of their knowledge levels in the pretest stage, over- or underestimating their knowledge. Subject to an altered frame of reference, or "response shift bias," after the intervention, consumers' knowledge is thus reflected inaccurately in the posttest. This can lead to conservative survey scores and inaccurate intervention impact(s).
520 $a An alternative, the post/then tool, retrospectively measures participants' resulting knowledge change asking the pretest and posttest questions after the intervention. This reduces response-shift bias and more accurately measures impact(s).
520 $a This study compared pretest/posttest and post/then mean scores within the context of food safety education for seniors. A pretest/post/then survey was also given to further estimate the accuracy of results. While the latter approach failed due to an inadequate number of participants, the post/then approach gave a more accurate portrayal of impacts and less conservative scores in eight of eight dimensions versus the discovery of meaningful scores in just five of eight dimensions in the pretest/posttest tool. These results can be used to provide justification for program existence and the maintenance of funding.
590 $a School code: 0128.
650 4 $a Speech Communication. $3 1017408
650 4 $a Business Administration, Marketing. $3 1017573
650 4 $a Education, Health. $3 1017668
650 4 $a Education, Tests and Measurements. $3 1017589
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0338
690 $a 0680
690 $a 0288
710 2 0 $a Michigan State University. $3 676168
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 42-06.
790 1 0 $a Wrigley, Brenda J., $e advisor
790 $a 0128
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2004
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1420015