東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A theoretical framework for examinin...

Owen, Lorne James.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A theoretical framework for examining multi-stakeholder (group) conflicts over agriculture resource use and farming practices.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A theoretical framework for examining multi-stakeholder (group) conflicts over agriculture resource use and farming practices./
作者:	Owen, Lorne James.
面頁冊數:	188 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-04, Section: A, page: 1229.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-04A.
標題:	Education, Agricultural. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NQ67234
ISBN:	0612672344

A theoretical framework for examining multi-stakeholder (group) conflicts over agriculture resource use and farming practices.
Owen, Lorne James.

A theoretical framework for examining multi-stakeholder (group) conflicts over agriculture resource use and farming practices. - 188 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-04, Section: A, page: 1229.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Guelph (Canada), 2002.

An increasing number of articles in professional and scientific journals, as well as in the public press, provide evidence of the rising number of conflicts that exist in rural communities. These conflicts arise from changes in farming practices, the increasing number of large-scale production units, resource use, and demographics. The conflicts are complex, protracted, evidence escalation and polarization, involve multi-stakeholders and encompass a wide range of social, economic and environmental issues. It is imperative that fair, effective and efficient approaches for resolving these conflicts be found: approaches that will help prevent public cynicism and costly litigation and result in better public policy choices and stronger rural communities.

ISBN: 0612672344Subjects--Topical Terms:

1022852
Education, Agricultural.

A theoretical framework for examining multi-stakeholder (group) conflicts over agriculture resource use and farming practices.
LDR:03520nmm 2200325 4500 001 1810713
005 20040329092831.5
008 130610s2002 eng d
020 $a 0612672344
035 $a (UnM)AAINQ67234
035 $a AAINQ67234
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Owen, Lorne James. $3 1900312
245 1 0 $a A theoretical framework for examining multi-stakeholder (group) conflicts over agriculture resource use and farming practices.
300 $a 188 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-04, Section: A, page: 1229.
500 $a Adviser: Mark Waldron.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Guelph (Canada), 2002.
520 $a An increasing number of articles in professional and scientific journals, as well as in the public press, provide evidence of the rising number of conflicts that exist in rural communities. These conflicts arise from changes in farming practices, the increasing number of large-scale production units, resource use, and demographics. The conflicts are complex, protracted, evidence escalation and polarization, involve multi-stakeholders and encompass a wide range of social, economic and environmental issues. It is imperative that fair, effective and efficient approaches for resolving these conflicts be found: approaches that will help prevent public cynicism and costly litigation and result in better public policy choices and stronger rural communities.
520 $a To that end, this research began with an extensive review and analysis of the literature on conflict resolution, and resulted in the development of: the problem statement, a conceptual framework for analyzing conflicts using a multiple case study approach, and a provisional theoretical model. This model was tested and a final empirical model was developed using an explanatory case study approach. Prior to the selection and study of five complex, multiple stakeholder, high profile conflicts over agricultural resource use and farming practices, a pilot case study was conducted to refine data collection.
520 $a The conclusions of this research are as follows. Conflicts over resource use cannot be addressed directly through settlement or integrative approaches alone. An inclusive interactive approach, with respect to both participants and topics, that contributes to participants' recognition, empowerment, and shared learning, increases social capital and paves the way for stable, positive outcomes or integrative solutions. Initial extensive, informal outreach in which the emphasis is on sharing information, communication, positive interactions and building relationships, is key to realizing an integrative resolution. Also key, are intermediaries who build trust, legitimacy, and personal relationships through interpersonal skills, who use a democratic and affiliative leadership for problem solving and decision making, and who provide physical, transactional and epistemic safety through the use of strong facilitation skills.
520 $a In summary, this research finds that having the right person, doing the right things, the right way, is essential to increase the likelihood of resolving conflicts over agriculture resource use and fanning practice.
590 $a School code: 0081.
650 4 $a Education, Agricultural. $3 1022852
650 4 $a Urban and Regional Planning. $3 1017841
650 4 $a Economics, Agricultural. $3 626648
690 $a 0517
690 $a 0999
690 $a 0503
710 2 0 $a University of Guelph (Canada). $3 1018650
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 63-04A.
790 1 0 $a Waldron, Mark, $e advisor
790 $a 0081
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2002
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NQ67234