東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Co-Management: The Legal Impact of P...

Graben, Sari M.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Co-Management: The Legal Impact of Participatory Governance on Administrative Decision-Making in the Mackenzie Valley.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Co-Management: The Legal Impact of Participatory Governance on Administrative Decision-Making in the Mackenzie Valley./
作者:	Graben, Sari M.
面頁冊數:	273 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-05, Section: A, page: .
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International72-05A.
標題:	Law. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NR71344
ISBN:	9780494713440

Co-Management: The Legal Impact of Participatory Governance on Administrative Decision-Making in the Mackenzie Valley.
Graben, Sari M.

Co-Management: The Legal Impact of Participatory Governance on Administrative Decision-Making in the Mackenzie Valley. - 273 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-05, Section: A, page: .

Thesis (Ph.D.)--York University (Canada), 2010.

This dissertation offers a legal perspective on the dynamics of Indigenous participation in administrative institutions, with a specific focus on co-management boards. Co-management is a participatory governance arrangement used for resource management in Canada. In the Mackenzie Valley, some of the land claims are settled, jurisdiction is established, and the authority to determine the development of settled lands rest with Indigenous governments. What remains uncertain are the perspectives of Indigenous peoples on the risks and benefits of development and how much control they have over its terms. Co-management is expected to address these uncertainties. However, there are questions as to whether participatory governance arrangements can achieve the political objectives that precipitated co-management.

ISBN: 9780494713440Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.

Co-Management: The Legal Impact of Participatory Governance on Administrative Decision-Making in the Mackenzie Valley.
LDR:03367nam 2200301 4500 001 1403019
005 20111108080352.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780494713440
035 $a (UMI)AAINR71344
035 $a AAINR71344
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Graben, Sari M. $3 1682252
245 1 0 $a Co-Management: The Legal Impact of Participatory Governance on Administrative Decision-Making in the Mackenzie Valley.
300 $a 273 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-05, Section: A, page: .
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--York University (Canada), 2010.
520 $a This dissertation offers a legal perspective on the dynamics of Indigenous participation in administrative institutions, with a specific focus on co-management boards. Co-management is a participatory governance arrangement used for resource management in Canada. In the Mackenzie Valley, some of the land claims are settled, jurisdiction is established, and the authority to determine the development of settled lands rest with Indigenous governments. What remains uncertain are the perspectives of Indigenous peoples on the risks and benefits of development and how much control they have over its terms. Co-management is expected to address these uncertainties. However, there are questions as to whether participatory governance arrangements can achieve the political objectives that precipitated co-management.
520 $a This dissertation is concerned with the relevance of the law to the increased participation of Indigenous peoples in resource management. To this end, it provides an empirical analysis of how participatory governance is constructed by statute and conceived through the administration of co-management. It provides a detailed examination of how law is used to support or detract from co-management arrangements as a participatory initiative. It also offers a legal perspective on the dynamics of participatory governance within administrative institutions.
520 $a In explaining the role of the administrative agency, this thesis concludes that it is possible for co-management boards to successfully account for Indigenous perspectives in regulation. The dissertation makes the case for this conclusion through analysis of agency discretion over statutory interpretation, rulemaking, and ministerial recommendations. This finding suggests two claims. The first is that co-management boards can promote participatory governance through the exercise of discretionary authority. The second claim is that regulation deriving from co-management may be better explained by an administrative theory that relies on participatory governance, rather than a procedural conception of participation. In addition, it suggests that where participation is foundational to the agency, greater import should be paid to its regulatory output. Thus, this thesis builds on the recognition that Aboriginal rights are not only developed and affirmed through the courts. Rights can also be developed as a product of Indigenous participation in public administration.
590 $a School code: 0267.
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Political Science, Public Administration. $3 1017438
650 4 $a Native American Studies. $3 626633
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0740
710 2 $a York University (Canada). $3 1017889
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 72-05A.
790 $a 0267
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NR71344