東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Brokering peace: Bargaining, interna...

Schmidt, Holger.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Brokering peace: Bargaining, international institutions and the management of international conflict.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Brokering peace: Bargaining, international institutions and the management of international conflict./
Author:	Schmidt, Holger.
Description:	206 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-08, Section: A, page: 3177.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International70-08A.
Subject:	Peace Studies. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3373534
ISBN:	9781109345766

Brokering peace: Bargaining, international institutions and the management of international conflict.
Schmidt, Holger.

Brokering peace: Bargaining, international institutions and the management of international conflict. - 206 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-08, Section: A, page: 3177.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2009.

This dissertation examines the role of international institutions in the management and prevention of violent conflict. The dissertation is comprised of three independent research papers, each focusing on a distinct aspect of this general topic. The first paper examines whether and to what extent international organizations (and other third-party actors) need to be impartial in order to make an effective contribution to the resolution of conflicts involving problems of credible commitment, with a focus on third-party efforts to promote peace after civil war. The second paper analyzes the role that international institutions can play in helping states signal their peaceful intentions, using Germany's European policy as a case study. The third and final paper investigates the link between regime type and states' proclivity for acting through international institutions. Focusing on the case of the United Nations, the paper uses quantitative analysis to challenge the widespread notion that democracies are more inclined to settle their conflicts with the help of international organizations than are other types of states. Collectively, the papers seek to demonstrate the utility of insights derived from rationalist bargaining theory combined with rigorous empirical analysis for improving our understanding of the role international institutions play in the management and prevention of violent conflicts.

ISBN: 9781109345766Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669515
Peace Studies.

Brokering peace: Bargaining, international institutions and the management of international conflict.
LDR:02345nam 2200289 4500 001 1402980
005 20111108080338.5
008 130515s2009 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109345766
035 $a (UMI)AAI3373534
035 $a AAI3373534
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Schmidt, Holger. $3 1682208
245 1 0 $a Brokering peace: Bargaining, international institutions and the management of international conflict.
300 $a 206 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-08, Section: A, page: 3177.
500 $a Adviser: Robert Jervis.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2009.
520 $a This dissertation examines the role of international institutions in the management and prevention of violent conflict. The dissertation is comprised of three independent research papers, each focusing on a distinct aspect of this general topic. The first paper examines whether and to what extent international organizations (and other third-party actors) need to be impartial in order to make an effective contribution to the resolution of conflicts involving problems of credible commitment, with a focus on third-party efforts to promote peace after civil war. The second paper analyzes the role that international institutions can play in helping states signal their peaceful intentions, using Germany's European policy as a case study. The third and final paper investigates the link between regime type and states' proclivity for acting through international institutions. Focusing on the case of the United Nations, the paper uses quantitative analysis to challenge the widespread notion that democracies are more inclined to settle their conflicts with the help of international organizations than are other types of states. Collectively, the papers seek to demonstrate the utility of insights derived from rationalist bargaining theory combined with rigorous empirical analysis for improving our understanding of the role international institutions play in the management and prevention of violent conflicts.
590 $a School code: 0054.
650 4 $a Peace Studies. $3 1669515
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
650 4 $a Political Science, International Law and Relations. $3 1017399
690 $a 0563
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0616
710 2 $a Columbia University. $3 571054
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 70-08A.
790 1 0 $a Jervis, Robert, $e advisor
790 $a 0054
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2009
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3373534