東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Performance management in Korean gov...

Ryu, Sun Hee.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Performance management in Korean government.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Performance management in Korean government./
作者:	Ryu, Sun Hee.
面頁冊數:	215 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-05, Section: A, page: 1792.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-05A.
標題:	Political Science, Public Administration. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3407113
ISBN:	9781109743326

Performance management in Korean government.
Ryu, Sun Hee.

Performance management in Korean government. - 215 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-05, Section: A, page: 1792.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2010.

The question of whether performance management (PM) matters to the public sector is still raised despite numerous studies on it, with mixed findings. To address the question, this study examines what factors restrain PM from mattering and whether it matters to promoting desirable organizational culture and further improving organizational effectiveness. Specifically, the study explores whether contextual factors (political environment, size of budget, and task characteristics) interfere with PM implementation outcomes, and whether PM has positive associations with boosting organizational culture consistent with NPM views (or generally known to be effective to performance improvement) and organizational effectiveness. The PM implementation focuses on quality of performance measures, use of performance information for management, acceptance of accountability for results, and recognition of benefits of PM.

ISBN: 9781109743326Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017438
Political Science, Public Administration.

Performance management in Korean government.
LDR:03492nam 2200325 4500 001 1400436
005 20111010080548.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109743326
035 $a (UMI)AAI3407113
035 $a AAI3407113
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Ryu, Sun Hee. $3 1679497
245 1 0 $a Performance management in Korean government.
300 $a 215 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-05, Section: A, page: 1792.
500 $a Adviser: N. J. Cayer.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2010.
520 $a The question of whether performance management (PM) matters to the public sector is still raised despite numerous studies on it, with mixed findings. To address the question, this study examines what factors restrain PM from mattering and whether it matters to promoting desirable organizational culture and further improving organizational effectiveness. Specifically, the study explores whether contextual factors (political environment, size of budget, and task characteristics) interfere with PM implementation outcomes, and whether PM has positive associations with boosting organizational culture consistent with NPM views (or generally known to be effective to performance improvement) and organizational effectiveness. The PM implementation focuses on quality of performance measures, use of performance information for management, acceptance of accountability for results, and recognition of benefits of PM.
520 $a Data is obtained from surveying non-management government employees sampled from four ministries of the Korean government covering diverse kinds of programs. Questionnaires are distributed to the samples and 238 usable surveys out of 553 are returned (response rate = 43.4%). Study hypotheses are tested using multiple regressions.
520 $a This study finds that political complexity (complex stakeholders and diverse influences) does not hamper PM implementation, rather tends to facilitate directly and indirectly PM by enhancing goal clarification and commitment to PM, and a larger budget has positive associations with choice of outcome measures and use of information for resource allocation. The study highlights the importance of goal clarity, organizational commitment to PM, incentive systems, and technical limitations of PM, for successful PM implementation outcomes to turn out.
520 $a In terms of PM effect on organizational culture and effectiveness, the study finds that authentic PM activities (developing performance measures of higher quality and actively using performance information for management) might lead to the promotion of supportive and innovative cultures and organizational effectiveness, yet weakening bureaucratic culture. However, incentive systems, a component of the entire PM system, show positive associations with bureaucratic culture and redtape, suggesting that they could be main sources of dysfunctional effects (reinforcing rigid bureaucratic culture and redtape) of PM implementation, while helping to create competition among organizational components and breed their commitment to PM activities and results-oriented culture.
590 $a School code: 0010.
650 4 $a Political Science, Public Administration. $3 1017438
650 4 $a Sociology, Public and Social Welfare. $3 1017909
650 4 $a Sociology, Organizational. $3 1018023
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0703
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $3 1017445
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-05A.
790 1 0 $a Cayer, N. J., $e advisor
790 $a 0010
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3407113