東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Terror management theory: Interplay ...

Shatil, Sharon R.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Terror management theory: Interplay between mortality salience, death-thoughts, and overall worldview defense.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Terror management theory: Interplay between mortality salience, death-thoughts, and overall worldview defense./
作者:	Shatil, Sharon R.
面頁冊數:	125 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-07, Section: B, page: .
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International72-07B.
標題:	Psychology, Social. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3454288
ISBN:	9781124632858

Terror management theory: Interplay between mortality salience, death-thoughts, and overall worldview defense.
Shatil, Sharon R.

Terror management theory: Interplay between mortality salience, death-thoughts, and overall worldview defense. - 125 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-07, Section: B, page: .

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Marquette University, 2012.

This study examines both the generalizability of Terror Management Theory (TMT) and the mechanisms by which individual difference variables work in the TMT model. A plethora of research exists to support TMT, a theory that explains much of human behavior as attempts to buffer the potential for anxiety provoked by being aware of one's own inevitable mortality (Pyszczynski et al., 2003). This dissertation investigated the generalizability of Terror Management Theory (TMT) and the mechanisms by which individual difference variables work in the TMT process. In order to do so, an operationalization of the variable "overall worldview" was provided. Participants consisted of 367 college students from the Psychology Department Experimental Subject Pool of a mid-sized Midwestern university. Subjects were quasi-randomly assigned to a 2 (mortality salience vs. control) x 2 (death-thought word stems vs. neutral word stems) between subjects design. Results suggested that humanists defended humanism more in the mortality salience condition than in the dental pain condition. However, mortality salience did not increase the defense of the normative worldview for normatives. Contrary to expectations, humanists and normatives defended their respective worldviews to an equivalent extent in the mortality salience condition. Mortality salience did not lead to defense of the American worldview for normatives or for humanists. Participants in the mortality salience condition, humanists, and normatives did not differ on the number of accessible death-thoughts in either the mortality salience or the dental pain condition. Despite methodological limitations, this study suggests that, at least for humanists, TMT does generalize beyond specific cultural worldviews to overall worldviews. It also indicates that the individual difference variables of being humanist/non-humanist and normative/non-normative do not affect the ability of mortality salience to prime death-thoughts. Rather, being humanist or non-humanist affects worldview defense after the death-thoughts have been primed and before distal defenses (i.e., worldview defense) are activated.

ISBN: 9781124632858Subjects--Topical Terms:

529430
Psychology, Social.

Terror management theory: Interplay between mortality salience, death-thoughts, and overall worldview defense.
LDR:03260nam 2200325 4500 001 1399038
005 20110919095927.5
008 130515s2012 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124632858
035 $a (UMI)AAI3454288
035 $a AAI3454288
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Shatil, Sharon R. $3 1677972
245 1 0 $a Terror management theory: Interplay between mortality salience, death-thoughts, and overall worldview defense.
300 $a 125 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-07, Section: B, page: .
500 $a Advisers: Matthew Sanders; Ed de St. Aubin.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Marquette University, 2012.
520 $a This study examines both the generalizability of Terror Management Theory (TMT) and the mechanisms by which individual difference variables work in the TMT model. A plethora of research exists to support TMT, a theory that explains much of human behavior as attempts to buffer the potential for anxiety provoked by being aware of one's own inevitable mortality (Pyszczynski et al., 2003). This dissertation investigated the generalizability of Terror Management Theory (TMT) and the mechanisms by which individual difference variables work in the TMT process. In order to do so, an operationalization of the variable "overall worldview" was provided. Participants consisted of 367 college students from the Psychology Department Experimental Subject Pool of a mid-sized Midwestern university. Subjects were quasi-randomly assigned to a 2 (mortality salience vs. control) x 2 (death-thought word stems vs. neutral word stems) between subjects design. Results suggested that humanists defended humanism more in the mortality salience condition than in the dental pain condition. However, mortality salience did not increase the defense of the normative worldview for normatives. Contrary to expectations, humanists and normatives defended their respective worldviews to an equivalent extent in the mortality salience condition. Mortality salience did not lead to defense of the American worldview for normatives or for humanists. Participants in the mortality salience condition, humanists, and normatives did not differ on the number of accessible death-thoughts in either the mortality salience or the dental pain condition. Despite methodological limitations, this study suggests that, at least for humanists, TMT does generalize beyond specific cultural worldviews to overall worldviews. It also indicates that the individual difference variables of being humanist/non-humanist and normative/non-normative do not affect the ability of mortality salience to prime death-thoughts. Rather, being humanist or non-humanist affects worldview defense after the death-thoughts have been primed and before distal defenses (i.e., worldview defense) are activated.
590 $a School code: 0116.
650 4 $a Psychology, Social. $3 529430
650 4 $a Psychology, Clinical. $3 524864
650 4 $a Psychology, Personality. $3 1017585
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0625
710 2 $a Marquette University. $b Clinical Psychology. $3 1677973
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 72-07B.
790 1 0 $a Sanders, Matthew, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a de St. Aubin, Ed, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Saunders, Stephen $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Franzoi, Stephen $e committee member
790 $a 0116
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2012
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3454288