東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The rhetoric of physics: An ethnogra...

Graves, Heather Ann Brodie.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The rhetoric of physics: An ethnography of the research and writing processes in a physics laboratory.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The rhetoric of physics: An ethnography of the research and writing processes in a physics laboratory./
作者:	Graves, Heather Ann Brodie.
面頁冊數:	277 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 53-11, Section: A, page: 3885.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International53-11A.
標題:	Speech Communication. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9307763

The rhetoric of physics: An ethnography of the research and writing processes in a physics laboratory.
Graves, Heather Ann Brodie.

The rhetoric of physics: An ethnography of the research and writing processes in a physics laboratory. - 277 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 53-11, Section: A, page: 3885.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Ohio State University, 1992.

This dissertation explores the extent to which rhetoric plays a role in the research and writing processes of physicists. It seeks to join the on-going conversation in the rhetoric of inquiry about the ways in which rhetorical forces shape all knowledge systems. Based on data collected during a six-month ethnography in a thin films laboratory, this study argues that these physicists use rhetoric in all stages of the knowledge creation process. After following the experimental process through all its stages from the inception of an experiment through to publication, this study maps out the types of heuristic devices employed by the physicists as they analyzed, interpreted, and presented their research data in a persuasive scientific article. In light of the insights gained from studying the dynamic interactions between physicists, this dissertation also comments on the theoretical and philosophical debates under discussion in the rhetoric of inquiry and the rhetoric of science. It examines current theories of language (as expressed by rhetoricians, critical theorists, and the physicists in this laboratory) to explore the relationship between reality and language, the role that rhetoric plays in knowledge creation in physics, and the ways in which reality and knowledge may be socially constructed. It concludes that these physicists use rhetorical invention strategies to interpret and present their data. It also argues that scientific knowledge is subject to rhetorical forces because it deals with contingent affairs--phenomena about which scientists advance propositions which appear to be true but about which there is no way to gain absolute certainty or truth. Finally, it concludes that rhetoric both is and is not epistemic in the physics research studied here, and it argues that instead of asking "Is rhetoric epistemic?" perhaps we might shift our attention to inquiring "When is rhetoric epistemic?"Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017408
Speech Communication.

The rhetoric of physics: An ethnography of the research and writing processes in a physics laboratory.
LDR:02845nam 2200277 4500 001 1398289
005 20110908142947.5
008 130515s1992 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
035 $a (UMI)AAI9307763
035 $a AAI9307763
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Graves, Heather Ann Brodie. $3 1677169
245 1 4 $a The rhetoric of physics: An ethnography of the research and writing processes in a physics laboratory.
300 $a 277 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 53-11, Section: A, page: 3885.
500 $a Adviser: Andrea A. Lunsford.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Ohio State University, 1992.
520 $a This dissertation explores the extent to which rhetoric plays a role in the research and writing processes of physicists. It seeks to join the on-going conversation in the rhetoric of inquiry about the ways in which rhetorical forces shape all knowledge systems. Based on data collected during a six-month ethnography in a thin films laboratory, this study argues that these physicists use rhetoric in all stages of the knowledge creation process. After following the experimental process through all its stages from the inception of an experiment through to publication, this study maps out the types of heuristic devices employed by the physicists as they analyzed, interpreted, and presented their research data in a persuasive scientific article. In light of the insights gained from studying the dynamic interactions between physicists, this dissertation also comments on the theoretical and philosophical debates under discussion in the rhetoric of inquiry and the rhetoric of science. It examines current theories of language (as expressed by rhetoricians, critical theorists, and the physicists in this laboratory) to explore the relationship between reality and language, the role that rhetoric plays in knowledge creation in physics, and the ways in which reality and knowledge may be socially constructed. It concludes that these physicists use rhetorical invention strategies to interpret and present their data. It also argues that scientific knowledge is subject to rhetorical forces because it deals with contingent affairs--phenomena about which scientists advance propositions which appear to be true but about which there is no way to gain absolute certainty or truth. Finally, it concludes that rhetoric both is and is not epistemic in the physics research studied here, and it argues that instead of asking "Is rhetoric epistemic?" perhaps we might shift our attention to inquiring "When is rhetoric epistemic?"
590 $a School code: 0168.
650 4 $a Speech Communication. $3 1017408
650 4 $a Physics, General. $3 1018488
650 4 $a Language, General. $3 1018089
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0605
690 $a 0679
710 2 $a The Ohio State University. $3 718944
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 53-11A.
790 1 0 $a Lunsford, Andrea A., $e advisor
790 $a 0168
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1992
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9307763