東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The influence of majority ideology o...

Lee, Jennifer M.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The influence of majority ideology on environmental law adjudication in the U.S. Supreme Court.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The influence of majority ideology on environmental law adjudication in the U.S. Supreme Court./
作者:	Lee, Jennifer M.
面頁冊數:	41 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-05, page: 2771.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International48-05.
標題:	Law. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1475098
ISBN:	9781109719208

The influence of majority ideology on environmental law adjudication in the U.S. Supreme Court.
Lee, Jennifer M.

The influence of majority ideology on environmental law adjudication in the U.S. Supreme Court. - 41 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-05, page: 2771.

Thesis (M.P.P.)--Georgetown University, 2011.

As the highest court in the land, the U.S. Supreme Court is the final interpreter of federal law. Its interpretations can mean the difference between clean drinking water and pollution with impunity. An understanding of the factors that influence Supreme Court decision-making is therefore critical to environmental protection. While other fields of law have examined the impact of ideology on Supreme Court decision-making, its effect on environmental law adjudication remains unexplored. My investigation expanded the scope of existing lower court studies by examining how majority ideology affects the disposition of environmental cases in the Supreme Court. I hypothesized that a Supreme Court with a liberal majority was more likely than a conservative majority to rule in favor of environmental protection. Using a weighted least squares linear probability model and a probit model, I found that a liberal Court majority, a Democratic sitting President, and an anti-environmental protection lower court decision all increase the probability that the Supreme Court will issue a pro-environmental protection decision. By improving our understanding of Supreme Court decision making, my study offers insight on how to best advocate for environmental protection.

ISBN: 9781109719208Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.

The influence of majority ideology on environmental law adjudication in the U.S. Supreme Court.
LDR:02190nam 2200301 4500 001 1395488
005 20110518115304.5
008 130515s2011 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109719208
035 $a (UMI)AAI1475098
035 $a AAI1475098
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Lee, Jennifer M. $3 1674184
245 1 4 $a The influence of majority ideology on environmental law adjudication in the U.S. Supreme Court.
300 $a 41 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-05, page: 2771.
500 $a Adviser: Daniel Hilliard.
502 $a Thesis (M.P.P.)--Georgetown University, 2011.
520 $a As the highest court in the land, the U.S. Supreme Court is the final interpreter of federal law. Its interpretations can mean the difference between clean drinking water and pollution with impunity. An understanding of the factors that influence Supreme Court decision-making is therefore critical to environmental protection. While other fields of law have examined the impact of ideology on Supreme Court decision-making, its effect on environmental law adjudication remains unexplored. My investigation expanded the scope of existing lower court studies by examining how majority ideology affects the disposition of environmental cases in the Supreme Court. I hypothesized that a Supreme Court with a liberal majority was more likely than a conservative majority to rule in favor of environmental protection. Using a weighted least squares linear probability model and a probit model, I found that a liberal Court majority, a Democratic sitting President, and an anti-environmental protection lower court decision all increase the probability that the Supreme Court will issue a pro-environmental protection decision. By improving our understanding of Supreme Court decision making, my study offers insight on how to best advocate for environmental protection.
590 $a School code: 0076.
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Environmental Law. $3 676816
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
650 4 $a Sociology, Public and Social Welfare. $3 1017909
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0439
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0630
710 2 $a Georgetown University. $b Public Policy & Policy Management. $3 1019387
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 48-05.
790 1 0 $a Hilliard, Daniel, $e advisor
790 $a 0076
791 $a M.P.P.
792 $a 2011
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1475098