東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Community-graced research: The ethic...

Wynn, Winona M.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Community-graced research: The ethics of ethnographic crossings .

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Community-graced research: The ethics of ethnographic crossings ./
作者:	Wynn, Winona M.
面頁冊數:	172 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-11, Section: A, page: 4334.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International70-11A.
標題:	American Studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3382139
ISBN:	9781109461855

Community-graced research: The ethics of ethnographic crossings .
Wynn, Winona M.

Community-graced research: The ethics of ethnographic crossings . - 172 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-11, Section: A, page: 4334.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Washington State University, 2009.

The thoughts, reflections, and analyses in this work are intended to further inform those who are interested in exploring vulnerability and change, ethics and politics, and who are above all interested in the political conundrums that accompany crossing into spaces that are not our own. At the time of this writing, there was not a universal, agreed upon protocol for the inspection and critique of the "researcher persona". Although, policies are in place to protect those described and labeled as "vulnerable", (Internal Review Boards); these same policies do not demand the researchers participate in a reciprocal exposure---that of processing and making known their own histories and vulnerabilities through a public disclosure experience as intrusive and intensive as those which purport to describe the "researched". This dissertation work, in part, argues for a individualized research pre-process, one that includes a "reciprocal storytelling", a dialogical process through which the researcher and the researched recognize and acknowledge the "elephant in the room"----the clash of motive, intent, bias, authority, respect, disclosure and cultural representation. This, I argue, is only possible if we examine the privilege and power structures inextricably linked to the institutional research process and humbly bestow that same privilege and power upon community processes. In other words, dismantle structures of privilege, particularly ones that tout and promote the binary of "expert/novice". Although Participatory Action Research, or Participatory Community Research is usually driven by a combination of researcher and community need, and the agenda is agreed upon by both parties prior to an "ethnographic crossing", commonly, the researcher still directs the project and the community participants and their accompanying processes still remain the object of study. The main point of this work is to remind us that we remain accountable for all that transpires before, during, and long after we leave communities that are not our own. Research is not a linear process. On the ground, trickster tracks us---circling back to critique, complicate, and challenge our claims. In the air, condors circle---viewing the remnants of what we have left behind.

ISBN: 9781109461855Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017604
American Studies.

Community-graced research: The ethics of ethnographic crossings .
LDR:03215nam 2200313 4500 001 1391774
005 20110119103312.5
008 130515s2009 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109461855
035 $a (UMI)AAI3382139
035 $a AAI3382139
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Wynn, Winona M. $3 1670223
245 1 0 $a Community-graced research: The ethics of ethnographic crossings .
300 $a 172 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-11, Section: A, page: 4334.
500 $a Adviser: C. Richard King.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Washington State University, 2009.
520 $a The thoughts, reflections, and analyses in this work are intended to further inform those who are interested in exploring vulnerability and change, ethics and politics, and who are above all interested in the political conundrums that accompany crossing into spaces that are not our own. At the time of this writing, there was not a universal, agreed upon protocol for the inspection and critique of the "researcher persona". Although, policies are in place to protect those described and labeled as "vulnerable", (Internal Review Boards); these same policies do not demand the researchers participate in a reciprocal exposure---that of processing and making known their own histories and vulnerabilities through a public disclosure experience as intrusive and intensive as those which purport to describe the "researched". This dissertation work, in part, argues for a individualized research pre-process, one that includes a "reciprocal storytelling", a dialogical process through which the researcher and the researched recognize and acknowledge the "elephant in the room"----the clash of motive, intent, bias, authority, respect, disclosure and cultural representation. This, I argue, is only possible if we examine the privilege and power structures inextricably linked to the institutional research process and humbly bestow that same privilege and power upon community processes. In other words, dismantle structures of privilege, particularly ones that tout and promote the binary of "expert/novice". Although Participatory Action Research, or Participatory Community Research is usually driven by a combination of researcher and community need, and the agenda is agreed upon by both parties prior to an "ethnographic crossing", commonly, the researcher still directs the project and the community participants and their accompanying processes still remain the object of study. The main point of this work is to remind us that we remain accountable for all that transpires before, during, and long after we leave communities that are not our own. Research is not a linear process. On the ground, trickster tracks us---circling back to critique, complicate, and challenge our claims. In the air, condors circle---viewing the remnants of what we have left behind.
590 $a School code: 0251.
650 4 $a American Studies. $3 1017604
650 4 $a Sociology, Theory and Methods. $3 626625
650 4 $a Ethics. $3 517264
650 4 $a Sociology, Ethnic and Racial Studies. $3 1017474
650 4 $a Native American Studies. $3 626633
690 $a 0323
690 $a 0344
690 $a 0394
690 $a 0631
690 $a 0740
710 2 $a Washington State University. $3 678588
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 70-11A.
790 1 0 $a King, C. Richard, $e advisor
790 $a 0251
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2009
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3382139