東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"Social Philosophy." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The politics of metaphysics

Moreira, Felipe G. A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The politics of metaphysics

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The politics of metaphysics/ by Felipe G. A. Moreira.
作者:	Moreira, Felipe G. A.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2022.,
面頁冊數:	xvi, 257 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
內容註:	Chapter 1. Introduction -- Part 1. The Right-Wing Approach -- Chapter 2.The Properly Dogmatic "Subtle" Violence -- Chapter 3. The Pseudo-Non-Dogmatic "Subtle" Violence -- Part 2. The Left-Wing Approach -- Chapter 4. Nietzsche vs. Carnap -- Chapter 5. Friedrich Carnap: Rudolf Nietzsche -- Chapter 6. Beyond Nietzsche and Carnap,- Chapter 7. Conclusion.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Metaphysics. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12346-7
ISBN:	9783031123467

The politics of metaphysics
Moreira, Felipe G. A.

The politics of metaphysics[electronic resource] /by Felipe G. A. Moreira. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2022. - xvi, 257 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

Chapter 1. Introduction -- Part 1. The Right-Wing Approach -- Chapter 2.The Properly Dogmatic "Subtle" Violence -- Chapter 3. The Pseudo-Non-Dogmatic "Subtle" Violence -- Part 2. The Left-Wing Approach -- Chapter 4. Nietzsche vs. Carnap -- Chapter 5. Friedrich Carnap: Rudolf Nietzsche -- Chapter 6. Beyond Nietzsche and Carnap,- Chapter 7. Conclusion.

Since immemorial times, persons have been engaged in disputes in metaphysics. This book reacts to this fact by supporting five theses. Thesis 1 is that disputes are micro-wars that have a significant social importance; they involve conflicting parties who may resort to some kind of violence and depend on normative factors. Thesis 2 is that disputes can be approached from right-wing or left-wing stances. Thesis 3 is that the grounds for endorsing an approach to a dispute are problematic starting points that may be rationally rejected. Thesis 4 is that disputes have an incommensurable greatness. Thesis 5 is that right-wing approaches to disputes may be less appealing than the left-wing one championed by the book for those who endorse that one is to avoid expressing "subtle" violence. This is the violence expressed by those who suggest that others who disagree with one's criteria to deal with disputes fall short of logos or act as if such others did not exist. Dr Felipe G. A. Moreira worked as a Lecturer of Philosophy at the University of Miami in Florida, USA. He also held the posts of Substitute Professor of Philosophy at Lavras Federal University in Minas Gerais, Brazil, and of Science, Technology and Society Lecturer at Code University of Applied Sciences in Berlin, Germany.

ISBN: 9783031123467

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-12346-7doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

517082
Metaphysics.

LC Class. No.: BD111

Dewey Class. No.: 110

The politics of metaphysics
LDR:02590nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 2305286
003 DE-He213
005 20221013142236.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 230409s2022 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783031123467 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783031123450 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-12346-7 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-12346-7
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a BD111
072 7 $a HPJ $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI013000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDTJ $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 110 $2 23
090 $a BD111 $b .M838 2022
100 1 $a Moreira, Felipe G. A. $3 3608201
245 1 4 $a The politics of metaphysics $h [electronic resource] / $c by Felipe G. A. Moreira.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2022.
300 $a xvi, 257 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a Chapter 1. Introduction -- Part 1. The Right-Wing Approach -- Chapter 2.The Properly Dogmatic "Subtle" Violence -- Chapter 3. The Pseudo-Non-Dogmatic "Subtle" Violence -- Part 2. The Left-Wing Approach -- Chapter 4. Nietzsche vs. Carnap -- Chapter 5. Friedrich Carnap: Rudolf Nietzsche -- Chapter 6. Beyond Nietzsche and Carnap,- Chapter 7. Conclusion.
520 $a Since immemorial times, persons have been engaged in disputes in metaphysics. This book reacts to this fact by supporting five theses. Thesis 1 is that disputes are micro-wars that have a significant social importance; they involve conflicting parties who may resort to some kind of violence and depend on normative factors. Thesis 2 is that disputes can be approached from right-wing or left-wing stances. Thesis 3 is that the grounds for endorsing an approach to a dispute are problematic starting points that may be rationally rejected. Thesis 4 is that disputes have an incommensurable greatness. Thesis 5 is that right-wing approaches to disputes may be less appealing than the left-wing one championed by the book for those who endorse that one is to avoid expressing "subtle" violence. This is the violence expressed by those who suggest that others who disagree with one's criteria to deal with disputes fall short of logos or act as if such others did not exist. Dr Felipe G. A. Moreira worked as a Lecturer of Philosophy at the University of Miami in Florida, USA. He also held the posts of Substitute Professor of Philosophy at Lavras Federal University in Minas Gerais, Brazil, and of Science, Technology and Society Lecturer at Code University of Applied Sciences in Berlin, Germany.
650 0 $a Metaphysics. $3 517082
650 2 4 $a Philosophical Methods. $3 3593934
650 2 4 $a Social Philosophy. $3 2181952
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12346-7
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)