語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
到查詢結果
[ subject:"Science education." ]
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Writing-to-Learn in High-School Chem...
~
Nurnberg, Denae.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Writing-to-Learn in High-School Chemistry: The Effects of Using the Science Writing Heuristic to Increase Scientific Literacy.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Writing-to-Learn in High-School Chemistry: The Effects of Using the Science Writing Heuristic to Increase Scientific Literacy./
作者:
Nurnberg, Denae.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:
167 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International79-01A(E).
標題:
Science education. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10608491
ISBN:
9780355153699
Writing-to-Learn in High-School Chemistry: The Effects of Using the Science Writing Heuristic to Increase Scientific Literacy.
Nurnberg, Denae.
Writing-to-Learn in High-School Chemistry: The Effects of Using the Science Writing Heuristic to Increase Scientific Literacy.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 167 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.
Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of San Francisco, 2017.
Writing-to-Learn in High-School Chemistry: The Effects of Using the Science Writing Heuristic to Increase Scientific Literacy The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of using the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) as an instructional tool to improve academic achievement and writing in the context of scientific literacy. This quasi-experimental study compared the effects of using the SWH in five laboratory settings over a 16-week span. The SWH was administered to a treatment group (n=63), whereas the comparison group (n=67) received laboratory sessions using a traditional laboratory report format.
ISBN: 9780355153699Subjects--Topical Terms:
521340
Science education.
Writing-to-Learn in High-School Chemistry: The Effects of Using the Science Writing Heuristic to Increase Scientific Literacy.
LDR
:03542nmm a2200301 4500
001
2127741
005
20180105074619.5
008
180830s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9780355153699
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10608491
035
$a
AAI10608491
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Nurnberg, Denae.
$3
3289912
245
1 0
$a
Writing-to-Learn in High-School Chemistry: The Effects of Using the Science Writing Heuristic to Increase Scientific Literacy.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2017
300
$a
167 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.
500
$a
Adviser: Patricia Busk.
502
$a
Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of San Francisco, 2017.
520
$a
Writing-to-Learn in High-School Chemistry: The Effects of Using the Science Writing Heuristic to Increase Scientific Literacy The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of using the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) as an instructional tool to improve academic achievement and writing in the context of scientific literacy. This quasi-experimental study compared the effects of using the SWH in five laboratory settings over a 16-week span. The SWH was administered to a treatment group (n=63), whereas the comparison group (n=67) received laboratory sessions using a traditional laboratory report format.
520
$a
There were four classes (n=130) of general chemistry enrolled in the study with two teachers. Each teacher taught a treatment and comparison class during the study. A pretest was administered to investigate any between-group mean differences. There was no statistically significant difference in between-group mean differences. The dependent measures administered to investigate differences between the treatment and comparison group included five SWH laboratory scores, a posttest content assessment (CA), a posttest written assessment (WA), and a student perceptions questionnaire. Teacher interviews were conducted as anecdotal evidence of teachers' opinions about the use of the SWH compared with a traditional laboratory format.
520
$a
The means on the CA and the WA were higher in the treatment group than the comparison group. Two independent-samples t tests were conducted to compare the means of the CA and the WA by treatment and comparison groups. Ten paired-samples t tests were used to make planned pairwise comparisons between the laboratory scores. There were five statistically significant differences in laboratory scores; however, there was no clear linear trend of an increase in means over time. There were no statistically significant differences in the posttest CA or posttest WA. There was a statistically significant difference in one of the student-perceptions-questionnaire components focused on writing as a tool for learning chemistry. The results favored the traditional laboratory format group. Post-hoc data analyses were conducted due to treatment fidelity concerns. A statistically significant difference in means was found between a treatment and comparison class through the post-hoc analyses. Additional research may be conducted on professional development to support teachers in implementing the SWH with fidelity. Keywords: Scientific Literacy, Science Writing Heuristic, Writing-to-Learn, Science Laboratories.
590
$a
School code: 6019.
650
4
$a
Science education.
$3
521340
690
$a
0714
710
2
$a
University of San Francisco.
$b
Education.
$3
3278100
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
79-01A(E).
790
$a
6019
791
$a
Ed.D.
792
$a
2017
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10608491
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9338345
電子資源
01.外借(書)_YB
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入