語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
到查詢結果
[ subject:"Pedagogy." ]
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Agreement in the context of coordina...
~
Bhatia, Archna.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Agreement in the context of coordination Hindi as a case study.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Agreement in the context of coordination Hindi as a case study./
作者:
Bhatia, Archna.
面頁冊數:
257 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-05, Section: A, page: 1771.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International73-05A.
標題:
Rhetoric. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3496264
ISBN:
9781267154804
Agreement in the context of coordination Hindi as a case study.
Bhatia, Archna.
Agreement in the context of coordination Hindi as a case study.
- 257 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-05, Section: A, page: 1771.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2011.
Agreement is a prevalent phenomenon observed across languages. It helps us identify which elements in the sentence are linked or should be interpreted together (Bock et al 1999). This property of agreement may imply that the PF would always be faithful to syntax/ LF, i.e. it would always show features of the element with which syntax establishes agreement relationship. However, when we look at agreement in the context of coordination, we find that this is not the case. We can get Closest Conjunct Agreement in addition to the Full Agreement with the whole coordinated phrase. One way to account for the Closest Conjunct Agreement is to assume an underlying clausal coordination with conjunction reduction. I show that the constructions involving Closest Conjunct Agreement should not be analyzed as involving clausal coordination based on various theoretical as well as empirical factors. Another way to account for Closest Conjunct Agreement, especially looking at head initial languages, may be to assume that the structure of coordination plays a role in Closest Conjunct Agreement. Using the data from head final languages (mainly Hindi), I have shown that the structure of coordination is not involved in the Closest Conjunct Agreement constructions always. Based on various empirical facts, such as CCA asymmetry based on the word order as in Arabic, CCA asymmetry based on the verb types as in Hindi, the presence of both First Conjunct Agreement and the Last Conjunct Agreement within the same language, the requirement in some languages for strict adjacency for Closest Conjunct Agreement, mixed agreement facts, etc., I present an alternative analysis of Closest Conjunct Agreement which assumes the role of syntactic agreement relations as well as PF relations of linear proximity/ adjacency. I show that this analysis is generalizable across languages with different word orders. Also I show how this analysis is applicable to different types of constructions, such as local Closest Conjunct Agreement as well as Long Distance Closest Conjunct Agreement. The proposed analysis represents a compositional view of agreement, i.e. it assumes that agreement takes place in two stages: first the agreement relationship is established in syntax, and then the agreement features are spelled out in the PF component. Hence it suggests that, in an agreement relation, not only syntax but also the PF component of grammar plays a role.
ISBN: 9781267154804Subjects--Topical Terms:
516647
Rhetoric.
Agreement in the context of coordination Hindi as a case study.
LDR
:03329nmm a2200277 4500
001
2060594
005
20150909085713.5
008
170521s2011 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781267154804
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI3496264
035
$a
AAI3496264
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Bhatia, Archna.
$3
3174764
245
1 0
$a
Agreement in the context of coordination Hindi as a case study.
300
$a
257 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-05, Section: A, page: 1771.
500
$a
Adviser: Elabbas Benmamoun.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2011.
520
$a
Agreement is a prevalent phenomenon observed across languages. It helps us identify which elements in the sentence are linked or should be interpreted together (Bock et al 1999). This property of agreement may imply that the PF would always be faithful to syntax/ LF, i.e. it would always show features of the element with which syntax establishes agreement relationship. However, when we look at agreement in the context of coordination, we find that this is not the case. We can get Closest Conjunct Agreement in addition to the Full Agreement with the whole coordinated phrase. One way to account for the Closest Conjunct Agreement is to assume an underlying clausal coordination with conjunction reduction. I show that the constructions involving Closest Conjunct Agreement should not be analyzed as involving clausal coordination based on various theoretical as well as empirical factors. Another way to account for Closest Conjunct Agreement, especially looking at head initial languages, may be to assume that the structure of coordination plays a role in Closest Conjunct Agreement. Using the data from head final languages (mainly Hindi), I have shown that the structure of coordination is not involved in the Closest Conjunct Agreement constructions always. Based on various empirical facts, such as CCA asymmetry based on the word order as in Arabic, CCA asymmetry based on the verb types as in Hindi, the presence of both First Conjunct Agreement and the Last Conjunct Agreement within the same language, the requirement in some languages for strict adjacency for Closest Conjunct Agreement, mixed agreement facts, etc., I present an alternative analysis of Closest Conjunct Agreement which assumes the role of syntactic agreement relations as well as PF relations of linear proximity/ adjacency. I show that this analysis is generalizable across languages with different word orders. Also I show how this analysis is applicable to different types of constructions, such as local Closest Conjunct Agreement as well as Long Distance Closest Conjunct Agreement. The proposed analysis represents a compositional view of agreement, i.e. it assumes that agreement takes place in two stages: first the agreement relationship is established in syntax, and then the agreement features are spelled out in the PF component. Hence it suggests that, in an agreement relation, not only syntax but also the PF component of grammar plays a role.
590
$a
School code: 0090.
650
4
$a
Rhetoric.
$3
516647
650
4
$a
Pedagogy.
$3
2122828
690
$a
0681
690
$a
0456
710
2
$a
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
$3
626646
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
73-05A.
790
$a
0090
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2011
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3496264
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9293252
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入