語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
到查詢結果
[ subject:"Information science." ]
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Organizing scientific data sets: Stu...
~
White, Hollie C.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Organizing scientific data sets: Studying similarities and differences in metadata and subject term creation.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Organizing scientific data sets: Studying similarities and differences in metadata and subject term creation./
作者:
White, Hollie C.
面頁冊數:
199 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International73-10A(E).
標題:
Information science. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3512772
ISBN:
9781267420497
Organizing scientific data sets: Studying similarities and differences in metadata and subject term creation.
White, Hollie C.
Organizing scientific data sets: Studying similarities and differences in metadata and subject term creation.
- 199 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-10(E), Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2012.
BACKGROUND: According to Salo (2010), the metadata entered into repositories are "disorganized" and metadata schemes underlying repositories are "arcane". This creates a challenging repository environment in regards to personal information management (PIM) and knowledge organization systems (KOSs). This dissertation research is a step towards addressing the need to study information organization of scientific data in more detail.
ISBN: 9781267420497Subjects--Topical Terms:
554358
Information science.
Organizing scientific data sets: Studying similarities and differences in metadata and subject term creation.
LDR
:03085nmm a2200301 4500
001
2072281
005
20160729143532.5
008
170521s2012 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781267420497
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI3512772
035
$a
AAI3512772
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
White, Hollie C.
$3
3187448
245
1 0
$a
Organizing scientific data sets: Studying similarities and differences in metadata and subject term creation.
300
$a
199 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-10(E), Section: A.
500
$a
Adviser: Jane Greenberg.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2012.
520
$a
BACKGROUND: According to Salo (2010), the metadata entered into repositories are "disorganized" and metadata schemes underlying repositories are "arcane". This creates a challenging repository environment in regards to personal information management (PIM) and knowledge organization systems (KOSs). This dissertation research is a step towards addressing the need to study information organization of scientific data in more detail.
520
$a
METHODS: A concurrent triangulation mixed methods approach was used to study the descriptive metadata and subject term application of information professionals and scientists when working with two data sets (the bird data set and the hunting data set). Quantitative and qualitative methods were used in combination during study design, data collection, and analysis.
520
$a
RESULTS: A total of 27 participants, 11 information professionals and 16 scientists took part in this study. Descriptive metadata results indicate that information professionals were more likely to use standardized metadata schemes. Scientists did not use library-based standards to organize data in their own collections. Nearly all scientists mentioned how central software was to their overall data organization processes. Subject term application results suggest that the Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS) was the best vocabulary for describing scientific names, while Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) was best for describing topical terms. The two groups applied 45 topical terms to the bird data set and 49 topical terms to the hunting data set. Term overlap, meaning the same terms were applied by both groups, was close to 25% for each data set (27% for the bird data set and 24% for the hunting data set). Unique terms, those terms applied by either group were more widely dispersed.
520
$a
CONCLUSIONS: While there were similarities between the two groups, it is the differences that were the most apparent. Based on this research it is recommended that general repositories use metadata created by information professionals, while domain specific repositories use metadata created by scientists.
590
$a
School code: 0153.
650
4
$a
Information science.
$3
554358
690
$a
0723
710
2
$a
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
$b
Information & Library Science: Information Science.
$3
1020714
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
73-10A(E).
790
$a
0153
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2012
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3512772
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9305149
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入