東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"Education Policy." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Due Process for Whom?: Evaluation of...

Wyatt, Sybil Brianne.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Due Process for Whom?: Evaluation of Sexual Misconduct Policies at Institutions of Higher Education from the Lens of the Respondent.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Due Process for Whom?: Evaluation of Sexual Misconduct Policies at Institutions of Higher Education from the Lens of the Respondent./
作者:	Wyatt, Sybil Brianne.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	210 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-12A.
標題:	Law. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13896514
ISBN:	9781392272473

Due Process for Whom?: Evaluation of Sexual Misconduct Policies at Institutions of Higher Education from the Lens of the Respondent.
Wyatt, Sybil Brianne.

Due Process for Whom?: Evaluation of Sexual Misconduct Policies at Institutions of Higher Education from the Lens of the Respondent. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 210 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Missouri - Kansas City, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Critics of the implementation of Title IX at institutions of higher education (IHEs) argue that due process in the investigation and adjudication of sexual misconduct is severely lacking. In response, the Office for Civil Rights proposed amended regulations in November 2018 that require a greater focus on the due process rights of the accused (the Respondent) at IHEs. The present study sought to examine the content of Title IX policies from the perspective of the Respondent, asking (1) to what extent do policies provide due process to Respondents as measured through the frequency of inclusion of words and/or phrases comprising six due process themes; and (2) in examining these policies, are there differences in due process provided when policies are categorized by institution size or federal appellate jurisdiction?A coding instrument was developed for a content analysis of institutional Title IX policies in consideration of the six themes: proper notice, the right to an advisor, the opportunity to be heard, the right of confrontation, the right to appeal, and the need for impartiality and fairness. Determination of the sample was through use of homogenous non-probability sampling of an entire population that included all IHEs that met seven criteria. The 238 policies were accessed via institutional websites and were hand-coded with multiple checks on inter-rater reliability. The resulting nominal data was analyzed using descriptive statistics to identify patterns in the text.The findings indicate that the current state of due process in regard to most sample policies is on par with expectations in many areas, such as the provision of multiple aspects of proper notice to the Respondent and to the campus community, the ability to have an advisor and to be heard in one's own defense, the right to review information gathered by the investigator(s), the right to appeal, and numerous characteristics of impartiality and fairness. However, there remain pockets of inadequacies from the perspective of a Respondent, including the lack of advisor participation, the submission of anonymous or confidential complaints, the lack of amnesty for Respondents, and the charged terminology used within the policies themselves.

ISBN: 9781392272473Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.

Due Process for Whom?: Evaluation of Sexual Misconduct Policies at Institutions of Higher Education from the Lens of the Respondent.
LDR:03407nmm a2200337 4500 001 2263108
005 20191121114014.5
008 220629s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392272473
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13896514
035 $a (MiAaPQ)umkc:11449
035 $a AAI13896514
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Wyatt, Sybil Brianne. $3 3540187
245 1 0 $a Due Process for Whom?: Evaluation of Sexual Misconduct Policies at Institutions of Higher Education from the Lens of the Respondent.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 210 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Riggers-Piehl, Tiffani.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Missouri - Kansas City, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Critics of the implementation of Title IX at institutions of higher education (IHEs) argue that due process in the investigation and adjudication of sexual misconduct is severely lacking. In response, the Office for Civil Rights proposed amended regulations in November 2018 that require a greater focus on the due process rights of the accused (the Respondent) at IHEs. The present study sought to examine the content of Title IX policies from the perspective of the Respondent, asking (1) to what extent do policies provide due process to Respondents as measured through the frequency of inclusion of words and/or phrases comprising six due process themes; and (2) in examining these policies, are there differences in due process provided when policies are categorized by institution size or federal appellate jurisdiction?A coding instrument was developed for a content analysis of institutional Title IX policies in consideration of the six themes: proper notice, the right to an advisor, the opportunity to be heard, the right of confrontation, the right to appeal, and the need for impartiality and fairness. Determination of the sample was through use of homogenous non-probability sampling of an entire population that included all IHEs that met seven criteria. The 238 policies were accessed via institutional websites and were hand-coded with multiple checks on inter-rater reliability. The resulting nominal data was analyzed using descriptive statistics to identify patterns in the text.The findings indicate that the current state of due process in regard to most sample policies is on par with expectations in many areas, such as the provision of multiple aspects of proper notice to the Respondent and to the campus community, the ability to have an advisor and to be heard in one's own defense, the right to review information gathered by the investigator(s), the right to appeal, and numerous characteristics of impartiality and fairness. However, there remain pockets of inadequacies from the perspective of a Respondent, including the lack of advisor participation, the submission of anonymous or confidential complaints, the lack of amnesty for Respondents, and the charged terminology used within the policies themselves.
590 $a School code: 0134.
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Education Policy. $3 2186666
650 4 $a Educational administration. $3 2122799
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0458
690 $a 0514
710 2 $a University of Missouri - Kansas City. $b Education. $3 3174049
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-12A.
790 $a 0134
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13896514