東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Print and digital texts: Evaluating ...

Maynard, Stephanie Elizabeth.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Print and digital texts: Evaluating the differences in reading comprehension strategies.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Print and digital texts: Evaluating the differences in reading comprehension strategies./
作者:	Maynard, Stephanie Elizabeth.
面頁冊數:	97 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-07(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-07A(E).
標題:	Reading instruction. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10012366
ISBN:	9781339475189

Print and digital texts: Evaluating the differences in reading comprehension strategies.
Maynard, Stephanie Elizabeth.

Print and digital texts: Evaluating the differences in reading comprehension strategies. - 97 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-07(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Phoenix, 2016.

Concerns about the reading comprehension skills of students in the United States have been raised partly because of the introduction of digital products into their lives and the classroom setting. The Arizona Instrument to Measure Standards results from 2013 that were provided by the Arizona Department of Education indicated that reading scores drop from 1 point up to 30 points in Grade 8. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of technology on reading comprehension to determine whether there needs to be a change in how reading comprehension is taught. A quantitative, correlational method was used with a sample of Grade 8 students in a school in Maricopa County, AZ. Students were given a pretest and then divided randomly into two groups. One group read a text in print format, and the other read a text in digital format. Both groups were taught reading comprehension using the reciprocal teaching method. All students were then given a posttest. The Mann-Whitney test performed to analyze the collected data for the research question did not provide evidence of a significant relationship between reading medium (print vs. digital) and reading comprehension. The mean data for the group using digital text declined, showing a net loss of -0.58; the mean data for the group using print text showed a net loss of -6.56. The Spearman-Rho correlation (rs) evaluated the strength of the relationship between groups, and the Mann-Whitney z score measured differences between the two groups. Pretest scores and reading comprehension of print and digital text were not significantly related (r s = .06, p = .78). Posttest and comprehension scores between the print and digital formats also were not significantly related (rs = .19, p = .39).

ISBN: 9781339475189Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122756
Reading instruction.

Print and digital texts: Evaluating the differences in reading comprehension strategies.
LDR:02679nmm a2200289 4500 001 2072015
005 20160723161809.5
008 170521s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339475189
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10012366
035 $a AAI10012366
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Maynard, Stephanie Elizabeth. $3 3187207
245 1 0 $a Print and digital texts: Evaluating the differences in reading comprehension strategies.
300 $a 97 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-07(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Erika Burton.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Phoenix, 2016.
520 $a Concerns about the reading comprehension skills of students in the United States have been raised partly because of the introduction of digital products into their lives and the classroom setting. The Arizona Instrument to Measure Standards results from 2013 that were provided by the Arizona Department of Education indicated that reading scores drop from 1 point up to 30 points in Grade 8. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of technology on reading comprehension to determine whether there needs to be a change in how reading comprehension is taught. A quantitative, correlational method was used with a sample of Grade 8 students in a school in Maricopa County, AZ. Students were given a pretest and then divided randomly into two groups. One group read a text in print format, and the other read a text in digital format. Both groups were taught reading comprehension using the reciprocal teaching method. All students were then given a posttest. The Mann-Whitney test performed to analyze the collected data for the research question did not provide evidence of a significant relationship between reading medium (print vs. digital) and reading comprehension. The mean data for the group using digital text declined, showing a net loss of -0.58; the mean data for the group using print text showed a net loss of -6.56. The Spearman-Rho correlation (rs) evaluated the strength of the relationship between groups, and the Mann-Whitney z score measured differences between the two groups. Pretest scores and reading comprehension of print and digital text were not significantly related (r s = .06, p = .78). Posttest and comprehension scores between the print and digital formats also were not significantly related (rs = .19, p = .39).
590 $a School code: 0850.
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 2122756
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 3168483
690 $a 0535
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0288
710 2 $a University of Phoenix. $b School of Advanced Studies. $3 3184515
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-07A(E).
790 $a 0850
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10012366