東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Essence and necessity, and the Arist...

Vecchio, Daniel James.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Essence and necessity, and the Aristotelian modal syllogistic: A historical and analytical study.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Essence and necessity, and the Aristotelian modal syllogistic: A historical and analytical study./
作者:	Vecchio, Daniel James.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	299 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 77-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International77-12A.
標題:	Logic. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10132125
ISBN:	9781339899565

Essence and necessity, and the Aristotelian modal syllogistic: A historical and analytical study.
Vecchio, Daniel James.

Essence and necessity, and the Aristotelian modal syllogistic: A historical and analytical study. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 299 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 77-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Marquette University, 2016.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The following is a critical and historical account of Aristotelian Essentialism informed by recent work on Aristotle's modal syllogistic. The semantics of the modal syllogistic are interpreted in a way that is motivated by Aristotle, and also make his validity claims in the Prior Analytics consistent to a higher degree than previously developed interpretative models. In Chapter One, ancient and contemporary objections to the Aristotelian modal syllogistic are discussed. A resolution to apparent inconsistencies in Aristotle's modal syllogistic is proposed and developed out of recent work by Patterson, Rini, and Malink. In particular, I argue that the semantics of negation is distinct in modal context from those of assertoric negative claims. Given my interpretive model of Aristotle's semantics, in Chapter Two, I provide proofs for each of the mixed apodictic syllogisms, and propose a method of using Venn Diagrams to visualize the validity claims Aristotle makes in the Prior Analytics. Chapter Three explores how Aristotle's syllogistic fits within Aristotle's philosophy of science and demonstration, particularly within the context of the Posterior Analytics. Consideration is given to the Aristotelian understanding of the relationship among necessity, explanation, definition, and essence. Chapter Four applies Aristotelian modal logic in contemporary contexts. I contrast Aristotelian modality and essentialism with contemporary modalism based upon the semantics of possible worlds, e.g. Kripke and Putnam. I also develop an account of how Aristotelian modal logic can ground a sortal dependent theory of identity, as discussed by Wiggins.

ISBN: 9781339899565Subjects--Topical Terms:

529544
Logic.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Aristotle

Essence and necessity, and the Aristotelian modal syllogistic: A historical and analytical study.
LDR:02916nmm a2200397 4500 001 2285276
005 20211129133326.5
008 220723s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339899565
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10132125
035 $a (MiAaPQ)marquette:11090
035 $a AAI10132125
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Vecchio, Daniel James. $3 3564569
245 1 0 $a Essence and necessity, and the Aristotelian modal syllogistic: A historical and analytical study.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 299 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 77-12, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Goldin, Owen.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Marquette University, 2016.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The following is a critical and historical account of Aristotelian Essentialism informed by recent work on Aristotle's modal syllogistic. The semantics of the modal syllogistic are interpreted in a way that is motivated by Aristotle, and also make his validity claims in the Prior Analytics consistent to a higher degree than previously developed interpretative models. In Chapter One, ancient and contemporary objections to the Aristotelian modal syllogistic are discussed. A resolution to apparent inconsistencies in Aristotle's modal syllogistic is proposed and developed out of recent work by Patterson, Rini, and Malink. In particular, I argue that the semantics of negation is distinct in modal context from those of assertoric negative claims. Given my interpretive model of Aristotle's semantics, in Chapter Two, I provide proofs for each of the mixed apodictic syllogisms, and propose a method of using Venn Diagrams to visualize the validity claims Aristotle makes in the Prior Analytics. Chapter Three explores how Aristotle's syllogistic fits within Aristotle's philosophy of science and demonstration, particularly within the context of the Posterior Analytics. Consideration is given to the Aristotelian understanding of the relationship among necessity, explanation, definition, and essence. Chapter Four applies Aristotelian modal logic in contemporary contexts. I contrast Aristotelian modality and essentialism with contemporary modalism based upon the semantics of possible worlds, e.g. Kripke and Putnam. I also develop an account of how Aristotelian modal logic can ground a sortal dependent theory of identity, as discussed by Wiggins.
590 $a School code: 0116.
650 4 $a Logic. $3 529544
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
653 $a Aristotle
653 $a Essentialism
653 $a Metaphysics
653 $a Modal logic
653 $a Prior analytics
653 $a Syllogisms
690 $a 0395
690 $a 0422
710 2 $a Marquette University. $b Philosophy. $3 1669616
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 77-12A.
790 $a 0116
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10132125