東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Clarifying the Theological Significance of the School of Antioch: Historical Revision through a Biblical-Hermeneutical Lens.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Clarifying the Theological Significance of the School of Antioch: Historical Revision through a Biblical-Hermeneutical Lens./
作者:	Jackson, William L.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2022,
面頁冊數:	260 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-11, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-11A.
標題:	Theology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29169262
ISBN:	9798426851559

Clarifying the Theological Significance of the School of Antioch: Historical Revision through a Biblical-Hermeneutical Lens.
Jackson, William L.

Clarifying the Theological Significance of the School of Antioch: Historical Revision through a Biblical-Hermeneutical Lens. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022 - 260 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-11, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, 2022.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This dissertation will argue that the most appropriate and helpful approach to discerning the theological significance of the so-called School of Antioch is one that is theologically comprehensive but also distinctly biblical-hermeneutical. Chapter 1 begins by previewing the historical significance of the city of Antioch, its cultural relevance within the ancient world, and the asketerion for which it would come be associated within Christendom. Additionally, the occasion for this study is presented-the claims that the School of Antioch should be viewed solely with respect to its christological legacy. Chapter 2 assesses the merits of an exclusively christological approach to the School of Antioch. Various claims regarding the ancient figures Diodore of Tarsus, Theodore of Mopsuestia, and Nestorius, which would seek to situate the three as christological heretics, are examined systematically by surveying Antiochene scholarship as well as some primary sources believed to be written by Theodore. The chapter concludes with the assertion that an exclusively christological approach to the School of Antioch is insufficient for recovering its full theological significance. Chapter 3 begins by arguing that a theologically comprehensive approach to the School of Antioch which is distinctly biblical-hermeneutical requires correction to unfortunate misunderstandings. Specifically, Chapter 3 addresses the caricature surrounding the School of Antioch which posits its interpreters as those read the Bible as simple and rigid literalists. Contrary to this false understanding, this chapter will recover the Antiochene approach to spiritual interpretation by examining the concepts of typology, theoria, and mimesis. Chapter 4 addresses historical interpretation within the School of Antioch as it has sometimes been overexaggerated in modern scholarship and inappropriately linked to the historical-critical movement. For this recovery, the Antiochene understanding and usage of historia will first be examined. This chapter will conclude by comparing the methodological and theological differences between the ancient Antiochenes and the historical-critics of the modern era. Chapter 5, building upon the clarifications provided in prior chapters, will present a theologically-comprehensive approach to the School of Antioch by examining the relationship to exegesis and theology within the school by unpacking three distinctives: 1) the Antiochene view of Scripture; 2) the impact of classical rhetorical training upon the biblical-hermeneutics of Antioch; and 3) the rootedness of the Antiochenes in the Nicene theological movement.

ISBN: 9798426851559Subjects--Topical Terms:

516533
Theology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Antioch

Clarifying the Theological Significance of the School of Antioch: Historical Revision through a Biblical-Hermeneutical Lens.
LDR:03894nmm a2200385 4500 001 2352736
005 20221205085516.5
008 241004s2022 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798426851559
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29169262
035 $a AAI29169262
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Jackson, William L. $3 671761
245 1 0 $a Clarifying the Theological Significance of the School of Antioch: Historical Revision through a Biblical-Hermeneutical Lens.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2022
300 $a 260 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-11, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: McKinion, Steven.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, 2022.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This dissertation will argue that the most appropriate and helpful approach to discerning the theological significance of the so-called School of Antioch is one that is theologically comprehensive but also distinctly biblical-hermeneutical. Chapter 1 begins by previewing the historical significance of the city of Antioch, its cultural relevance within the ancient world, and the asketerion for which it would come be associated within Christendom. Additionally, the occasion for this study is presented-the claims that the School of Antioch should be viewed solely with respect to its christological legacy. Chapter 2 assesses the merits of an exclusively christological approach to the School of Antioch. Various claims regarding the ancient figures Diodore of Tarsus, Theodore of Mopsuestia, and Nestorius, which would seek to situate the three as christological heretics, are examined systematically by surveying Antiochene scholarship as well as some primary sources believed to be written by Theodore. The chapter concludes with the assertion that an exclusively christological approach to the School of Antioch is insufficient for recovering its full theological significance. Chapter 3 begins by arguing that a theologically comprehensive approach to the School of Antioch which is distinctly biblical-hermeneutical requires correction to unfortunate misunderstandings. Specifically, Chapter 3 addresses the caricature surrounding the School of Antioch which posits its interpreters as those read the Bible as simple and rigid literalists. Contrary to this false understanding, this chapter will recover the Antiochene approach to spiritual interpretation by examining the concepts of typology, theoria, and mimesis. Chapter 4 addresses historical interpretation within the School of Antioch as it has sometimes been overexaggerated in modern scholarship and inappropriately linked to the historical-critical movement. For this recovery, the Antiochene understanding and usage of historia will first be examined. This chapter will conclude by comparing the methodological and theological differences between the ancient Antiochenes and the historical-critics of the modern era. Chapter 5, building upon the clarifications provided in prior chapters, will present a theologically-comprehensive approach to the School of Antioch by examining the relationship to exegesis and theology within the school by unpacking three distinctives: 1) the Antiochene view of Scripture; 2) the impact of classical rhetorical training upon the biblical-hermeneutics of Antioch; and 3) the rootedness of the Antiochenes in the Nicene theological movement.
590 $a School code: 1342.
650 4 $a Theology. $3 516533
650 4 $a History. $3 516518
650 4 $a Biblical studies. $3 2122820
653 $a Antioch
653 $a Asketerion
653 $a Chrysostom, John
653 $a Nestorius
653 $a School of Antioch
653 $a Theodore of Mopsuestia
690 $a 0469
690 $a 0578
690 $a 0321
710 2 $a Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary. $b Department of Graduate Studies. $3 3286302
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-11A.
790 $a 1342
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2022
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29169262