東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

How faculty at predominantly ungergr...

Magee, Frances Marie.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

How faculty at predominantly ungergraduate institutions incorporate undergraduate research in their work lives.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	How faculty at predominantly ungergraduate institutions incorporate undergraduate research in their work lives./
作者:	Magee, Frances Marie.
面頁冊數:	282 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-06(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-06A(E).
標題:	Education, Higher. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3613563
ISBN:	9781303765230

How faculty at predominantly ungergraduate institutions incorporate undergraduate research in their work lives.
Magee, Frances Marie.

How faculty at predominantly ungergraduate institutions incorporate undergraduate research in their work lives. - 282 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-06(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Teachers College, Columbia University, 2014.

This study examines why and how science and social science faculty at predominantly undergraduate colleges engage in undergraduate research (UR) while successfully attending to their scholarly and professional responsibilities. Given the increase in attention to UR as an innovative practice enhancing undergraduate education, most studies have focused on students as the primary beneficiaries. Few studies have considered the experiences of faculty who facilitate undergraduate students' learning of research. This study addresses (1) why faculty include UR in their work; (2) how faculty organize their professional and scholarly lives to participate in the planning and doing of UR; and (3) from the perspective of participating faculty, how institutional (campus) context may hinder or support faculty efforts in UR.

ISBN: 9781303765230Subjects--Topical Terms:

543175
Education, Higher.

How faculty at predominantly ungergraduate institutions incorporate undergraduate research in their work lives.
LDR:03379nmm a2200313 4500 001 2055457
005 20150127125438.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303765230
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3613563
035 $a AAI3613563
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Magee, Frances Marie. $3 3169120
245 1 0 $a How faculty at predominantly ungergraduate institutions incorporate undergraduate research in their work lives.
300 $a 282 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-06(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Anna Neumann; Judith Glazer-Raymo.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Teachers College, Columbia University, 2014.
520 $a This study examines why and how science and social science faculty at predominantly undergraduate colleges engage in undergraduate research (UR) while successfully attending to their scholarly and professional responsibilities. Given the increase in attention to UR as an innovative practice enhancing undergraduate education, most studies have focused on students as the primary beneficiaries. Few studies have considered the experiences of faculty who facilitate undergraduate students' learning of research. This study addresses (1) why faculty include UR in their work; (2) how faculty organize their professional and scholarly lives to participate in the planning and doing of UR; and (3) from the perspective of participating faculty, how institutional (campus) context may hinder or support faculty efforts in UR.
520 $a Conducted at four predominantly undergraduate institutions, each promoting a visible commitment to UR along with dedicated institutional resources, this study relied on two rounds of interviews. The first round of interviews included 38 UR science and social science faculty (between 8--11 from each institution), along with five administrators (between 1--2 from each college). The second round interviews included additional interviews with nine of the faculty (between 1-3 from each site) from the first round of interviews. In addition, professional documents from faculty and institutional sources regarding UR were analyzed.
520 $a The study resulted in three main findings. (1) Involvement in UR enables faculty to both advance their own scholarship and promote undergraduate learning and development. (2) Faculty's dedication to their own research guides how they organize their efforts within UR. (3) The interplay between the institutional setting (including the context of an undergraduate college as well as institutional initiatives to support UR) and faculty members (who situate the work of UR in their careers) shapes what UR can look like within an institution. Together, these findings offer possibilities for reasons and ways science and social science faculty at predominantly undergraduate institutions may decide to take on UR and sustain such involvement in their careers. Study findings may inform faculty who are considering involvement in UR, faculty who are already participating in UR, and institutions aiming to enhance support of UR faculty.
590 $a School code: 0055.
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
650 4 $a Education, Higher Education Administration. $3 1669382
650 4 $a Education, Policy. $3 1669130
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0446
690 $a 0458
710 2 $a Teachers College, Columbia University. $b Organization and Leadership. $3 2049780
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-06A(E).
790 $a 0055
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3613563